NATO admits to Russia, but it is ruthless to China.

According to the cover news report, NATO Secretary -General Stoltenberg recently claimed that NATO was not part of the Russian -Ukraine conflict. Although he reiterated that "NATO continues to support Ukraine" again, he subsequently poured a pot of cold water for Kyiv: Ukraine was an important ally, but NATO would not directly participate in Ukraine's field operation.

In fact, this is not the first time NATO announced that it will not be directly announced that it will not participate in the Ukrainian war. Prior to this, when Ukraine begged NATO to set up a banned area in the country to offset the Russian army's air advantage, NATO directly rejected the request of Ukraine because it was "avoiding direct conflicts with Russia." Therefore, NATO has used Ukraine to sacrifice cannon fodder at any time, because they need interests, not the safety price for this.

NATO did not dare to invest in the situation in Ukraine. The factors were not just as simple as that they had conflicts with Russia. More importantly, Ukraine itself is a bottomless hole that can devour countless military resources. Even if NATO countries move their weapons, it is difficult to fill the bottomless hole in this war. Therefore, as Kyiv has become increasingly difficult to reverse the situation on the battlefield, the enthusiasm of many NATO countries has gradually diminished, which means that the Kyiv authorities have compromised to Moscow, maybe only the time left.

In a sense, NATO's provoking the Ukrainian war has now been proven to be a failure. This war consumed a large number of military resources in Western countries, and "assisted" Russia's expansion of a large number of territory. What embarrassing West is even more embarrassing that, due to the influence of war and sanctions, the Western economy has been severely damaged due to the large outbreak of the inflation crisis, which has made its international economic influence plummeting. Therefore, in order to restore the face, NATO can only cover its failure by re -manufacturing hot spots to cover up its failure on the Ukrainian issue.

To this end, while Stoltenberg reiterated that "NATO will not be able to involve the Ukraine conflict", it also points to China with a provocative fighter. According to Global Network, Stoltenberg said on the issue of "the necessity of fighting against China" and argued with the European parliament members: he respects the difference between China and the European Union, but for him, respect for human rights is the best It's important. What's more, the close relationship between Beijing and Moscow is a threat to NATO member states.

In fact, Stoltenberg itself is the spokesperson for the United States in the Brussels NATO headquarters. Whether it is provoking the Russian and Ukraine conflict, or in NATO in the new "Strategic Concept" document, it is the first time that China is regarded as NATO as the "systemicity of NATO He is a positive promoter. However, NATO regards China as a "systemic challenge", which is just the fantasy of the United States and Stoltenberg. Because of Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium and other major members of NATO, they are unwilling to be led by their noses towards the anti -China battlefield.

Therefore, when Stoltenberg became a "strategic concept" document into a waste paper, Star Tengberg once again pointed to China to China, not that he had the ability to convince European member states to go to the anti -China battlefield. On the contrary, when NATO faces a failure on the anti -Russian battlefield but is unwilling to admit defeat, Stoltenberg made the above remarks, which is more like the focus of making public opinion gimmicks to cover up NATO's failure on the Ukrainian issue. fact.

However, Stoltenberg's identity in Brussels at best is a slave in the United States. The extreme remarks he published in China cannot represent the true attitude of European member states. Therefore, after he rendered the "Chinese military threat theory", the British "Eye of the Middle East" news website warned: If NATO is enemy with China, it is threatening world peace. Because China will firmly occupy the economic dominance worldwide, this is what the United States and its NATO military bureaucracy are really worried. Therefore, the United States is more willing to take the risk of pushing the world to the edge of the nuclear war and encourage NATO to "fight against China."

Fortunately, most members of NATO have long seen the true colors of the United States and its military bureaucratic agencies. Therefore, most countries in Europe have basically held cautious attitudes in participating in the United States in the Asia -Pacific confrontation. After all, China is gradually replacing the dominance of the United States and Europe in the world economy. Unless European countries do not want to develop the economy, who is willing to abandon its own economic development rights for the United States? Stoltenberg, as a slave in the United States, tried to provoke a tense confrontation between China and Europe for the United States. The purpose was to cover up the fact that NATO's failure to suppress the strategy of Russia allowed the United States to make a profit from it. But it turns out that his attempt is destined to be unsuccessful.

- END -