Review immediately | The entrance examination is linked to petition, and the laziness and abuse of politics need to be held accountable

Critics Kong Yu Tong

On June 14th, the registration notice of the subordinates of the middle school entrance examination in Luoyang, Luoyang, Henan Province caused public opinion. The notice stated that because the community did not visit the community, the household registration candidate in the community was the first volunteer, and the first volunteer could be reduced by 3 points. On the afternoon of the same day, the staff of the Education and Sports Bureau of Luoyang Yanshi District said that after the emergence of public opinion, the downgrade policy had been suspended.

At the beginning of this policy, maybe someone was surprised to "have such good things?" But good things are still bad, and think about it: who is willing to sit with the children's middle school entrance examination with neighbors? Intersection What is fair for children who are not "no access zones"?

Fairness of education is a social conscience and an irreversible red line. How many students have a cold window for ten years and the level of competition is the level of three or five points. The future must not be wiped out because of an unrelated "no visit community". In recent years, the state's fiscal has maintained educational funding for more than 4%for nine consecutive years, which is to promote the more fair and comprehensive development of education. Today, there are local government departments regarding this important "fairness". The formulation of such a policy not only hurts the rights and interests of candidates, but also damages the credibility.

On the other hand, the issue of the grassroots community governance of residents is linked to the results of the entrance examination, and even community sitting is a proper laziness and abuse. There are problems with the community. Residents make suggestions, opinions, or complaints. Relevant agencies and units shall deal with them in accordance with regulations and laws to promote conflicts and disputes in a timely and effective resolution, rather than avoiding problems. They are abducted through the interests of completely irrelevant areas.

Even more sadly, relevant reports show that although this policy has only attracted public opinion today, it has been implemented in some places. China Youth Network reported in 2019 "Henan Xichuan's" Shengyuan Battle "to upgrade again, and" no visiting villages "can be reduced by 5 points." Pass.

"After the emergence of public opinion", the policy stopped. If public opinion does not appear, is this policy that destroys education fairness, laziness and abuse of power? What the public needs not only a "thought -oriented" explanation, but also the relevant departments need to be seriously held accountable for policy makers, deeply reflect on the problem, and avoid the next time.

- END -