Don't make new crown -positive discrimination

What we want to ask is, where are the discrimination of the new crown patients? Only by changing the soil that breeds discrimination can the situation of the recovery be truly improved.

Author: Yan Yong

Figure: Tuwa Creative

Guide

One || Shanghai official responded at a press conference on July 11 that such discrimination was illegal and required all units to treat the new crown -positive recovery in accordance with laws and regulations. There are also labels from all walks of life, allowing them to live under the shadow they should not have.

患 || Public or invisible discrimination against the new crown patients, let the unfortunate pressure of the virus infected the virus, the pressure of the illness of the disease, the illegal system, human nature, and ethics. The negative demonstration effect it brings will deepen Fear of fear, after being afraid of infection, he also encountered "social death".

In the bathroom of Shanghai Hongqiao Railway Station, a group of special people lived. They are migrant workers who have been infected with new crown pneumonia, and they cannot find a job after recovery. Because of "Yang", no company dares to hire. It is so stretched. In a screenwriting article, their situation was seen. "Don't have to go through the cabin, don't enter the cabin." This kind of discrimination against the new crown patients is not uncommon in the Shanghai labor market.

This is not a case, nor is it Shanghai, but Shanghai has been infected with large infections in the recent wave of epidemic, which is even more prominent. If you are enlarged again, except for this kind of blatant discrimination, invisible discrimination has always been there, such as the "catching sheep" written behind the big white clothes, the "Xiaoyang people" between people talk about the trajectory of the patient on the Internet, the recovery person returns to the return of the recovery. The subtle neighborhood relationship after home -because of one person infection, the entire community is closed and even transferred to isolation. The blame and pressure behind this are not unable to feel the parties. Some communities have even formed the practice of public apology from the infected residents.

Shanghai officials responded at a press conference on July 11 that such discrimination was illegal and required all units to treat the new positive rehabilitation in accordance with laws and regulations. There are also labels from all walks of life, allowing them to live under the shadow they should not have.

But what is the discrimination of the new crown patients? Only by changing the soil that breeds discrimination can the situation of the recovery be truly improved.

From the most realistic level, some companies in Shanghai are unwilling to hire new recovery. They are worried that in case of "Fuyang" and according to the current policies, the company must be closed for two days and the loss cannot afford it. Enterprises also have to take direct responsibility. The community's blame or rejection of the new crown patients is because this is related to whether the residents of the community are closed or separated. There is a paragraph and teased, "Where do you live tomorrow, whether you can go out depends on your neighbor."

Furthermore, nearly three years after the epidemic, people are still too afraid of the new coronary virus. To a certain extent, it is because of the impact of the original strains of Wuhan, which is also related to the Chinese culture and life and death. Epidemic prevention is also a superposition factor.

In this regard, scientific and accurate epidemic prevention is particularly important. Regardless of how the virus mutations are mutated, according to law, science, and accuracy, it should always be a guidelines that are always adhered to. This is an anchor to promote the advancement of epidemic prevention policies with the times and continuously optimize. Wu Zunyou, chief expert of the Popular disease of the China Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, publicly stated in January 2021 that the proportion of the new crown "Fuyang" is very low, about 5%; the contagiousness is not strong, and there have been no cases of dissemination. After a year and a half, the latest version of the prevention and control plan pointed out that when the nucleic acid CT value of the Fuyang person is ≥35, there is no need to manage and delineate the delineation. At the moment when the virus understands deeper and has accumulated richer experience, the relevant departments should come up with more informative data- "Fuyang"? Is the vast proportion of weak positive? Is it decreased over time? How long will the probability be negligible after the probability is low? These studies can not only dispel social doubts, but also the basis for policy adjustment. The more stricter and better the epidemic policies, but the constant balance of cost and effect. Try to reduce the connection effect of the policy under the premise of controlling it, which helps improve the so -called "yin and yang opposition".

Some scholars have proposed that the health code should not be displayed from the institutional arrangement to display the nucleic acid record a month ago. This seems to be a technical problem solving, but it is essentially pointing to an essential question: what is privacy? When people transfer their privacy data because of the needs of the epidemic prevention and control, the scope and depth cannot be expanded infinitely. Only when it is obviously in line with the public interest, there should be a basis for the transfer, and it should not be the public. I have to say that in the privacy protection of the new crown patients, our consciousness is still very weak. WeChat groups often have a flow report with the real name and ID number of patients with diagnosis. This kind of information should not flow out of the source, and it should not be passed on again. The law should be severely punished for this, so that those who violate the privacy are jealous. Only when the definition of privacy is clear and the boundary of privacy transfer is clear, can individuals be reasonable to defend their own rights and interests, and draw salary from the technical level is a clear boundary.

It has happened for nearly three years, and has become a long -term and profound event that affects our lives.We must not only pay attention to its impact on the health of national life, but also see it harm to individual psychology, interpersonal relationships, and social texture.The discrimination of public or invisible discrimination on the new crown patients makes them carry the pressure of illness in infection, and they have the negative demonstration effects of illegal systems, human nature and ethics.After being afraid of infection, he also encountered "social death".These will interfere with the normal flow of staff and hinder economic recovery.A stagnant society will eventually become the "cost" that each of us will face.I want to enter the state -owned enterprise who compete with Apple high -end?In a era in Japan, this end

- END -