Every hot review | The construction of the digital government should first make information sharing "run"

The State Council recently issued the "Guiding Opinions on Strengthening the Construction of Digital Government" (hereinafter referred to as "Opinions"). The "Opinions" pointed out that it is necessary to continue to optimize the function of the national integration government service platform, comprehensively improve the level of digitalization and intelligence in public services, and continuously meet the needs of various levels of diversified services in enterprises and the community. Create a general service system. It is necessary to improve the public information platform, and build a policy document library of classified classification, concentrated unity, sharing and sharing, and dynamic renewal. Accelerate the establishment of a new pattern of policies focusing on the online release and other release channels.

Xinhua News Agency map

Digital government is more in terms of software

If the government's footsteps do not follow the pace of the scientific and technological revolution and industrial changes, it will not only greatly reduce the efficiency of administrative work, but also make it difficult for administrative services to improve the level of administrative services. Occupied in a favorable position in fierce market competition.

The "Opinions" pointed out that strengthening the construction of the digital government is an inevitable requirement for the development of a digital government to adapt to the new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial change, lead driving the development of digital economy and digital society, create a good digital ecology, and accelerate digital development. The basic and pilot projects are important measures to innovate the concepts and methods of governance of the government, form a new pattern of digital governance, promote the modernization of the national governance system and governance capabilities. Significant.

From the perspective of the local construction of the digital government, in general, it is still very positive and the enthusiasm is very high. From the establishment agency to financial investment, from hardware facilities to software services, they have given the maximum support, and also put forward clear development goals. In particular, the strong economic strength, at all at all costs to invest in maximum efforts, and strive to get the initiative in the new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial changes.

So, what should we think and evaluate the practice of places in digital government construction? Is a large amount of investment and the effect match? The digital government needs to break through hardware input and software construction, break through the surface, and break through the form. Because the digital government does not buy how much hardware equipment, how much financial resources have been invested, what kind of institutions have set up, and how many professionals have arranged as simple as. In more, the digital government is reflected in software, that is, the service conditions and service methods that can be provided, whether it can achieve the effective improvement of government service efficiency and the quality of service levels. If the hardware conditions are very good, the software services are average, then it is difficult for such a digital government to achieve the goal, it is difficult to reflect the level, and it is difficult to adapt to the trend of a new round of scientific and technological revolution and industrial change.

Should focus on removing information sharing obstacles

In the construction of the digital government, a very important carrier is to share the data and information scattered between the departments, so as to provide the most advantageous services for economic and social development, enterprises, residents, etc. according to these data and information, and the most advantageous services, the most advantageous services, etc. Accurate decision -making basis and the most efficient reference value. If data and information are still scattered in various departments and cannot be shared, then the digital government is difficult to achieve the level of service level and service efficiency from local to overall transitions relative to non -digital government.

It is precisely this very important aspect, and there is still a large gap in actual work. For example, in some places, the ID number has been upgraded from 15 to 18 as early as ten years ago. The provident fund center is still registered with 15 ID card numbers, and residents must go to the provident fund center to serve the counter to modify it. Obviously, this is one of the performances that do not share information between departments. Because after the ID number is adjusted, if information sharing, it should have been automatically adjusted for a long time without the need for residents to adjust at the service counter at the Provident Fund Center. So, how can it be convenient for enterprises and residents to do things?

This is just one aspect. Are there similar problems in other aspects? Is there still a digital gap between the department and the department? Are you still holding a "staying place"? Do you want to prove that your power is still? These need to attach great importance to local governments. It is clear that there are quite a lot of people who have invested in the construction of the digital government in various places. For resource investment, the effect will be greatly discounted and serious waste will occur. Therefore, the author suggested that the effect of the investment in digital government construction must be evaluated. Those who fail to meet the expected goals should be held accountable for the main person in charge of the department.

In recent years, due to the poor economic environment, the government's ability to dominate has also been greatly restricted. Many places' investment in digital government construction has crowded other aspects of funds and saved money. If the purpose of construction cannot be achieved, it must be held accountable for relevant functional departments. In fact, the "Opinions" also pointed out that under the leadership of party committees at all levels, it is necessary to establish a normalized assessment mechanism, take digital government construction work as an important part of government performance assessment, and the results of the assessment as an important assessment and evaluation of the leaders and cadres comprehensive assessment and evaluation refer to. Establish and improve the digital government construction evaluation index system, establish correct evaluation orientation, focus on analysis and assessment of overall management, project construction, data sharing, security, and application effectiveness to ensure the scientific and objectiveness of the evaluation results. Strengthen the follow -up analysis and supervision and guidance, and timely ask the Party Central Committee and the State Council to report reports in a timely manner to promote the sustainable and healthy development of digital government construction. The author believes that a comprehensive inspection should be conducted in response to the data and information sharing of various departments to see what other gaps, which obstacles, and "intestinal obstruction", and where is the crux. As long as the data and information that cannot be disclosed by the law and cannot be disclosed, the data and information should be shared. Otherwise, if the obstacles to set up are human, it must be opened to achieve the maximum efficiency of the digital government construction and the optimization of the service.

Daily Economic News

- END -