U.S. Secretary of State Brills said that the relationship between NATO and China is one of the most complicated and most important relationships with all countries. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded

On July 6, 2022, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference

CCTV reporter: Recently, U.S. Secretary of Secretary of U.S. Student Brinchen said at the NATO Public Forum that the relationship between NATO and China is one of the most complicated and most important relationships with all countries. This relationship is obviously competitive in some aspects We must ensure that competition is fair. China is trying to destroy international order based on rules. We do not seek conflict, but we are trying to ensure the international order based on rules. what opinions do the Chinese have on this issue?

Zhao Lijian: The Secretary of State Brinken regards the facts about the facts, reversing black and white, full of cold war thinking and ideological prejudice. China firmly opposed. I want to emphasize three points:

First of all, China has always been the builder of world peace, the contributor to global development, and the maintenanceer of the international order. China has not invaded any country, never engaged in the war of agent, never participated in or forms a military group, and did not intend to compete with who to compete with each other. In order to confuse the world, the United States has tightened NATO, rendered competition against China, and provoked group confrontation. This kind of words and means are not clever, even more unpopular, and will not succeed.

Secondly, Brinken's speech claimed that NATO "did not seek conflict", which was very hypocritical and did not conform to the facts. The history of NATO is a history of constantly creating conflicts and warfare. From Bosnia -Herze, Iraq, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Ukraine, NATO claims to be defensive organizations, but in fact, it is constantly breaking through the region and boundaries, arbitrarily waged war, harmful to damage None of the innocent civilians have changed. It turns out that it is not China's "systemic challenge" that constitutes NATO, but that NATO is increasingly constituted a "systemic challenge" of world peace and security.

Third, the so -called "rules -based international order" in the United States is actually a household rule formulated with a few countries, and it is a private interest in the United States. The United States requires other countries to abide by international order, but blocks the negotiations of the United Nations's "Prohibition of Biological Weapon Conventions" to negotiate and refuses to approve a number of international conventions such as the Convention on Children's Rights. The United States has always spent domestic law above international law. This is the greatest damage to international order.

We were telling NATO, letting go of the superstition of superstition, and abandoning the plot of chaotic Asia -Pacific.

We advise the United States to confidence in China, abandon conflict confrontation, and really put the "four unintentional" statements made by President Biden to implement it.

- END -