"Tan Tan Traffic" suddenly removed, and the original creators faced tens of millions of compensation?The company involved was exposed, and the court began in June 60 times ...

Recently,#近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 may face tens of millions of claims#and other topics.

On July 10, the host of the "Tan Tan Traffic" section Tan Qiao posted Weibo that the video of the column was offline and may face tens of millions of compensation. Tan Qiao wrote on Weibo, "It's a good means." Some netizens said that the copyright is from a TV station. Even Tan Qiao himself has not been uploaded by the TV station, which is illegal. But some people commented, "Original defendant, who, who, not let go of the law program."

Why did "Tan Tan Traffic" be removed? What is the origin of his infringing company?

Moderator Tan Qiaoju was defended by rights

In the Weibo video released by Tan Qiao, he said that "Tan Tan Traffic" has been further popular since last year, and some people have seen the commercial value other than the public welfare law. Tan Qiao said that there was a company called the operating company let go of the video of "Tan Tan Traffic", and the entire network claimed tens of millions of yuan.

According to the China New Finance and Economics, Tan Qiao said that at the current Bilibili Platform (station B), all the two -creation UP owners, or editing and reposting any of the UPs about Tan Tan Traffic are forced to remove the shelves. Theory theory is theory. You can't release the fragments, editing, audio, or comments of "Tan Tan Traffic". Tan Qiao believes, "After the cleaning of station B, as a successful case, the other party will clean up a platform and a platform."

It is understood that the video released by Tan Qiao on station B has reduced from more than 300 to 80. Earlier, the widely known "Uncle Erxianqiao" video played more than 20 million, and now it has also been removed from station B.

As for the compensation he faced, Tan Qiao said that the first reason facing compensation was that the operating company complained to his infringement. The second reason for compensation is that there are some commercial cooperation. He personally faces the contract that cannot be fulfilled normally, which leads to some compensation. Tan Qiao believes that the current "Tan Tan Traffic" who is the copyright party, or who has a proportion of rights and interests, and the authoritative institution is required to determine it. "At the beginning of the production of" Tan Tan Traffic ", no individual or any organization signed this contract or agreement. Then the original creator was my Tan Qiao himself, and the video recorder was a reporter of a camera."

Tan Qiao said that he wanted to figure out whether he enjoyed the right of his due right after the implementation of the new copyright law, and whether the other party who recorded the video could make claims with him or other creators. For the future, Tan Qiao said that in the future, he will continue to do the relevant content of the "Tan Tan Traffic" universe.

Public information shows that "Tan Tan Traffic" is an educated traffic warning program in Chengdu. Because of its features close to the public and the characteristics of humor and humor, it has won unanimous praise from citizens of Chengdu. Many of these classic programs have received warm attention from major TV stations across the country.

Chengdu Radio and Television respond to copyright issues

Regarding the copyright issues of "Tan Tan Traffic", on July 11, upstream news learned through people familiar with the matter that Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd., which claims copyright and requesting the program to be removed from various video websites, has obtained "Chengdu Radio and Television Station" The copyright of the program of Tan Tan's Transportation, "The protection of rights in the law is evident."

The relevant person in charge of Chengdu Radio and Television responded that TV stations have not claimed copyright rights to the "Tan Tan Traffic" program for a long time, and "do not mean that any individual can infringe on it casually."

A person familiar with the matter to the Chengdu Radio and Television provided by the person familiar with the matter shows that the copyright statement of Chengdu Radio and Television Station shows that Chengdu Radio and Television Channel (CDTV-3) is the production unit of "Ping An Chengdu" and "Red and Green Lights" column of "Tan Tan Traffic", "this unit" this unit With all the copyrights of the "Ping An Chengdu" column, the "Red and Green Light" column, and the "Tan Tan Transport" section, if any copyright issue occurs in the above columns, the unit will be fully responsible. "

The authorized letter of Chengdu Radio and Television and Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd. provided to reporters show that "Chengdu Radio and Television Station will have the rights of all works of" Tan Tan Transport "and the right to transfer the above rights, as well as The right to permit the distribution of third parties is transferred to the culture culture. " Among them, the agreement specifically indicates the right to compensate, "the above rights are irrevocable rights."

According to reports, there are professional lawyers related to copyright law saying that although it is contrary to the public's simple emotions, Tan Qiao, as a creator participating in the "Tan Tan Traffic" program, did not specifically stipulate. The copyright does not enjoy any rights. Its commercial use of the "Tan Tan Traffic" program is infringement.

Zhao Hu, a partner of Beijing Zhongwen Law Firm, analyzed to the Beijing Business Daily that because it is unable to know the more information behind the creation of "Tan Tan Traffic", it is impossible to judge the ownership of copyright. If it is a TV station program, the copyright belongs to the TV station. In this case, the host is a staff member, not a copyright owner for participating in the creator. Of course, it depends on the contract agreement between the two parties. If it is completely original and does not involve others, the producer is the copyright owner. The determination related to copyright needs to be determined on the basis of the work.

According to media reports, insiders inside Chengdu Radio and Television said that for a long time, Chengdu Radio and Television has not made any claims on the rights of "Tan Tan Traffic". It has obtained a lot of benefits, which is recognized and does not mean that any individual can infringement casually. "The person also said that the public opinion of the TV station in accordance with the law is noticed. , Research.

On the evening of July 11, Chengdu Radio and Television Entrusted Sichuan Junsheng Law Firm issued a statement. Chengdu Radio and Television stated in the statement that the relevant rights protection work was awarded to Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd., and rights protection only conducted the company operating entities that did not profit without permission. Ten million ".

Refers to the announcement of Tan Qiao's Infringement Company from June

What is the origin of Tan Qiakou's Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd.?

The Tianyancha APP shows that the company involved "Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd." was established in 2018. The legal representative is Zhang Yuhang. The company's business scope includes: educational management; education information consulting; (excluding education and training and extracurricular counseling services); corporate management consulting; organizational culture and art exchange activities; conferences and exhibition services; advertising design, production, and agency release (excluding include inclusive include inclusive Balloon advertisement and fixed form printing advertisements); house intermediary services; market research; intellectual property services, etc.

According to reports, Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd. has announced more than 60 infringement related announcements since June. At the time of the eyes of the eyes, there were 61 "Announcement of Prosecution of others or the company" of Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd., and Station B, Migu, Xiaohongshu, Sohu, Youku, etc. all became the defendants. In addition, the company has a total of 86 cases of infringement of the information network dissemination of the work.

At present, Tianyan Chada shows that Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd.'s "Announcement on the Prosecution of others or the company" shows a total of 60 cases in Tianyan. At present, there have been 85 cases related to the dispute over the infringement of the information network communication rights of the work.

Regarding the prosecution involving "Tan Tan Traffic", some company legal persons had given feedback to the upstream news, and their own company had reposted and played the defendant of the "Tan Tan Transport" to the court, and finally spent 5,000 yuan to reconcile. On July 11, Chen Xing, a legal person in Sichuan Jingshong Advertising Co., Ltd., told the upstream journalist that their company was reposted by the "Tan Tan Transportation" program and was by Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd. with "infringing the right of work information network communication right" Prosecution, finally reconciled. Chen Xing said: "It is estimated that many companies are afraid of trouble, and they will also choose to settle down.

It is worth noting that public information shows that the registered capital of Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd. involved in the incident is 500,000 yuan. Essence In response, lawyer Hu Xiaofeng, a Beijing Mingshun Law Firm, told the reporter upstream that if the company paid the capital 0, the number of employees paid by social security was 0, and without substantial operations, it did not rule out the suspicion of the company's "empty shell".

In addition, according to the address registered by Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd. on the national corporate credit information publicity system, some media conducted field visits on the morning of July 11th. It was found that a street clothing store was operating here. All residents live. The owner of the clothing store told that she had opened a store here for four or five years. Before that, it was a house intermediary. She had never heard of Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd. The landlord of this shop also said that he had never heard of the operating company and did not rent the house to it. Several shop owners who have been driving for many years have also said that they have not heard of operating companies.

After the incident, a reporter from Beijing Commercial Daily repeatedly called Chengdu Tourism Culture Communication Co., Ltd., but the other party's calls were "the call you called in the call." At the same time, the reporter also contacted Tan Qiao, but as of press time, he had not received a response.

Edit 丨 Wang Naixin Comprehensive Beijing Commercial News (Reporter Zheng Rui), China News Network, Upstream News, Polar News, Weibo@编 编, Chengdu Business Daily

Picture 丨 Tan Qiao Weibo Video Screenshot, Upstream News Client Screenshot, Bilibili Screenshot, Sky Eye Check Screenshot, Weibo Screenshot

- END -