The enterprise paid the case with 122 catties of coins and severely punished the "no problem"

▲ 2019 version of the fifth set of RMB 1 coin pattern. Beijing News Drawing/Yu Fengjun

According to the Sanxiang Metropolis Daily, recently, the Kaifu District Court of Changsha City punished a company in the implementation of a labor dispute case to deliberately redeem the coin payment case.

It is understood that Xiao Lan had previously launched a health management company in Changsha City and was fired for more than ten days. After labor arbitration, the company needs to pay Xiaolan's salary and compensation. However, in order to apply for the executor, the company has exchanged the 10,000 yuan case to 122 pounds of coins. Later, the company's legal representative Wang Moumou was fined 5,000 yuan.

As we all know, due to the lack of integrity and rules of integrity and rules, they either do not pay the accounts, or they still have empty minds to evade their responsibilities after the court's referee takes effect, which greatly damages the rights and legal dignity of creditors.

The authority of the law is realized through the referee and the implementation of the effective referee. The obligation determined by malicious avoidance of the referee is the greatest dishonesty and wanton destruction of the rule of law. If you do not be punished, everyone may become victims, and the cost of social operation will rise significantly.

And how to execute the court's effective referee is obviously determined whether the actor has the key factor in the plot of "playing". Throughout the report, the 122 -kg coin was exchanged by the company's boss instructions through multiple banks. It can be seen that although the company fulfills the case, it has the malice of difficult applicants and judicial organs. It can be said that the behavior not only brings difficulties to the applicant, but also greatly wastes judicial resources.

It is worth noting that the punishment of the company's punishment does not mean that the currency attribute is denied. In reality, there are bus companies and vendors who collect a large number of coins in daily production and operation. The use of coins to pay for the use of coins is not a negative execution or "play".

However, in this incident, coins are not belonging to the currency often used in the daily business activities of the case, and their deliberately exchanging a large number of coins has obvious negative intentions.

In other words, the punishment of the judicial organs is not a selective law enforcement, but a strong punishment for the "play" behavior according to the specific case.

Imagine that if this behavior is indulgent, judicial authority and the legitimate rights and interests of the applicant will be damaged, which is not conducive to building a credit society. Disciplinary behaviors have not only achieved social identity, but also played a warning role, so that judicial authority is colorful.

(Source: Beijing News)

- END -