Practitioners of tenants, free owners, dual standards for charges?Lawyer response: Yes

Live in the same community

Practitioners and owners are facing different charging standards

This makes the tenant shout

Ms. Chen has been rented in Happy Star City, Hongshan District, Wuhan for more than four years. For a long time, the community has exempt the parking fee for the owners. Before this year, as long as the tenant landlord paid the property fee on time, the tenant could also enjoy the benefits of free parking fees.

However, there are new changes this year. The community no longer exempts parking fees for tenants. Only the original owners can enjoy this offer.

This difference makes Ms. Chen feel very unfair. So, how do other residents in the community think about the practice of property?

The reporter found an owner in the Happy Star City Community of Hongshan District. The owner said that he stood at the perspective of the owner and felt that as long as there was a preferential condition for the owner, as long as the property policy was for the owner, they supported them.

Another tenant in the community expressed the opposite idea: "I think it must be a bit unfair to this. After all, the tenants also pay the money, and they should also have the same rights as the owner."

Ms. Chen said that if the parking fee is charged in accordance with the property standards, she needs to pay nearly 300 yuan except for the rent every month. If the property insists on this, they will choose to replace the rental community.

Obviously living in the same community, the owner is free of parking fees, but tenants have to pay the parking fee. Why should the property formulate such a policy?

The manager of the community property king explained that Happy Star City is mainly a house in Yaojialing Village. Most of the owners of the community are villagers in Yaojialing Village. According to the contract, the property is a parking management fee of 280 yuan for all vehicles. That is, the original owner gave a discount for parking fees, and tenants did not have any right to enjoy this discount.

Manager Wang said: "I am within the scope of the contract, which fixed groups I discount, is there no problem?"

Is such a proper approach? Is there any problem with such double charging standards?

Li Honghua, a lawyer of Hubei Xinwei Law Firm, said: "The property does not charge some users. This is the category of the property of the property, and the property can be operated like this."

Source: Hubei Jingshi

- END -