Cover comment 丨 Selecting a civil servant should take the lead in protecting the rights and interests of the "non -full -time" graduates

□ Jiang Yanzheng

The reporter sorted out the recent announcement of the selection of civil servants released in many places and found that many of them required "a bachelor's degree in general universities and universities with a bachelor's degree or above". However, the "Public Selection Measures for Civil Servants" does not stipulate that only a full -time education can apply for the exam. Many interviewed experts believe that the "Selection Measures" does not stipulate that only a full -time academic qualifications can apply for civil servants. In some places, the practice of restricting non -full -time academic qualifications is biased. It should ensure that the relevant national regulations should be truly implemented in the actual implementation. (Rule of Law Daily)

In accordance with the "Public Selection Measures for Civil Servants", "college students" and "non -full -time academic undergraduate" can participate in the recruitment of civil servants fairly. However, in reality, when many local agencies are recruited, they will be added every time to clearly set the starting point of the application as "full -time undergraduate and above education". Bounce.

From a legal level, non -daily undergraduate and full -time undergraduate have the same status and equivalent academic qualifications. The two only have different learning methods, and there are no differences in high and low. The selection of civil servants in many places requires a full -time academic qualifications. It is a bit discriminatory. Such practices are self -explanatory for the psychological damage and opportunities caused by the majority of non -full -time graduates.

Needless to say, the legal rights and interests of non -daily academic qualifications have not been fully fulfilled in reality. The fundamental reason is that the "dwarf" and "low look" of social understanding. The value of the diploma and degree certificate is preset and constant. However, in the actual scenario, there will still be a process of "recognition and acceptance". The more that, the more the institutions and institutions at all levels need to take the lead in response and demonstrate themselves, and to promote the value effectiveness of "non -full -time undergraduate education" with the real "one -regard".

The reason is simple. As a university of non -full -time undergraduate education organizers, and an organ and unit as an employer, the two belonging to a broad public system, the two should be logically self -consistent and coordinated. The competent education department has repeatedly emphasized that "effectively protects the employment rights and interests of graduates, and it is strictly forbidden to release discriminatory information such as learning methods (full -time and non -full -time)." When some local agencies and units are recruited, they know that they cannot do it. They are naked rejected the reference qualifications of non -full -time undergraduate education. In recent years, it has made great progress in itself.

In this way, it should be corrected as soon as possible to truly protect the rights and interests of graduates in fair competition and equal employment.

- END -