The United University should be a chance of unity, not fighting against the battlefield

The general debate of the 77th UN General Assembly is underway. This is the first face -to -face conference organized by the United Nations Headquarters since the outbreak of the new crown epidemic. This year's United University was held in the context of the "severe division" of the world. It should also be an opportunity to strengthen communication, bridge differences, and deal with global challenges to prevent some countries from turning the United University into manufacturing division and further intensify contradictions. And the tools of confrontation.

UN Secretary -General Gutres warned in the opening white that it was restrained by geopolitical tensions around a series of challenges. "The world is in a dangerous situation and paralyzed. There is no cooperation, no dialogue, no collective solution to the problem. But the reality is that we live in a world that cooperates and dialogues is the only logical way." Getres' warning is not only a description of the current situation, but also a concern for the current situation of the United Nations. However, to the extent to which a warning can be transformed into the actual actions of some key countries, a large question mark needs to be made.

Many media reports mentioned that the general debate of the United University this week was dominated by the US and its allies and Russia around the Ukrainian issue. The United States and its allies are committed to launching a "isolated Russia" campaign. In addition to continuing to strongly condemn Russia, they are also giving gangs to neutral countries. The Russian side is allegedly discussed that "the United States and the West will launch a mixed war in Ukraine." Many developing countries and assistance organizations are worried that diplomatic conflicts around Ukraine issues will destroy a key opportunity to resolve other problems such as famine and climate crisis.

In the world situation of chaos, the United Nations is also undergoing "a test of profound differences." Is it allowed to abduct some forces and become a tool to promote group politics and so -called "values" for specific countries? Or continue to adhere to the democratization of international relations, adhere to the comprehensive development and security concepts, and solve the problems facing the country facing together through the real multilateralism? From the perspective of the development history of the United Nations, these two forces have been repeatedly pulled. Based on the future unity and cooperation force of human beings to defeat the split confrontation for geopolitical logic, it affects the play of the United Nations, and it also affects the future of hundreds of millions of people around the world. Essence

One thing is unreasonable. Although the general debate of the United University is currently occupied by a large number of contradictions and disagreements, the United Nations is still the core of the current global governance. It is in a key position in response to a series of challenges. The core of the system. Because of this, the international community generally has high hopes for the United Nations system and uses it as a priority platform for the pursuit of a beautiful vision of the world. In this case, how the United Nations consolidates consensus and promote unity requires courage, wisdom, and new ideas.

In this process, whether the big country chooses dialogue, cooperation, or chose division and confrontation, it is of great significance. It is also the lessons of World War I and World War II. The principle of "big country" has become the most important operating rules for the United Nations mechanism. Especially when the current Russian and Ukraine issues are facing upgrading and humanitarian disasters are imminent, great powers should especially actively safeguard the authority of the United Nations. Through the United Nations platform, a "emergency channel" is left for the solution of the dispute to the dispute by the United Nations platform, instead of the United Nations instrumentalization and consciousness Morphological, abduction of the United Nations for political interests of land use, making the already complex problems more difficult to solve. This is morality and responsibility.

In the existing speeches, representatives of many countries talked about the word "unity". Everyone saw it, but there were differences in solving the path. At this moment, we need to practice true multilateralism and jointly maintain the principles of the UN Charter. We suggest representatives of the participating countries to carefully read the "China to attend the 77th UN General Assembly Document". It gives the current turbulent change period and gives a "Chinese plan". Program.

At this United University, behind the developing countries, behind the development of the famine and climate crisis, and preventing the monopoly of the Russian and Ukraine's monopoly, it reflects the hope of pursuing a comprehensive and common concept of security, rather than a single led by a certain forces. Safety concept. We believe that the standard for measuring the valuable opening of the United University should be that after the end of the United Nations, the cracks of this world are big or small, or if they have more cooperation or less. You can also have a responsibility to determine it.

This article is the Society of Global Times.

- END -