Linze County Court: Promote the experience characteristics of Fengqiao in the new era, and create a highlight of the source governance of the "quarter -current and one center"

Since the reform of the registration system in 2015, the case of the receiving cases of the Linze County People's Court has risen sharply year by year. In 2019, it reached 5,814 peaks. More than times. Faced with the huge pressure and realistic dilemma of more people and less people, the Linze County People's Court conscientiously implemented the central government's innovation measures on the requirements of the central government on the requirements of the "non -complaint dispute resolution mechanism" Construction, fully use the strength of the county and township comprehensive governance center, deeply explore the essence of the "Maple Bridge Experience", and propose a multi -resolution mechanism of contradictions and disputes in the "quarter -current and one center. Promote modernization of municipal governance.

The first is to divert to the comprehensive governance center. When the people's court litigation service center received the request from the parties, if the review was concluded by the pre -litigation mediation, the parties were sowed to the county comprehensive governance center after the party's consent was obtained before the case was filed. The county comprehensive governance center establishes the work system of "unified acceptance, classification adjustment" and "central blow whistle, departmental registration". Disputes on the diversion of the court will first be based on the brand mediation room, lawyer mediation room, or family mediation room or family mediation room or household mediation room. According to the industry mediation organization, it can also be diverted to the town comprehensive governance center organization for mediation or submitted to the judicial office, police station, and village regulation committee to mediate. The entire mediation period is 20 days. If the mediation is successful, the litigation service center will conduct judicial confirmation or guidance of it online for judicial confirmation; if the mediation is unsuccessful, the case material will be returned to the court's litigation service center in a timely manner to handle the filing procedures.

The second is to divert the mediation before trial. Establish a complaint docking center at the Litigation Service Center, select 12 special mediators from lawyers and people's jurors, and carry out a pre -trial mediation work under the guidance of the judge in conjunction with the court. If the mediation before the lawsuit is unsuccessful or the parties are unwilling to choose to resolve the dispute before the mediation method of the prior to the law, guide the parties to the pre -trial mediation after the formulation of the case, and the mediation period is 7 days. If the mediation is successful, the mediation letter is issued; if the mediation is unsuccessful, the return service center will be returned to the next step.

The third is to diverge into the fast -tailoring team. Establish a "1+1+N" fast -tailoring team at the Litigation Service Center to select the judges and judges with strong business capabilities and rich trial experience to handle the case for the case for the case. It is determined as a "brief case" and assigned to the fast -tailoring team for quick layout. The fast -tailoring period is 30 days. If it is unsuccessful within 30 days, it will be diverted four times.

The fourth is to diverge the fine trial team. The difficult and complicated cases determined as a "prince case" are diverted to the professional civil trial team. The courts, the president and other business quality and experienced judges shall conduct a refined trial.

Through the four diversion of comprehensive governance centers, pre -trial mediation, tailoring teams, and fine trial teams, strengthen information exchange, interoperability, personnel business training, and contradiction group prevention and group treatment. In the previous and the court's ruling, a new model of social governance was the core to ensure that the court's trial effect was unified with legal effects and social effects, and to help the complaints of complaints and sources were fully carried out.

- END -