What are the tricks of illegal discipline and illegal elements?What are the consequences?

Chuanguan News reporter Chen Song Zhang Tingming

Recently, the website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection was released: Recently, with the approval of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, the National Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection conducted an investigation and investigation of the serious violations of disciplinary violations of the original party group and deputy general manager of China Reserve Grain Management Group Co., Ltd.

Chuanguan News reporters noticed that in the published information, there is such a statement: "After investigation, Xu Baoyi has no ideals and beliefs, has no loyalty to the organization, has a mean political product, has long been engaged in political speculative drilling camps, and has fabricated resumes. , Digging the officials of running the official, and deliberately tentatively tentatively organized the organizational attitude and confront the organizational review. "

The reporter checked the relevant information and found that in fact, "confrontation of organizational review" -the authoritative information on investigating and handling the cases issued by disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies at all levels. Here, the reporter of Chuanguan will talk to you. How are corrupt elements "conscious" for the review and investigation of the organization? What are the common tricks? What are the consequences?

What are the tricks of confrontation with organizational censorship?

There are diverse methods

In January 2022, Hu Xiaogang, former vice president of Great Wall Asset Management Co., Ltd., was "double -opened". Hu Xiaogang, who was published on the website of the Sichuan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, was investigated by Hu Xiaogang, which was published by the Sichuan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection. After investigation, Hu Xiaogang violated political discipline and confronted organizational review.

A few days ago, the Taizhou Municipal Discipline Inspection Commission and Municipal Supervisory Committee of Zhejiang Province was published in the authority of the former member of the former Standing Committee of the Taizhou Jiaojiang District Committee, the former Deputy Secretary of the Party Working Committee of the Dachen Development and Construction Management Committee of Taizhou, and the authority of "Double Opening" of Tao Zhibing, deputy director of the executive deputy director of the Taizhou In the check, Tao Zhibing was a leading cadre of party members, abandoning the ideals and beliefs, losing the principles of party spirit, forgetting his original mission, no consciousness of discipline, unrealistic to the party, serving with others, transferring hidden stolen goods, and consciousness to fight against organizational censorship. "

In order to fight against organizational review and investigation, illegal discipline and illegal personnel can be described as concerned, and there are many ways. Here, Kawaguan Journalists sorted out several methods and tricks of disciplinary and illegal personnel against organizational review based on public notifications and reports.

Method 1: Active cooperation on the surface, but in fact, avoiding heavy. These people are actively confessing on the surface. In fact, they want to cover up big problems through small problems, and look forward to using it to pass the level. For example, Yan Qiansheng, former deputy director of the Agricultural Committee of the Hengyang City of Hunan Province, signed a fair agreement on the land financing process of many plots, resulting in a serious loss of state -owned assets. When he had the Discipline Inspection Commission investigating the two projects, he took the initiative to explain the situation in the disciplinary inspection authority. Frankly, "I have a job error in these two projects and review the organization!". The survey results confirmed that the fact is not a simple job error, but that he uses his position to facilitate the development of road projects for others to develop road projects, and receives a total of more than 33 million yuan in profit.

Method two: Calked with each other and set an offensive and defensive alliance. These people colluded in private, reached an agreement, and tried to pass the level. For example, in the case of Qiu Xiaohua, the former director of the Xinfeng Police Station of Rao Ping County Public Security Bureau of Chaozhou City, Guangdong Province, more than 10 police officers from Xinfeng Police Station were involved in the case. Driven by the interests of common corruption, the police involved in the Xinfeng Police Station involved in the "offensive and defensive alliance" to fight for organizational review. After Qiu Xiaohua was taken by the Municipal Commission for Discipline Inspection, Huang Yongde and the police discussed the confession with the police in an attempt to cover up crimes. In the end, in the face of a large number of factual evidence, Huang Yongde and the police involved in the case could only truthfully confess to disciplinary violations.

Method three: Provide false situations and cover up the truth. These people know that investigators will not trust their "explanations", so they fictional "stories" and trying to cover up the truth. For example, Mei Moumou, the director of the Management Office of the Zhonghua Mother Cultural Park of Chai Sang District, Jiujiang City, Jiangxi Province, brought relatives to Shizhongshan Scenic Area, Hukou County to use his position to request the scenic area for free ticket fees. After learning that the night after being discovered by the District Commission for Discipline Inspection, he took the unit staff Wang to drive to Hukou County, reinventing the inspection route, simulated inspection plot, and asked Wang to learn the identity of the peers in Shizhongshan Scenic Area. Cooperate with the District Commission for Discipline Inspection. In the end, Mei Moumou's vulnerability was full of vulnerability, and he couldn't stand more and more, so he had to deal with it truthfully.

What are the consequences of a counter -organizational review and investigation?

Seems to leave the way, but in fact, to force yourself to go into a desperate situation

In order to fight against organizational review and investigation, some violations of discipline illegal personnel have come up with the absurd "eighteen martial arts". One of the ways of the former party secretary and director of the Guangxi Hechi Agricultural Mechanization Service Center, Qin Shengxian, one of the ways to confront the organizational censorship is "I don't believe in Marxism -Lenin to believe in ghosts and gods, long -term keen enthusiastic feudal superstition activities, trying to use" 魇 town "and other witchcraft techniques, cursing cases and related related Leaders, pray for fierceness to escape punishment, etc. ".

A discipline inspection cadre who has long been engaged in party members and cadres who has been engaged in disciplinary violations of discipline and disciplinary violations told reporters that in general, there are mainly the following confrontation psychology of cadres who fight against organizational investigations: some are lucky, thinking that they can hide the sky and pass the level; Delay time, expect the "ally" rescue; some "broken jars and broken", simply walking to black. Many violations of discipline and violations know that the problems committed are important, so they choose to fight against the organization to the end.

"These cadres deliberately confront the organizational review and investigation seem to be leaving themselves, but they actually pushed themselves into a desperate situation." The disciplinary cadre said.

The newly revised "Regulations on the Disciplinary Actions of the Communist Party of China", in response to the outstanding issues and new violations of the party governing the party, have added and rewritten a number of punishment regulations in the "six disciplines". The qualitative issues of the counterpart review behavior have a evolution process. Article 24 of the "Communist Party Disciplinary Actions" implemented in 2003 referred to such acts as "interference and obstructing organizational review behavior". Independent violations of discipline are stipulated in the general rules as a plot that can be punished. The newly revised "Regulations on the Disciplinary Actions of the Communist Party of China" expressed such behavior as a confrontation of organizational censorship, and identified it alone as a violation of political discipline. "This fully reflects the political requirements of party organizations in loyalty and honesty, and reflect the characteristics of the party's intra -party review of the party discipline." The punishment stipulates that: Fighting organizational censorship, one of the following behaviors, give warnings or severe warning; if the circumstances are heavy, give the party's position or leave the party for inspection and punishment; if the circumstances are serious Or forged, destroyed, transfer, and hide evidence; those who prevents others from exploiting and providing evidence materials; those who cover the same cases; provide false situations to the organization and cover the facts; there are other countermeasures of the organization.

"Playing with the organization is not a manifestation of ability, and it is the right way to the world for loyalty to the party." The aforementioned disciplinary inspection cadres told reporters.

- END -