The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is telling NATO: abandon the plot of messy Asia Pacific

On July 6, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian presided over a regular press conference.

According to a reporter, U.S. Secretary of Secretary of the U.S. Subcin said at the NATO Public Forum that the relationship between NATO and China is one of the most complicated and most important relationships with all countries in some aspects. Competition is fair. China is trying to destroy international order based on rules. We do not seek conflict, but we are trying to ensure the international order based on rules. what opinions do the Chinese have on this issue?

In this regard, Zhao Lijian said that the Secretary of State Brills regarded the facts about the facts, reversing black and white, full of cold war thinking and ideological prejudice. China firmly opposed.

Zhao Lijian introduced the Chinese position from several aspects: First, China has always been a builder of world peace, a contributor to global development, and a maintenanceer of international order. China has not invaded any country, never engaged in the war of agent, never participated in or forms a military group, and did not intend to compete with who to compete with each other. In order to confuse the world, the United States has tightened NATO and rendered competition against China. It is not clever, and it is unpopular and not succeed.

Secondly, Secretary of State Brills said that NATO "does not seek conflict", which is very hypocritical and does not conform to the facts. The history of NATO is a history of constantly creating conflict and warfare. From Bosnia and Herzegovina to Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Ukraine, NATO claims to be defensive organizations, but it is actually continuously breaking the region and boundaries, and the war will be launched. No trace of changes in innocent civilians. It turns out that it is not China's "systemic challenge" that constitutes NATO, but that NATO is increasingly constituted a "systemic challenge" of world peace and security.

Third, the so -called "rules -based international order" in the United States is actually a household rule formulated with a few countries, and it is a private interest in the United States. The United States requires other countries to abide by international order, but blocks the negotiations of the United Nations's "Prohibition of Biological Weapon Conventions" to negotiate and refuses to approve a number of international conventions such as the Convention on Children's Rights. The United States has always spent domestic law above international law. This is the greatest damage to international order.

In the end, Zhao Lijian emphasized that we were telling the NATO, letting go of the superstition of superstition forces, and abandoning the conspiracy of the Asia -Pacific. We advise the United States, to be aware of China, abandon conflict confrontation, and really put the "four unintentional" statements made to implement it, and take the positive road of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win -win cooperation.

- END -