Cover comment | Governance of private setting "attractions" is essentially a risk of a tourism market

Jiang Yan

In recent years, some places have not set up "attractions" without relevant departments, and illegally provide tourists with tourists and carry out tourism business activities in violation of regulations. The masses have strongly reflected this. The Ministry of Culture and Tourism have recently issued a notice that it requires special rectification work in private setting up the "attraction" of private settlement. (Voice of China)

"Attractions" are an open concept. In some places, they are not attractions, and more tourists will become attractions. In this regard, "attractions" may be more from market identity. In other words, it can be said that good scenery does not ask for origin. In this case, the so -called "private scenic spot" is very subtle. Some netizens expressed their doubts, such as the "net red punching land" formed by the folk spontaneous formation, etc., cannot the existence? This cannot be generalized.

In many cases, when all parties are mentioning the "scenic spot" of privately, it is actually based on the concept of "scenic spot". We know that the "scenic spot" has a specific meaning and has a formal legal definition. The "Regulations on the Scenic Scenic Area" have a complete set of clear rules for its establishment conditions, identification standards, and approval procedures. In this amount, some "attractions" that have not finished this series of processes are of course privately set up.

The more realistic problem is that many new "attractions" and "attractions" of Internet celebrities today are different from the "scenic spot" in the traditional sense. It has neither famous mountains nor humanistic monuments, but more from scratch. In this case, it is suitable to be managed in accordance with the "Scenic Plotner Regulations", maybe it is yet to be discussed. Nowadays, the boundaries of attractions and non -attractions are becoming more and more blurred. Many emerging popular punching places, tourists are like tide, but it seems really ugly as the "attraction" in the general sense.

The new tourism culture and tourism consumption concept largely subverted the classic definition of the "scenic spot". This is an era of customized "scenic spots" for tourists. Tourists. This is a "tourist punch place" that has been confirmed after the facts, which is not planned and created in advance ... Adapting to this new change, public governance should also be adjusted accordingly, that is, it should not only be entangled in the entanglement in Whether it is a "private attraction" should be directly at the core and define and manage based on more essential indicators. For example, whether to receive tickets, whether you have done an environmental assessment, whether you can ensure safety, whether there are necessary tourism facilities, etc.

Whether it is based on administrative approval or market recognition, the "attraction" should at least be safe and environmentally friendly. Governing the so -called "private attractions" is actually a process of risk risk, in order to prevent the savage development of the tourism industry with disorderly tourism industry, damage to damage, damage to damage. Some more basic value.

- END -