Li Kelin: The main nature and priority of the European philosophy of philosophy

Original title: Unconscious philosophical border -European philosophy's subjectivity and priority contemporary steering

Summary: Since the theory of unconsciousness has been proposed by psychology, the consciousness demonstration in the philosophy theory has been directly challenged. Unconsciously attempts to be regarded as the opposite of consciousness to prove that people have not understood consciousness so far, and they have not understood the subject with consciousness as the foundation. Meaning. Unconsciously, the basis of the essence of the common experience through the habit of erosion and the absoluteness of the subject, and the clearness of the meaning of the meaning of the dullness in the dark hole in the logic plane by meaningless. Facing the challenge of unconscious psychology, the loss of traditional theory has become a driving force for philosophy reflection on itself and re -determining the core issue. From the maintenance of the phenomenology represented by Husserl to the maintenance of the ancestral subject to the decomposition of the Dedleruze and the priority coupling relationship, the discussion of unconsciousness shows the two theoretical orientation methods: the understanding of the subject from the subject from the subject. Experience constructors have turned to experience bearers, and the explanation method on priority is replaced from essence to generate and breakthrough. From the inside of the theory of consciousness theory, Dellez promotes the self -proliferation of conscious content with complex details, the transcendence of the concept of consciousness, and the boundary set by the theory of consciousness. Phenomenology passes the boundaries of consciousness research through inadvertent consciousness, while post -war French philosophy attempts to break the boundaries of ideas and reshape the mission of philosophy research.

Keywords: unconscious subjective priority belief

Author: Li Kelin, Associate Professor of Philosophy of Renmin University of China (Beijing 100872).

Source: "Chinese Social Science" 2022, No. 8 P68 -P87

Editor in charge: Mo Bin 辑

The unconscious concept proposed by psychology directly questioned the rationality of philosophy's interpretation of consciousness. Psychological analysis theory based on the concept of unconsciousness, such as the analysis of dreams, psychiatric analysis of daily life, or the depression of individuals in social civilization, while revealing the complex structure of the subject, further questioning people's possibility of understanding themselves to understand themselves. , And directly challenged the subject theory and epistemology as the foundation of the philosophy. The response to this crisis constituted one of the core issues of European philosophy in the 20th century. Husserl believes that although the study of unconsciousness must be over the boundary of the phenomenon consciousness description (Grenze), only after the foundation explanation of unconsciousness in the method of phenomenon can be clarified to clarify the misunderstanding caused by unconsciousness.在胡塞尔的意识描述中，被归为无意识的活动包括生、死、梦、本能，这些意识现象本属于哲学理论化最弱的环节，故而如若可以从功能上对无意识进行界定，也就是It is said that as long as an unconscious phenomenon foundation is established, the limit of conscious activities can be determined, and then the reasonable boundary of the phenomenology research object can be finally defined. Deluze asked for this way from the Kant's classification industry. On the one hand, because the thought itself is inertia, it always avoids the boundary of its own effectiveness (Limite), and on the other hand, even if the light of thought can be illuminated by the edge of the dark, with the new light source, as the new light source A new boundary is generated. Any effort to determine the determination of ideology is inevitable into the cycle of self -finger -involvement and self -repetition. Facing the collapse of the theory caused by unconsciousness, the mission of philosophy should not set up a line of defense in a way of distinguishing the boundaries, but to use this gap to reach the external definition of self -definition.

The purpose of the constructive boundary is to distinguish the internal and external, so as to establish the effectiveness of the external confusion when the effectiveness of the order is established inside, so the definition method of the boundary must be required to make choices in self -construction. In the research boundary established by Husserl and Deleuze, they represent two philosophical attitudes facing the unconscious crisis: maintaining the absoluteness of consciousness to defend the transcendence of the subject; , Try the legal edge of subjectivity. From Husserl to Deleuz, from Germany's phenomenon to France's post -structuralism, the change of unconscious theory reflects the inheritance of the theory and the change of position. In the tendency of philosophical ideas for the increasing and stronger theory of unconscious theory, the new subject theory and conscious analysis method gradually form and play a strong explanatory power. Starting from pure experience and priority structures, we present the coordination and differences of phenomenology and post -structuralism in the theoretical and unconscious process, including in the understanding of the core concept, how can the two sides break through the classical demonstration logic and determine the determination of faith. The infiniteness of suspicion in sex.

1. Passive synthesis: from absolute subject to unlimited subject

Before unconsciously became the term of psychology, this concept continued to appear in philosophical texts, and Kant, Xie Lin, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche had talked about unconsciousness. When unconsciously is used to construct the laws of thinking under the interpretation and derivation of psychology, whether it is given a new interpretation function given by this concept or the theoretical system derived from it, in Hussels, it must threaten it to threaten To the basis of logic. He put forward the concept of pure logic in the early "Logic Research", advocating to exclude the interference of knowledge definitation based on experience, and to reshape the basis of logic. Although the law of logic is pure, it is both truthful and practical -these logical laws, as a realistic "associated with the mind experience", are still necessary to explain the occurrence of consciousness. It is also in this perspective that the research of phenomenology inherits the position of logical research, and Hussels also proposes to reshape the "first philosophy" from the basis of philosophy. As the first philosophy, the task of phenomenology is to "a universal scientific start and basic part established from the absolute final root", and the primary task to achieve this task is to analyze and clarify the structure of consciousness. In response to the structure of psychological activity and thinking standards, conscious phenomenology clarifies the inherent structure form of consciousness from multiple angles, including subjectivity, objectivity, interaction subjectivity, and superposition of all angles, and from each angle, and every angle It is divided from the original, secondary, and composite levels, and each angle and each level have the intervention of other perspectives and other levels. They riven together to form the absolute subject of Husserl. At the level of pure experience, the reason why unconsciousness pose a threat to conscious theory is not because of the loss of consciousness in the occurrence of "unconsciousness", but because of the loss of the subject in unconsciousness, the subject has lost the ability to grasp and control consciousness, consciousness, consciousness It appears as a blind impulse or mechanical response that is not dominated by the subject. Then, acceptance of unconsciousness means that the part of the subject of awareness overflows the subject, and recognize the limitedness of the subject relative to consciousness. However, in the conscious structure, the subject is both the initiator of the consciousness and the supporter, which cannot accommodate the dislocation between consciousness and the subject caused by unconsciousness. In response, Husserl proposed that in conscious activities, the subject's participation status did have the difference between initiative and passiveness, and the form of experience was divided into a combination of initiative and the synthesis of passiveness. Active comprehensive showing the conscious structure of its own initiative, "self -initiative, various active rulings, convinced," make yourself convinced 'and favoritism, etc. From the passive perception situation, it is determined to reach the determination of judgment, and then the determination of judgment. "As the subject's self (ICH), it actively gives the perception that it will resume the confidence and make judgments in the perception, and the self -self, and the self's self. The passive form refers to the self -passive reception and unity. The reason why it is passive is because in the state of unimpreced the unity of sensory flow and intention, no motivation must be forced to make a ruling. From the perspective of intention activities, because intentions can always be fully enriched in perception, not only do you have the meaning of perception every moment, but also the expectations generated will also be confirmed in the next moment. The uniform consciousness and appearance continues to expand and promote perception. In the field of experience, such achievements are simply showed by perception, and the subject is just like bystanders who did not actively play a role in consciousness synthesis. Then, despite the passive form, the subject is still potential and not lack of lack. The potential subject will be triggered when the conscious flow encounter, and it is manifested by judgment and ruling.

Husserl showed the subjective state and potential state through active and passive comprehensiveness. In contrast, it is even more important to clarify the way of passive comprehensive subjects. In the experience of experience, the intention of intention from emptiness to fulfilling satisfaction, and the unity between various intentions, the more coordinated and consistent, the more revealing the power of the guidance and organizational intention of the first, the more coordinated, the more coordinated. Called "belief". Husserl's tendency to naturally have a consciousness in the flow. This tendency is entirely from the subject's expectation of certain possibilities, but this expectation has not been rational argument, but it is constantly in the verification of experience. Get strengthened or weakened. The "belief" in passive synthesis shows that even in the most original experience, the organization and unity of the material have occurred, which shows the presence of the main body. The natural flow of consciousness has never been blind, but always has an inherent structural and understandable basis. Of course, the trend of passive synthesis is not always combined with the right realization of the right realization. The perception may be fully insufficient than the empty front camera, and it may also fulfill the surplus. It also maintains harmony, especially the "belief" continues to be effective, so there is no need to take the initiative to participate. On the other hand, the reason for triggering self and active attitude is that the conflict between intentions and perception is seriously to break the unity and harmony of consciousness, and the stagnation of consciousness shows the failure of "faith". Self -persistence means that in the state of this consciousness, self -review of intention and perception and judgment and judgment, setting a new righteous structure to recover the natural flow of re -recovery consciousness. Then the purpose of active comprehensive structure is to restore the inner unity of self, and to return to the natural order of passive synthesis. Passive synthesis and active comprehensive mixing each other, incorporating experience into a unified order at different levels. However, not all experiences can be ruled, and the isolation of these perceived fragments reveals the principle of internal order. In completely unfamiliar experiences, even if perception has reached the limit of self -active structure, the experience is still unspeakable. The expectations are always empty, and even the expectations cannot be effectively aroused. "There are no fusion conditions and specific uniform conditions to be met, so every rejected moment cannot curb the" unconscious ". It is called unconscious feelings revealing the limit of the conscious structure is a uniform limit composed of similarity. Similarity has indicated a connection relationship between the objects, and then the integration is included in the same whole. If the reason for the failure of consciousness structure is the lack of similarity, then the other way can be said to be the condition of the similarities that the consciousness expands the self: in the passive synthesis, consciousness needs to arouse the conviction to generate expectations; Expecting perception structure similarity, re -incorporate it into the order of consciousness. So, is similarity due to the result of conscious structure, or the prerequisite for determining the structure of consciousness? Before similarity appears at the cognitive level, Husserl uses the relationship and control of the two objects to describe the two objects in the flow of experience. Taking resonance as a similar foundation, similarly stays at the cognitive level of objects, and resonance contains multiple levels such as emotion, feelings, desires, etc. It shows that consciousness may be interrelated at any level. Essence From the target that cannot be determined to determine the undoubted object, it reveals the difference in the degree of resonance intensity in the field of consciousness, and at the same time, it also shows the uniform level difference given by new consciousness when integrating into the whole. Then, although unconsciousness is beyond the limits of conscious structure as a complete accident, as far as spiritual activity is concerned, it should still be included in the whole of consciousness, and as a limited range of fullness in the remaining fragments of isolation.

Unconsciously shows that the principle of consciousness construction is similar, and similarity shows the influence of the influence of consciousness as a whole through resonance, thereby showing the power of faith, including the common motivation source of active and persistently. The inspection of the process of experience formation finally pointed to the habit. The comprehensive law of this consciousness constructed: "Belief and all the attachments are of course an event in the flow of consciousness, so obey the first law, that is, the law of 'habit of'." As a precipitation that occurs with similarity, the foundation is all of the current perception, and highlights those more similar materials to the past, so as to gain a comprehensive integration more directly. This view further guides the second understanding of unconsciousness, that is, unconsciousness due to insufficient attention. Unconsciously occurred in this sense at the edge of the field of consciousness. From the center of attention to the edge of the edge is the decrease of consciousness from strong and weak. The difference in this level of consciousness occurs not only in its original granting, but also in the lag of consciousness. That is the process of forgetting. Regardless of the unconsciousness that cannot be constructed as a completely unbelievable constructing, or the unconsciousness on the edge of consciousness, both show the absoluteness of consciousness in a negative way. All consciousness is due to the main organization, and its organizational behavior is first of all out of habits.

The habit, as an unclear manifestation in psychological theory, is often used to prove the discomfort of the subject in action, that is, the mechanical nature of the behavior deny the subject's ability to control consciousness.作为经验基底的习惯，其发生的形式总是被动的和不自由的，由此胡塞尔对于自我的构成做了主体的自由行动和不自由冲动的划分：“个人性自我，在原初性生成The composition of the middle is not only the individual determined by the impulse, as a continuous "impulse" from the beginning and the original "impulse 'and passively conforming to it, but also as a high, autonomous, free action action Self, especially as guided by rational motivation, rather than being a traction and not freedom. "In the composition of self, the reason why rational motivation is advanced is because of its freedom after reflection. Through rational reflection, self can get rid of the inertia of habit. Although the habit is passive, it has also obtained an efficient behavioral ability because it can directly touch the distribution without reflection. It is at this point that Husserl proposed that the subject can get a stronger "I can" by actively cultivating habits. The so -called active habit is to take the initiative to train yourself and get some habit. It and passive habits are based on the same constituent principle: by repetitive repetition of some connection to enable consciousness to automatically have tendencies without reflection. As a result, Husserl established two fulcrum in the same way: the self -self and the habit of nature. And by discussing the "active habit", Husserl returned the passive habits into the scope of the subject to actively give, thus realizing the transcendence of the passive part of the experience composition, and maintained the absolute subject of the subject to the self of the self. control ability. In the structural description of conscious phenomenon, Husserl defines the transitional nature between consciousness and unconsciousness at a degree of degree. Through the hierarchical map of consciousness, unconsciously is allocated to zero consciousness. Husserl's unconscious interpretation denies the lack of the subject advocated by psychology in unconsciousness. Because in the interpretation of psychology, there is a paradox that cannot be overcome: since it is the unconsciousness caused by the absence of the subject at this moment, how can we become the object of consciousness and be discovered by the subject? In other words, the memory of the main body has just proved that the subject has not lost. Not only does not constitute a challenge for the absoluteness of the subject, but in the interpretation of Husserl, it shows the various forms of the subject in terms of experience structure. The absolute understanding of the subject of Husserl is not only reflected in the constructive state of consciousness, whether it is initiative or passive, or that it can be clearly righteous or obscure. The occurrence of the activity has preset the presence of the consciousness bearer. In the field of purely experience, Husserl, with the absoluteness of the subject, eliminated the unconscious subject crisis and denied the method of psychology through inadvertent argumentation of the subject.

Husserl constructed the theory of consciousness with its main body as the core, and recovered the rational subject from the vortex of psychology. Whether the subject of consciousness can assume the starting point of thinking -this is the fundamental question of the Husserl theory. Heidegger faintly revealed criticism of Husserl through the basis and development dimension of the main body of "here". Regarding the reflection of the subject of consciousness, contemporary French philosophy not only inherited the tradition of the Descartes, but also accepted the influence of psychological analysis. From the specific analysis of consciousness, it gradually revealed the crack between consciousness and the subject: or Levinas The belief of adhering to the subject is that the concept of consciousness is not exhausted, or such as Derrida’s "Voice and Phenomenon". Questioning the subject of self -transcendence. Among the many reconstruction consciousness and subject strategies, Deller's theory is the closest to Husserl's interpretation of the process of consciousness, but at the same time, it has performed the opposite theoretical interpretation of the latter's passive synthesis. In Derlerg's view, the passiveness of passive synthesis is not only reflected in the pure acceptability of the subject's perceptual material, but also more importantly, the passiveness of the subject in this synthesis. The composition of this integration is not due to the conscious efforts of the subject, but the spontaneous and automatic interaction between the empirical elements at the sensation level. "Although it has a constituent role, it is not able to move because it is created by the mind. It just happens in the mind that it is still in the mind. From the perspective of the type of experience contained, Deller was accepted the conclusion of Husserl's accustomed to understanding passive synthesis, and the reason for the formation of consent is duplicate. However, compared to Husserl's passive form of the main body to explain the spontaneousness of habits, Deller must completely abandon the subject's participation in habit, but strengthen the foundation role played in the formation of the subject. His interpretation of the non -subject of habit was completed through the concept of meditation, especially with the concepts of the still view of Provetino and Hume.

Contemplation from Latin Contemplatio, Templum, as the root of the root representation, is a sacred place and a sacrifice place. Contemplation means that the soul surpasses the spiritual image and obtains a direct experience of God. This word is used in early Christian text to translate θε kinds of θεωρíα in Greek, which means "inner seeing". For example, in the cave metaphor of the "Ideal Country", Plato uses θε kind to show the soul to watch. When θεω 被íα was transformed into CONTEMPLATIO, the individual's internal province was also given mysterious production function. The most typical interpretation of this is Provetino. Provenino criticized Aristotle's meditation as the highest part of the soul of man, and advocated that the quiet view expanded from rational life to irrational life, that is, everything is a meditation. For example, in the 3rd volume of the "Nine Chapters", Provetano explained how naturally came from Taiyi through a quiet view, showing that the still view was a top -down production chain. Naturally, as the low -level part of the soul of the world, since it is far from the light source of Taiyi, how can it start a quiet view? Proveno emphasizes that the view is not based on the principles of rationality, because if this is the case, it will cause the view to become a crisis of imitation and analogy, and then lead to a crisis of life convergence. Once the rationality is excluded, the view of life shows the activities of mixed materials for the quality of the material out of nature. Naturally, through the random gathering of materials such as sunlight, water, soil, etc., it is turned into objects, showing a colorful plant -its creation does not require knowledge, only in the inner life impulse. Deleuze further applied Provetino's natural stills to all the sensory phenomena of all sensory activities, and the still view was developed into the growth of life instincts. In order to combine this vitality theory and epistemology, Dellez found a connection point for meditation and knowledge in Hume's theory. Hume's "Theory of Humanity" uses a quiet view to describe the inherent activity of the soul. After Hume's remarks on the still look at the observation, after the continuous occurrence of these two actions, the psychological comprehensive process of observing the object from the outside to the internal reflection was completed. And in the process of self -experience, there is more feelings than the experience itself. Hume explained the psychological roots of morality with the duality of this observation and meditation. The difference between moral evil and goodness, in Hume's argument, is from the pain and pleasure caused by different behaviors and character in the heart. Although there is no predetermined organizational rule in the meditation view, the experience is derived from the experience of gathered with each other, and it is brewing the choice made in different rational principles and even the constitutional principle of thought. In terms of demonstrating how one thing causes another thing, the connection between Hume and Hussell on the surface is similar to similarity. After the resonance vague explanation, this similarity must be used to achieve rational guidance for the subject, and Hume takes the reasons for repetitive impression as the cause of the habit, and the basis of habit as the law of causality -this important reason for rational inevitable laws Therefore, the challenge of reason as the principle of congenital is realized, and the challenge of the knowledge foundation is also realized. So Hume has not only reinterpreted the formation of rational concepts through the concept of habit, but also transplanted its root within the framework of empirical interpretation. At the same time, even if it is simple in form, it is performed. The result of contraction, and this contraction occurs from repeated experience.

Repeatability still rely on the similar phenomenon of experience in Hume's interpretation. After absorbing Hume's experience on habit, Deller re -constructed it from the perspective of conscious activities, so as to highlight the shrinking and combination caused by the habit in the soul. effect. The hybrid and condensation of the various materials proposed from the perspective of Price in the soul and Provetano expressed the productivity contained in the still view from different levels, and was eventually uniformly uniformly unified by Deleuze to occur in the flow of experience flowing. The contraction effect has become a habit in this contraction. The habit is the contraction of experience generated in the still view. In the internal synthesis of the quiet view, there is neither setting as the subject of judgment or action, nor setting the corresponding object, and this kind of unknown unconscious state as the beginning and basis of experience. The establishment of the world and the formation of the subject are after the results of the element condensation and differentiation process from this vague state. More precisely, in the unconscious state, it gradually aggregate and crystallize through automatic contraction. As far as the process is concerned, all the existences are the contraction of many experiences. The contraction is not only a multi -superposition and aggregation, but also the general analysis of the soutire. Although the contraction is formed according to past experience, it appears in the future, or it can only fully play the role of contraction when it extends to the future expectations. "Because each contraction and each passive synthesis constitute a symbol that is explained or displayed in various capable synthesis." Through the experience nodes condensed by passive synthesis, these contracted compounds stand as the subject of active synthesis as the subject of thinking and action. In this sense, passively comprehensively supports active synthesis in a priority manner, maintaining the continuous flow of current experience. Especially when passive integration is used to enrich the initiative, the current experience not only obtains the inner expectations, but also has also been given the inherent driving force of action. At this point, Dellez is different from Husserl's view of habits and freedom. For Husserl, the urge and rational freedom brought about by the habit can be parallel, and the subject has absolute freedom to choose not to follow the impulse. However, for Deleuze, the freedom of rationalism does not completely explain the motivation of self -domestication with the principle of habit formation, which means that the explanation given by rationalism has the possibility of infinite refractions. Unless admitting that the initial motivation comes from the accidental choice of automatic implementation between various feelings in unconsciousness, it is difficult for rationalism to jump out of the vortex of decisive theory, and to bear the risk of completely losing freedom. As a passive synthesis, for Dellez, while constituting experience, it also has a solid certainty in self -repetition, so that it can be beyond the mixed and changes in the feelings, showing the existence of existence existing existence Knowing and dominating ability. Husserl understood this as faith, but Deller thought that the habit was the subject of buds, which needed to grow into the main body. The self -laiding self is like an automatic execution system, and the main possession habit is like accepting this operating system. Dellez has a tendency to "materialize" for habits and the main body. In fact, in "Anti -Odipus", he directly defines people as "desire machines". This is because in his opinion, the adhesion state between people and the world cannot be divided. Even the transcendence that the subject faces the existence, it can still re -meet the opposition of the subject and the existence on the other level. , Cutting them in a state of coexistence. The main body of Deller is just a vortex that temporarily converge in the experience of experience. Compared with the pure and universal subjects pursued by Hussels, what Deller is going to present is that the subject is always surrounded by many and special. It comes from experience, which stems from existence. Although Husserl's conscious theory, through unconsciousness as the surplus of habits, that is, the excess fragments outside the construction of consciousness, implying the complexity and richness of the conscious structure, he eventually recovered with the absolute consciousness absolute recycling. UNOT of UNOL. Deller wants to re -open the unrealistic escape power, whether it is the habit of the automatic contraction in the experience of the experience, or the meaning of the meaning of the formation under the self -constructing of the habit. Formation needs to depend on habits and objects. It is the ability to deal with objects in the automatic automaticness, and the individual is manifested as the subject on the node of the experience. Compared with Husserl's absolute subject, the dominant is always on the experience of the unified camera. The main body of Deller's in the fluctuations and deaths with the flow of experience, he generated infinite possibilities of the subject in an unlimited way.

The attempts of the absolute subject with infinite subjects are still essentially the limited and inevitable of surpassing rationality with unlimited and accidental surpassing rationality. However, in order to achieve this transcendence, experience is also expected to be extraordinary experience, such as the "quiet view" experience borrowed by Deleuze, and his reference for his literary and artistic experience in other texts. As a result, the post -war French philosophy has the reliance on extreme experience in argumentation. In addition to artistic experience, it can also include theological experience, mental illness experience, and pleasure experience. Essence These extreme experiences may break the boundaries of rationality with superimposed intensity, or to resist the definition of rationality with more miscellaneous mixed. Furthermore, the relationship between the subject and the object also changed fundamentally. The absolute subject takes the conscious structure as the core. The experience of the object must first return to its inner consciousness as the basis of the cognitive object. The unlimited subject formed by the extension is to hollow out the internal nature of the subject, and place the priority of thought on one end of the external object, and try to express the different forms of the subject under the stimulation of the object. The latter thinking constantly breaks the boundary of the philosophical demonstration, and has a rich and diverse experience of fulfilling the monotonous and emptiness with a variety of experiences. However, the risk of followed is that the philosophy theory is gradually away from the concept, and it has begun to lose its universality, while the description of a stagnant experience and the rendering of emotions. Behind this theoretical transformation, on the one hand, it is to get rid of the requirements of universal and abstraction for rationality, but on the other hand, it is a philosophical reflection on the current instant and local experience. Getting rid of the requirements of universal and abstraction can ideas integrate yourself into specific actions and realize the power of thought. This is the self -demand of French philosophy after the war. Second, priority: from essence to generating structure

The passive and comprehensive automatic effects in the conscious structure have implied the priority field of experience formation, and also proposed the possibility of reflection habits -the possibility of natural attitude. Husserl completed the demonstration of priority restoration through the method of conceptual theory, and as a result, it also completely denied the theoretical hypothesis of the loss of the subject in unconscious.

As a summary introduction of phenomenology research methods, the phenomenology of Hedell for "British Encyclopedia" has a total of four editions in the last four editions, which highlights the priority methods proposed by phenomenology based on the ability to transcend the natural attitude. Analysis of conscious structure based on experience, this experience phenomenology is still not enough to support the entire mission of the first philosophy alone. The description of the conscious structure must be checked by the priority phenomenon to clarify the source of the object given in the experience, and exclude those transcendences from the outside, to completely reflect on the world's consciousness of consciousness, to achieve the consciousness of consciousness. That is out of conscious self -structure. The natural attitude shows that our non -rebellious daily lifestyle in the world. In this way of lifestyle, we will not question the certainty of the world or the overall meaning of life, but therefore can be safe. Land occupies a certain area of ​​the world and embeds his life into the world. However, the attitude of priority phenomenology is to break away from this daily attitude in a suspended manner.

Get rid of the natural attitude through the suspension method, temporarily putting various beliefs in the natural attitude aside. The purpose of the Husserl's suspension method does not end or cancels the perception of perception. The faith in the passive synthesis discussed above, and the significance construction method obtained under its organization, eventually appeared as an individuality of self -experience in the way of experience, and the method of suspendedness is to gradually rule out these The individual experience model reaches the general consciousness, that is, the pure consciousness that is open to all subjects. In the natural attitude, it contains the individual perspective in Leibnitz's sense, so the remaining consciousness is used as a pure psychological general consciousness by putting the particularity in consciousness and experience, that is, to get rid of the personal limited pure subject, Essence On the basis of the innocence and universality of the psychological consciousness structure presented by general consciousness, phenomenon has become the strictest science of human consciousness research, and provides the basis of legitimacy and self -confidence for other sciences. General consciousness, this concept, as a goal to be reached as a priority restoration, means that the originality set by phenomenology is the absolute basis of the experience reached after the uncertainty of the phenomenology. And the main body corresponding to this experience. It is worth noting that whether it is a priority restoration method or the main body obtained from this, Husserl has borrowed Cartesian's reflection method and its "Cogito" style in terms of methods and goals. The main body, but more importantly, Husserl's priority is not only the logical premise of experience, but also the subject of consciousness, especially the subject that sets and develops reflection. Husserl believes that Descartes' "I think" is still a metaphysical question that starts for the existence of the self, and what it ultimately determines is still in the simple and empirical sense. The goal set by Husserl for the first verification is the pure self that restores everything: "Instead of living in a simple place, and simply implementing this existence, I am purely as a bystander who does not participate, observe this life as a life as a life as a life as a life as a life as a life as a life as a life as a life as a life as a life as a life as a life. Onlookers, I put everything in the brackets. " Although Husserl's suspension method maintains the skepticism of Descartes, the "priority self" obtained by the former is not only a complete doubt about the world, and overcoming the latter's natural attitude as the premise of the existence of the world. At the same time, it is at the same time. During the restoration, the re -structure of the world and self -relationship. In this sense, Husserl's priority, as an absolute origin, realized the transcendence of Descartes "I think". Phenomenology restore is to gradually reveal the belief of the individual in the process of "priority self". Instead, it presents the overflow of conscious content. Husserl tried to obtain the original point of the experience through the theory of transcendental restoration and the richness of the experience. The theoretical value pursued by this idea is undeniable, but it is also impossible to deny that it is self -folding in this method. The self -reflection proposed by the priority method inevitably split self -splitting as the subject and the object of thinking. In the process of the subject's inspection, in the process of improving himself from the immersion of the world, the different levels of the experience structure that gradually revealed the experience structure included both experience and facts, the intention activities and intentions of consciousness, and at the same time There are also conscious activities that are ignored because of "immersing in the world", such as the habits and marginal weak consciousness as mentioned above. To understand the method of testing the subjectiveness by reflection is a systematic and completely self -revealing. Reflection presents the beliefs or habits of daily self, and this presentation also develops a legitimate explanation on the daily state of self. Then, the suspended world is explained by the reflection of the priority, and the whole self -consistent experience is formed by the rationality of its composition. Although the world obtained on the basis of self -reflection is based on self -experience, self -experience has been given universal understanding after explaining clarification. And the first condition of all universality is the effectiveness of "I", and the understanding of "I" has already included the existence of others and the world in advance, or that the world itself is the existence of the overall meaning. Then the world obtained through priority reflection and the overall significance presented will support the presence to restore penetration of the hidden individuality, and to achieve the transparent starting point of all experiences, the so -called brightness.

But it is also in the understanding of clear opinion that potential has a strong vagueness: the goal that the clear opinion is achieved as a priority restoration is to resist the certainty of all doubts, and at the same time, it is also in the process of restoration. He is constantly being questioned with simplicity perception of "self -consciousness". For example, PHILIPP Berghofer and others advocated the connotation of clearly insightfulness with the "original seeing", and then determined the complete clarification and determination of the conscious self -consciousness to attribute the insight into the mind. Understanding of the psychological perspective. If we examine the source of insights, EVIDENCE, from Latin Evidens, and the latter originated from the verb VIDERE/see it, it will indeed accept whether in the original meaning or in the sense of extension. It reveals that it does originated from "insight" or intuitive. But does it become an objective standard for performance? In the so -called "original seeing" or "original granting", what is it or given? Is it pure thing, or the concept of consciousness? And in the determination of observation, is the determination of the determination about the complete grasp of things, or is it sufficient meaning? Although the answers to these questions are controversial, the reason why Hussels propose clearly is because this concept expresses the ideal state of awareness and approximate objects. Understanding, so clear opinion has become, and more accurate is the starting point of the preset as knowledge. To this end, observation -this state of mind -include two aspects: the observation of the manifestation, and the clearness of the object given. These two aspects are indeed in line, so that we can affirm ourselves to grasp the object of the object is the original grasp of the original nature, which has ruled out the spiritual projection of the external imagination and belief. In this sense, insights are simple, but it is simple and different from unprepared experience. The latter hides complex external sexual ideas, including personal experience and position. The absolutely granted nature of observation -includes the original giving of the manifestation and manifestation, that is, the phenomenon and the object -the ideal state of the subject close to the object, and it is also a common state of the consciousness of this object. state. However, the main body in the state is not empty, and its consciousness is not without any presets, otherwise it will not be able to "grasp" the object. However It is found in the world that has been given in advance, and this world provides beliefs: "The world will always be in the front of the belief in the vastness [Doxa], and provide beliefs for all individual judgments [GLAUBEN ] Basic, this world is a base that can be directly grasped from the bottom layer as the bottom layer. "In this way, Husserl brought us back to the problem of faith and returned to the active synthesis and passive synthesis. Although Husserl's priority restoration method is first to hang the beliefs and habits in the natural attitude, at the end of the priority restoration, the stubbornness of habits and beliefs appeared in the base of experience. Active self no matter how you can completely get rid of the passive self, the priority restoration of consciousness cannot resist the return of unconsciousness. If a conscious analysis is finally caught in an unconscious sand, Husserl can choose to use the concept of determination as the core of visibility and re -build an experience to determine and reliable bases. This is exactly the "Hidden Special Special" proposed in the Vienna Lecture: "Our European humanity is inherently a hidden special, which is generally dominated by European morphological changes and gives it a meaning of meaning. That is, the ideal form and form of existence of the ideal of the extreme point of the eternal point. "The concept of Europe is that ideas can surpass experience, subject to grasp the inherent basis of objects, but if these concepts cannot prove their absolute and eternal, then these in these are these in these these, then these are in these in these. The experience built in concepts and the significance of transcendence of experience will always usher in the time of collapse. This is the real crisis of European human nature. The observation of Husserl's arrival is doubtful, but the method of priority restoration still reveals the complex relationship between the subject and the world. The pre -granted world provides beliefs and habits, and provides significance for the formation of experience. As pointed out in the questioning of observation, the significance of being given in advance can still be put into further questioning and will continue to doubt. This is exactly the way Deleuze continues the reducing Husserl. Dellez's interpretation of meaning can be divided into two levels. The first level is to stand on the premise of the same position as Husserl, meaning as a priority structure of experience; the second level is how Deluze further questioned the meaning of meaning, and tried to explain the meaning of unintelligue meaning. In the field of priority as an answer to this question. Let's talk about it next.

Regarding the understanding of priority, like Kant and Husserl, Deller also believes that the priority proposes brings the condition and limited thinking of knowledge, but the category of the priority and Marceria proposed by Kant The priority principles of Erxin still stay at the perspective of the subject to analyze the formation of knowledge and consciousness. As Husserl showed, the main body of the priority is the European subject, retaining the historical development history of Europe, and being satisfied with the "creation of priority" from the factors of experience. Kant and Husserl's priority theory can fully explain the principles of knowledge and consciousness, but they have not fully explained their own explanations themselves. In Deller's understanding of the priority, experience and significance are not homogeneous. As far as experience is concerned, as far as the daily experience, its composition, as Husserl, always gives the meaning of pre -giving. Along this clue, Dellez proposed to explain the meaning first -the meaning and order of experience, and constitutes the understanding of experience. Both the understanding of Priority and Husserl's understanding of the new Kantism, but the difference is that Kant discovered the category of priority in the field of priority. Structure, the understanding of the two in the field of priority is common and determined, but Deller wants to change the conviction of priority as a certainty and universal nature. The first thing he must point out is Husserl's concept of European concepts. Perseverance comes from the unprepared fit of meaning and experience, that is, "priority intimacy". The completely fit between meaning and experience -meaning is fulfilling in this state, and experience is also certain in this state. The relationship between the two of the two is the original point of the conscious activity of Husserl. So it is a consciousness; from the perspective of Dellez, since this relationship is gradually appearing through the restoration, and in the process of restoration, the purely intended objects that are gradually peeled out shows the independence of independence itself. Sexuality is different from the object of experience and the perception of the subject, thereby opening the cracks between meaning and experience. Taking color as an example, although the colors are often used as predicate in the proposition, it means that for the state of the state of the subject, the color is not the attribute of the object's own, but the effect of the human vision, but as a language expression, it is used as a language expression, but as a language expression, it is used as a language expression. The significance given by color can only be used as generally used, and it does not effectively express the uniqueness of the color seen by the subject. Because of this, the distance between the meaning and experience of this first -to -give is showed. The distance between meaning and experience shows the independence of meaning relative to experience. The extreme of meaning independence is the rigidity of meaning, that is, the meaning is completely out of experience, becoming an empty opinion. The spirit of reflection inherited by philosophy is to continue to break the opinions of opinions, especially those worship of the opinions of eternity and center. On the one hand, Deleuze supported Husserl's suspension of the natural attitude through pre -verification, because this suspension showed the break of ideas and opinions, and thus opened a critical space for the thought itself. But at the same time, Deller believes that in the reasoning of Husserl's priority philosophy as the reason for the purpose of restoration, he still shows his dependence on stability and a desire for the ultimate polarity. The reasoning logic is originally the natural facts in the conscious structure through the reduction method to obtain the content of the pure itself. But as long as this itself is given to the insightful requirements, the internal nature of the natural facts is still retained, and at this time, it is given the certainty that it is not required. Therefore, Husserl still left his mind at the level of opinion, but it was just given by rationality to generally gives opinions in a universal form. Therefore, Husserl's discovery was futile, and he eventually did not completely get rid of his obsession with certainty, and did not completely step out of Plato's cave. It is indeed a clear opinion of meaning and clearly, and its state of consciousness is not limited to a subject, but the common "general consciousness" between all subjects. This general consciousness is considered clear and clear because of its universality. In terms of restraint ideas, it is not different from opinions. Therefore, Deller pointed out that the priority phenomenology is limited to the scope of the opinion because of the presets of vision, but it only completes the decomposition and replacement of specific opinions with more general opinions. Although Husserl proposed a priority restoration of consciousness, his method was only satisfied with the foundation of finding a solid and reliable basis for ideas, and lacking reflection on the basis and its purpose.

Since Deleuze is a reason to oppose Husserl's vision with the rigidity of meaning, how can we break the rigidity of meaning and how can we reveal the vagueness of the observance? Dellez believes that these issues constitute the core of philosophy, especially the priority philosophy, and his answer to this question is still based on cracks between meaning and experience. The stance of the opinions of the opinion, the meaning provided in a way of failure or even ridiculous, shows the organization and construction of the organization and construction that it has played in the experience. And the uneasiness that was subsequently caught. However, the destruction effect of this ironic comedy is not enough to promote the emergence of new meaning. Therefore, Deleuze resorted to external emergencies in order to trigger the breakdown of ideas and trigger the re -exploration of meaning to meaning. Essence Taking many incidents in history as an example, people have experienced these incidents, such as the Lisbon Earthquake, the French Revolution, etc. However, the reasons for these incidents and its further consequences can not be in the existing knowledge. It is also for the cracks of suture experience and significance. Thoughts must produce new concepts to determine the incident and produce new expressions to describe. In this way, the thinking breaks brought by the event can be fully used to start a new start from the event. New ideas burst from the Lisbon earthquake, including criticism of natural evil (Voltaire), criticism of civilization (Rousseau), or exploration of natural laws (Kant), and even promoted the development of the European Enlightenment Movement. These are both caused by the great earthquake and outside the earthquake. In other words, the incident has been lingering in the thoughts that are blooming, and from subtleties into the way of thinking, but it does not determine the direction of thought, because in the inside, these events themselves are used as infinite stimuli itself. The next self -overdoing. In the two levels of priority and generating, the direction of meaning is different. At the first level, the meaning is in terms of thought and expression, shaping and supporting the possibility of thought and expression, and ensuring the effectiveness of our current communication. At the second level, the meaning has considerable independence and is independent of the specific situation formed. On the surface, these two different directions lead to contradiction between the concept of meaning. However, by further clarifying the logical level occupied by different degrees of different degrees, Dellerz shows the internal complex movement. As mentioned earlier, the meaning of the first level is based on the basis of observation as its own basis, but the clear thoughts expressed by the observation are only a degree of difference, and there is no absoluteness. If we ask the so -called observation concepts, check the internal structural relationship and external derivation of the concept formation, we will find that the concept of single concept is the composite of many elements internally, but the independent concept is outside And other thoughts in a state of adhesion. Then, the first level of significance for the support of the truth and the guarantee of communication, but because the subject has not fully reflected this effectiveness, otherwise the significance itself is dual questioning from the inside and outside. The root cause of doubt comes from the significance at the second level.

As a priority field of consciousness, it determines the logical possibility of self -explanation when consciousness is existed. The meaning itself is created from the void of meaning, and is created in a "out of nothing", so is consciousness began to be unconscious because of this? Facing meaningless incidents, the significance is the problems raised by consciousness, because once the problem is constructed, the problem itself has already described the possibility of the possibility of the possibility from an angle. "Therefore, the significance is expressed as a problem corresponding to the proposition, because the latter shows a specific reaction, symbolizes the model of general solutions, and shows subjective actions in the solution." Then, meaninglessness constitutes the background of the question as a break from the event, and the meaning is to determine the logic of some kind of thinking in the way of questioning. When raising a question and explaining this issue, consciousness is forgotten and unconscious for its limited nature. It is precisely because of this forgotten that consciousness can make decisions. Under all the sense of consciousness, the maintenance of consciousness goals and achievements need to be unconscious. The skepticism brought about by conscious self -reflection will form the concept and expression of the tearing karma, so that the subject will lose the ability to form order and fall into the chaos of thinking. Unconsciously, as the right of human beings, not only prevent the efforts of the thinkers falling into the accidental desert, but also use the ability to lay the foundation and provide action to provide action with the help of habits. Compared to the natural origin of Husserl's emphasis on consciousness in the priority, Deleuze focuses on dynamic replacement of meaning, consciousness, and unconsciousness in the field of priority. Needpressing is the priority reserve of meaning, and the meaning is meaningless local experience; consciousness is based on unconsciousness, and unconsciousness reveals itself through the limits of consciousness.

The boundaries of the unconscious thoughts, any observation of it can only be due to the assumptions of theoretical ideas. Husserl’s priority theory uses unconsciousness to be unconsciously absorbed into ideas with the absolute nature of consciousness, or for Husserl, just as the object that cannot be discussed outside the thought is also unable to express the empty unconsciousness beyond consciousness. Essence Therefore, Husserl, the subject and world revealed by the priority, includes all the inner roots of the existence. This includes not the storage and summary of the possibility of priority. The possibility of priority is always present, which pre -eliminates the possibility of consciousness disconnection and experience escape significance. As a comparison, Dellez wants to show the limitedness of consciousness through the theory of priority. This limitedness is not only reflected in the unprecedented field of surrounding consciousness, but also in reality. It refers to the rigidity caused by maintaining this limited, maintaining it and stable. The source of the source of thoughts led by the priority is to break the determination and stability of the thought, and the root cause of the consciousness is still out of unconscious spontaneous production. However, if from the perspective of Husserl, once the consciousness is questioned, then the questioning is the question of the subject of consciousness, and then it will cause how to determine the object of consciousness, how to realize the self, the self, and the self to the world to the world. Beyond waiting. In the end, philosophy will find nothing because of the lack of universal foundation. While Deller's ancestral theory, while pursuing the eternal movement of thought, must give up the certainty of thought and the presence of the main body. However, this kind of giving up the birth of the new subject: in the moment when the mind is creative in the uncle, meaningless abyss, the internal vitality of the subject as the subject itself can be instantaneous expression and practice, and it can really get rid of the thoughts. Merid and inertia. Although Husserl and Deller thought their priority theory was priority, the two of them had a fundamental difference. Based on Kant's tradition, Husserl is committed to pursuing the order and rationality of understanding and life. Therefore, priority constitutes the condition of experience and also constitutes the base of experience. Deller was accepted by structuralism to find the possibility of breaking through the experience structure. Therefore, his empiricalism is a criticism and challenge for priority. Just as Dellez summarizes structuralism in this way: "Résultat), Effet: not only a product effect, but also a visual effect and language effect. To a large extent There is a meaning of meaning on the above, and the meaning itself comes from this wrong. "Correspondingly, consciousness and unconsciousness are also on the flow and precipitation between visible surface layers and invisible underlying layers. Deller's priority empiricalism gives him the fulcrum of the plane of experience structure, but this overcoming self -criticism that is essentially depends on rational self -criticism. Experience is the update of meaning and concept to provide fresh air from the outside, thereby maintaining the infinite nature of ideas, but at the same time, it also gives up the integrity of ideas.

The abandonment of philosophy for the overall structure of ideology has long been predicted in the process of replacing the absolute subject of infinite subjects, and confirmed that it is in the theoretical orientation of constructing construct resistance. The destination to reach the process of Hussels through the process of retaining is the original structure of consciousness and the starting point of the meaning of ideological structure, so that the research of phenomenology can become a solid foundation for scientific and rational. The method of the priority restoration proposed by Husserl, in the process of constantly approaching the concept of the priority, everything can be questioned. Except for the priority restore method itself, that is, the belief in the connection of experience causality has never been questioned itself. Essence Dellez has to use the incidental belief of Husserl's causal beliefs that generate internal adhesions: Since the reason cannot be determined, then all the appearances have become a kind of multi -aggregating effect, which is an expression of continuous accumulation of strength, and but also the expression of continuous accumulation of strength. The process of this generation cannot be decomposed or restored. In other words, any restore attempts will be re -constructed for experience at the same time, and it is another generation. Under the initiative, any meaning or truth is inevitable to have historicity, but the occurrence of this history is full of accidents that cannot be penetrated by rationality. However, this did not make the current loss of historic significance. Instead, after getting rid of the cause and effect, it opened up to the maximum possible openness and to the greatest extent to clear the boundaries of restricting practice creation.

Third, unconscious: separation of subjectivity and priority

How to examine unawareness through philosophical methods and give it appropriate resettlement methods, which is reflected in Husserl's consciousness theory and the common issue in the philosophy of Deleuze. From the way they resett, they can observe their own ways of understanding the subject, especially the paradox of subjectivity. Husserl once proposed: "Human subjective paradox: It is the subject of the world, and at the same time it is the object of the world." In order to keep the text consistent, the translation of "subject" and "object" was adopted. Husserl tried to maintain the absoluteness of the subject with a complete structure of consciousness, while Deller was pulled back to the object of the object like unconscious spontaneity, and their experienced interpretation of unconsciousness was rooted in the root cause of the unconscious interpretation. Its different attitudes to the priority field. Husserl's priority restoration still requires the inner transcendence concept of the subject, including the category of meaning, but Dellez wants to cancel the transcendence of the precedent field, and place the source of meaning generation and conceptual production in the unconscious flow. middle. By designating the boundary of the philosophy for unconscious, Husserl wants to maintain the main body of the priority, but Deller wants to show the priority of no subject -the strength of pure ideas, even to suppress the violence of life; The subjectivity of the life is based on the surging resistance of life and eliminates the constraints of all conceptual forms. Although Deller is trying to get rid of Husserl's influence, it must be acknowledged that in the study of consciousness created by Husserl, the inherent tension of priority and subjectivity began to show up. The conscious analysis established by Husserl has become a turning point in the development of European philosophy. Although French philosophy, in the process of absorbing consciousness theory, the interpretation and interpretation of it far exceeds the latter's attention to the structure within pure consciousness. Levinas still feels that its conscious theory still has an endless vitality from the time structure of Husserl. It is necessary to discover the importance of the "living present" given by the original manuscript, because the proposal of "living now" is proposed. It is to re -open the experience of pure and spontaneous at the beginning of the beginning of the intention. However, as Levinas discovered, Husserl was anxious to "stay" because he was too concerned about the occurrence of objectivity. And the orderly interpretation of the "front photography", which closed the origin of the "living present". The path of "from intention to feeling activity" proposed by Levinas is to return to perceptual paths in order to return to non -intentional "living present".

In France's phenomenology research, although Levinas first went to Sartre, the absorption and acceptance of Husserl's theory was directly benefited from Sartre, or it was in the Sartre Institute. Above the thinking fulcrum, the latecomers started their respective doubts and criticisms of the subject of consciousness. As early as 1937, Sartre published "self -transcendence". While summarizing the main points of Husserl's priority phenomenon, he pointed out its limitations on the definition of consciousness, especially for thinking about the priority method itself itself. insufficient. The method of priority restoration is essentially a reflection on self and world. Reflection not only produces the internal folding of the self, but also brings "self -transcendence". Sartre borrowed Lanbo's famous saying: "I (Je) is an other person", which means the break between the "me" and the "self" of Binge in the self -reflection. I reflective me, the "settings" (Position "(Position) has been separated and completely different from the experience of experience, but to examine the experience like others, and through the virtuality of existence The unity of various consciousness flows into self, constructing itself as a limited existence of a certain "for it". The "I" of the main grid pulled away the possibility of surpassing this limited existence. In Sat's main theory, it also revealed the division between the subject of the experience bearer and the division of the subject of the empirical builder. Between the balanced experience and structure, that is, between the existence and transcendence, Sat is more inclined to highlight the existing first role: "The existence of precedent for nothingness and laid the foundation for nothingness ... and because of existence, nothingness has exactly played specifically. Function. "Vainlessness is the grasp of existence. Sartre has not used the" overwhelming "or" understanding "commonly used in phenomenology. Instead, it creates the concept of" néant ". For the assumptions: consciousness is not transcendence in existence, but the existence of the existence is one -sided in the process of deficiency, so that the self is temporarily uniform and certain. Of course, Sartre has not given no conscious status at the level of existence or at the level of consciousness.

In the interpretation of consciousness and existing philosophy, Sat's method represents the overall position of French philosophy before and after World War II. Merlot Ponty, the same period as Sartre, also proposed in the "Structure of Behavior" (1942). In the level, we can all find the unified function that consciousness assumes: "It (consciousness -author note) is preset as a place where ideas are available, and we are associated with the integration of survival everywhere." Like Sat, Merlot Ponty also has the connotation of extended consciousness to ensure the integrity and unity of life. In addition to Sartre and Mero-Pontel, philosophers such as Paul Lico and Jean Epolite tend to deny unconsciousness as the opposite of consciousness, but at the same time indirectly revealed doubts about the absolute consciousness. They Starting from different aspects, establish an external connection of conscious activities, and place consciousness in an open relationship. In this new conscious structure, consciousness is still absolutely absolute, but it is no longer all. The explanation of consciousness has begun to highlight the passiveness of the subject and the existence. Correspondingly, the source of the concept of priority has also begun to sway the fuzzy zone between experience and abstraction. The way to restore, the method of reflection is still retained. However, the experience is increasingly clearly showing the resistance to "restore": every heavy reflection has become a new fold attached to experience. The deficiency of the subject and the degradation of the priority eventually led to the no longer the unable to complete the overall understanding and construction of the existence, and only one -sided and temporary understanding can be formed. But this is exactly the warning put forward by Husserl in the "crisis of European science": "The rational belief of the" absolute "of the meaning of the world, the belief of the meaning of history, the meaning of human nature, the meaning of human nature Belief, that is, the beliefs that have the ability to generate reasonable significance to the generation of others and the survival of ordinary people have collapsed. "But beyond Husserl's expected, this crisis is not from outside Caused by natural sciences, it occurred from the internal philosophy and revealed the internal crisis of consciousness through the re -explanation of the mechanism of consciousness. Husserl will unconsciously storage within consciousness, and regards the edge state of consciousness, which fundamentally excludes unconscious threats. Although Sartre and others have denied unconscious rationality, in the expansion of their consciousness, the interaction of consciousness and other activities shows the limitedness of consciousness. This kind of interconnection is further developed into a continuous structure of consciousness and unconsciousness in the philosophy of Deleuz, or the interconnection of consciousness and unconsciousness, so as to re -take the unconscious recovery as the task of inspection of philosophy, and transform the crisis into philosophy update Opportunity. How to perform philosophical analysis on the premise of admitting unconscious -this question has not been answered. The debate between Derida and Foucault showed differences in this issue. Based on the contradiction of the unconscious herself, Derrica's interpretation of Cartes Descartes in "Crazy and irrational", especially the theoretical purpose set in this -let the mad talk -raised question. Drida believes that the madness and rational opposition set by Foucault leads to the madness through rational writing crazy, drowning the madness deeper, and leading to an unconscious explanation inevitably a paradox. More than ten years later, Foucault refuted to Derrida in "My Body, this paper, this fire". Crazy and rational are not positive opposition. Madness is hidden under rational. crazy. If the unconscious interpretation itself contains paradoxes, then Foucault pointed out that the so -called sober subject, in order to maintain its qualifications as a thinker, eliminate and avoid potential danger in advance, as Cartesian eliminated Crazy, but in the end he couldn't get rid of the disturbance of dreams. In other words, dreams make the thoughts unable to designate the boundaries of soberness and sleep, and the qualifications of the thinker are therefore facing the danger of unbearable self -proven. From this perspective, Foucault fills the core of cognition with faith, revealing its unconsciousness of its own limited and vagueness in the rational monologue. Then, unconscious writing appears on the edge of conscious self -evidence, exposing its inner passion and paranoia through rational cracks.

Although the unconscious interpretation will inevitably introduce ideas into adventure, French philosophy has never given up this theoretical mission, and their unconscious philosophy may be summarized from Levinas' comments on "trauma": "This is unconsciously unconsciously The significance: It is the late night that self -persecution is returned to itself -more passive than any passiveness under identity, responsibility, and replacement. "It is because it is full of passiveness and philosophy in unconsciousness, philosophy, philosophy Only to work hard to approach unconsciousness, reveal that the subject can neither control nor gets rid of the passiveness, but also fundamentally realize the self -reflection of human nature. Foucault, Deleuz, and their generations and French philosophers have generally inherited the idea of ​​conscious critical criteria for unconscious interpretation. If we want to summarize the way of the unstelyfly concept of French philosophy from France after World War II, we can be divided into three progressive levels according to the theoretical relationship between unconscious and consciousness: (1) accepting the concept of unconsciousness, but this does not affect the stability in the field of consciousness. The production of production will not deny the absoluteness of the subject; (2) acknowledge the concept and phenomenon of unconsciousness, and allows unconsciousness to destroy stability and subjectivity, but also allows stability and reconstruction of subjectivity; (3) With unconscious chaos and annihilation in the field of order, local stability and temporary subjectivity are no longer possible, and therefore terminate the possibility of constructing the world. During the Deller period, Forda, Drida, Lacan, Liva, Levinas, etc., generally manifested in the balance between consciousness and unconsciousness in historical structure, text interpretation, and real criticism. The new generation of French philosophy shows relatively obvious differentiation: Marion, Badio, and A -Gump are accustomed to returning to traditional texts and discover the potential of theoretical interpretation in re -reading. Fundamentally, it is Descartes that the tradition of priority subject theory that defines the subject of pure consciousness in contemplation. Contemporary French philosophy has rethinking consciousness through Husserl to surpass Descartes' subjective theory. A new generation of scholars such as Zizerk and Meyasu are better at combining the current art creation and cutting -edge science and technology. Resonance occurred in the direction of these two. Badio and others often chose to return the classic issue from the edge text of the history of philosophy, just like the interpretation of the theory of the quiet view of Provetano and Hume to Shake the core framework of the history of philosophy, introduce turbulence in stability, and then intervene in the construction of the current reality. Unconscious voids are equivalent to infinite possibilities, so from Husserl to Deller, unconscious theoretical positions have repeatedly moved, and reflecting their dialogue with psychology. Husserl warned the deception brought by psychological logicism, and Deller criticized psychological analysis of the rigidity and flatization of unconsciousness -these are all revealed in their arguments on passive synthesis and priority consciousness. Dellez is constantly approaching the subjectivity of the unprecedentedness and the priority of the non -subject, thereby unloading the restrictions of the priority conditions for experience. It is precisely at this point that Deller did not surpass Husserl's theoretical framework, but only after consuming the priority structure of Husserl, it was filled with the vacancy left by new possibilities. Priority is retained, and the subjectivity is also retained. However, the two have abandoned the stability, and the replacement is temporary. While ensuring the freedom of experience, it can analyze and interpret it. From this perspective, Husserl and Derler represent different positions and methods of European philosophy. The unconscious boundary they constructed is based on the crisis or timing perceived in the theory of unconsiside theory of psychology, and they are in The their own theoretical traditions receive their ideological mission. As the successor of Kant's philosophy, Husserl, who is seeking absolute certainty, has not been realized through the mission of strict science through phenomenology, and its unilateral philosophical boundary setting has not been completed, but he described it by describing The structure of consciousness, clarifying the motivation of consciousness, and the establishment of philosophical restrictions for unconsciousness, also opened new ideas about priority and subject. Although Dellez has undergone the influence of Husserl's conscious research on unconscious theoretical investigations, in the process of putting forward the unconscious thinking methods and theoretical boundaries from the perspective of philosophy, he revealed that Bergsonism, France, France, The profound influence of Nononeism. In the most surface layer of ideological development, the turning performance of the two ways between the two is the transformation of setting the boundary method: the boundary limit of the philosophy set up for unconsciousness is still there, but it is no longer defensive and exclusive. It is obviously a landmark that can be passed. The existence outside the border is not sure or predicts, and it is precisely because it should become a new field of philosophical thought.

- END -