The depth of field structure of good comments

Author: Cao Lin (well -known media)

Source: "Young Reporter", No. 11, 2022

The column article mentioned a "tension structure" that should be commented in a good comments, forming stability in contradictions and opposition. This article talks about another deep structural mode of comments: depth of field structure.

What is the depth of field structure? Those who know about photography know that taking one thing requires focusing, the distance of clear images presented in the front and back of the focus, the range of the front and rear is called Jing Shen. The depth of field highlights the depth of a thing. Similarly, the view is the same. The so -called "view" is the point of view that can be advanced in the vertical upward layer. This is the depth of field structure.

For example, writing a comments on "free", if you only stay in the analysis of "free and disadvantages", expand at the parallel level, what benefits and disadvantages are balanced, comprehensive, and overall. Comments of cognitive value. If you can advance layer by layer, from "free of charge", "free of charge often contains traps", "enjoy free but pay more elsewhere", "Since it will not give you the best", push to "free free" to "free free" to "free free" to "free free" to "free free" to "free free" to "free free" to "free free". It is often the most expensive ", and then concluded that" the scarce and most expensive one is actually time, free time is expensive time to be consumed ", so that the meat is bone, and the cocoons are led to the focus, and the views have depth of view. The depth of the comments is often this "depth of field", just like a good photo is not just the beauty on the plane, but the depth of field structure.

The opposite of the "depth of field structure" is "flat spreading exhibition", which is actually the contrast between "one -sided deep" and "superficial comprehensive". The law of depth of field is: 1. The larger the aperture, the lighter the depth of the field; the smaller the aperture, the deeper the depth of the field. 2. The farther the distance, the deeper the depth of the field; the closer the distance, the lighter the depth of the field. In the interpretation of the point of view, the wider the laying of the pavement, the more you get the face, the more superficial comments; the more specific the angle, the deeper you can get through. Keep a sense of distance from things, expand the horizon to the distance, and try to hear the cry in the distance. They are curious about the distant scenery. When everyone looks in one direction, look at it in the opposite direction. The depth of "seeing people is not seen".

The superficial complexion of the comment is often manifested in the plane. Economic, political, cultural, disseminated, legal, and medical, each "point" says 250 words, and the several levels of several levels, and the level of several levels It is "parallel" and lacks the connection of the fastening buckle. "Political level" is not launched by "economic level". The "communication level" and "legal perspective" have no progressive relationship, which is a simple list. A comment, if you can take it out to make a comment alone, it will not affect the integrity of the point of view after a certain paragraph, which is failed. This shows that the integrity of each paragraph is unnecessary. It is fragmented and listed and listed, and it is the "comprehensive" of large pieces of bread.

There is no thickness in the plane, that is, there is no depth, scattered point, and messy level. It is superficial and no "order" required for cognitive clearness. Corresponding to "Plane Development" is the "deep advancement", from shallow to deep, and step by step towards the essence of things. For example, what kind of economic consequences will it bring, how this economic consequences will be manifested on the political level, and eventually form a social crisis that is entangled with economic, political, and legal. Promoting has a deep perspective, and the logical chain is vertical. The latter judgment is based on the previous judgment. The previous judgment can be introduced. Judgment. In order to promote it, the cognition and judgment can be advanced in accordance with the premise of consensus and consensus, and the "water level" of judgment can be improved to see the profound side of things.

In addition to the vertical depth of field, there is also a key element, that is, there must be a focus, just like nails, anchoring a focus to "drill deep". For example, if you criticize some places "empty rumors", no one buys, and the credibility and persuasion crisis appears. One comment writes three levels. What? Second, we must have a clear argument to respond, and we must not only conclude; third, we must not be frank and transparent. Are these three aspects right? It makes sense, but what is the relationship between them? Why are there three aspects instead of four or five? Why do you say one first, can you put the three in one of them? What are the relationships and logic of these three? You can change it a little, so that this comment has a focus, such as "the government must have credibility, must have a sense of dialogue with the public", "dialogue" is the focus of the point of view: talk to the public, clarify the behind "rumors" behind True anxiety; talk to the public, use arguments to persuade instead of giving a "conclusion"; talk to the public instead of cutting dialogue, and turning into self -talk in the cover. Through the focus of the "dialogue", the three levels have a tight depth correlation between the three levels, forming depth of field effects.

Reference format for this article:

Cao Lin. The depth of the scene of good comment [J]. Young reporter, 2022 (11): 112.

- END -