The goodwill commitment of the Australian Foreign Minister was relentlessly overturned by the Prime Minister?Speaking without faith, continue to dry it

Author: Battle Law Express

According to media reports, Australian Prime Minister Albanis recently claimed that Australia hopes to rebuild bilateral relations with China, but Australia is committed to safeguarding "national interests" and will not respond to the suggestions made by China on improving relations between the two countries, nor will they be in any of them in any way. The problem changed its position. Earlier, foreign ministers of China Australia met in Bali. According to the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, China has proposed four suggestions to improve relations between the two countries: first, we must persist in China as a partner rather than an opponent. Three parties, fourth, we must adhere to the foundation of a positive and pragmatic public opinion. When talking about Australian Foreign Minister Huang Yingxian's "eliminating bilateral relations" in the meeting, Albanis insisted that Australia will not make any concessions. "This is a constructive meeting, but just take a step forward. . The Australian side's position on all issues has not changed, and we will maintain a constructive attitude. "

Originally, the first Sino -Australian foreign minister meeting for more than 3 years, and the goodwill commitment made by Australian Foreign Ministers in person, was considered an important symbol of the thawing of Sino -Australian relations. Many analysis also made positive interpretations. But now it seems that this is just a carefully arranged "performance". Australia not only did not realize its mistakes at all, but also did not intend to make any changes in China -Australia relations. Like the American master, Australia's perfect interpretation What is "words and no faith." It is such a country that is really shameless. Albanis even blatantly declare that "the Australian side's position has not changed on all issues."

For the four suggestions made by China, if you consider it carefully, you will find that it is very positive, and there is no "coercion" behavior. It can even be said that this is some basic principles that any two sovereign countries should adhere to. But even so, the Australian side is unwilling to respond positively. Among them, the probability of the problem is the third point, that is: persistence is not targeted and not subject to third parties. Inside, if Australia once again makes actions that are not conducive to China because of changes in Sino -US relations, they will violate their commitments. Therefore, Australia simply did not respond. There are nothing to be discerning for other suggestions. This also shows that Australia's foreign policies do not have independence and need to look at the United States.

As soon as the Foreign Minister talked about it, the Prime Minister over there was publicly overthrown. It can only be said that Australia is not a iron plate within Australia, especially in the processing of relations with China. Some groups represented by the Australian industry and commerce community, because there are many benefits in China, will naturally actively promote the warmth of China -Australia relations, but some pro -American elements who like to play with politics will choose to keep stumbling "Together". Therefore, Australia itself is relatively split, and there will be such a dramatic scene, but Australia needs to understand that this is to make articles with Australia's national reputation. In the long run, no one is willing to deal with Australia.

Like Australia, the United States is also a country that is not favorable. Once, in the three joint communiqués, the commitment to Taiwan issues is very clear, but now, the United States has regarded it as nothing. Seven members were sent to Taiwan, and at the same time, other allies countries were sent to interfere with Taiwan issues rudely. In the Iran nuclear agreement, it also did not hesitate to tear, ignoring the joint witness of the five major powers of China, Russia, Britain, France, and Germany. Nowadays, Australia is also learning. It is indeed a Major and small class of hegemonism, but it does not matter. Before Australia wanted to understand, China did not mind continuing to dry it, and we were not in a hurry.

What I did in the United States and Australia made us awakened, that is, do n’t believe what the West has said, even if they have made solemn commitments, they must continue to stare at their actions to avoid being released, because they are the slightest, because they are the slightest. No reputation. Undoubtedly, the easing of China -Australia relations still has to wait, and our countermeasures can continue to increase the time in time.

- END -