Dai Xianghui, the original deputy secretary of the Ningxia Political and Legal Committee, sentenced to the first instance of bribery case

On July 13, 2022, the Intermediate People's Court of Shizuishan City in Ningxia passed the remote video system and publicly sentenced the defendant to the former deputy secretary of the original Secretary of Ningxia Political and Legal Committee Dai Xianghui. The penalty was RMB 2.3 million, and the property and interest of the bribery and interest were recovered in accordance with the law and paid the state treasury.

The court found out that from 2007 to 2019, the defendant Dai Xianghui used the convenience of the party group, deputy secretary of the party group, and deputy prosecutor of the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region People's Procuratorate. Individuals have obtained benefits in terms of case processing, corporate operations, engineering funds, and loan approval, and have illegally accepted other people's property equivalent to RMB 350.8202.81 million.

The Intermediate People's Court of Shizuishan City believes that the defendant Dai Xiang Hui, as a state staff, uses the convenience of his position to seek benefits for others, or use the convenience conditions formed by power and status to seek Improper interests, many illegal acceptance of other people's property, the amount is particularly huge, and its behavior constitutes a crime of bribery. Dai Xianghui has a bribe plot, and he should be punished by heavy punishment according to law. Dai Xianghui took the initiative to explain most of the facts that the supervisory organs have not yet mastered the facts of the crime of bribery. They truthfully confess their crimes, have a frank plot, refund all the stolen money, voluntarily confess and confess, sincerely regret the crime, and have the legal and depending on the plot of light punishment. Punishment from it according to law. The above judgment was made in accordance with the law.

After the verdict, the defendant Dai Xianghui stated that he obeyed the court's decision and did not appeal.

Source: Rule of Law Daily

- END -