100,000 netizens participated in the "Tuesday Tuesday" question, and the judge reminded: This question is suspected of illegal

The Yangtze River Daily Da Wuhan client September 21st. The hundred judges settled in the Great Wuhan client. After the "Tuesday's Tuesday" column was upgraded every day, netizens asked enthusiastically. Among them, some people use text to tell their cases in detail. Some people send relevant pictures to proof. Some people upload screenshots of the party's WeChat dialogue, and some people posted the surveillance video of the "scene of the crime" ...

As of 1 noon on September 21, a total of 118 questions were received in the column, and more than 100,000 netizens participated in the interaction. At present, Li Chong, a rotating judge and deputy director of the Executive Bureau of the People's Judge of Hanyang District, responded one by one.

27 execution problems have been answered 18

In the past two days, netizens have raised hundreds of legal issues, including 27 of them involved rotating judges. As of press time, the judge has answered 18.

Netizens who were called "013" asked by the mobile phone that he had a private lending case. The lawsuit won. During the execution, the other party had no house and no car, and was included in the blacklist of the dishonest. In the past two years, the other party hasn't paid a penny, but now he found that the other party's health shops and clothing stores have been opened. Want to ask how to defend their rights?

Li Chong replied that if you have evidence to prove that the executed person has income, you can apply for the executive court to perform the income of the person's execution.

Netizens with a mobile phone number "359" asked that he took a house on Yangluo Street, Xinzhou District on Taobao. The house is a contract filing house. It is purchased but not transferred, and is still under the name of the developer. Developers have two seals due to debt, troublesome transfer procedures, and have not succeeded in transferred for 3 months. Can the developer's debtors apply to seize the house?

Li Chong replied that according to the law, if the court has sent the transfer registration to the registration authority to assist the notice of the household registration, if there will be a seizure of the house involved in the registration authority, the registration authority shall give priority to the registration authority. Application registration.

Netizen "Song Jibin" said that he had an execution case and did not implement it for three years, and became a "final case." He wanted to ask, if he could not provide the property information of the person's executed person, would he never be executed? Now he can no longer find the elimination information of the executed person on the execution of the information disclosure. Is it deleted? Can I relieve the disappearance of the dishonest without execution?

Li Chong told him that on the one hand, you can collect the clue of the property clue to the court to resume the implementation on the one hand, and on the other hand, the court will perform the execution of the person who is executed. Regarding whether the executed person is restricted to high consumption and included in the list of dishonest personnel, you can go directly to the executive court for case inquiry.

Netizens asked questions about illegal illegal

According to statistics, in 118 questions from netizens, questions from netizens are mainly concentrated on real estate, borrowing, salary, and contracts; the questions are rich in forms, covering text, pictures, and videos.

Because legal issues are very professional and involve the direction of specific cases, it is difficult for judges to answer related questions across professionalism.

Judge Li Chong reminded netizens that when asking questions, it is best not to mention the specific names, the company's name, and the crimes they think, and do not send each other's videos and photos at will. Before the lawsuit is not concluded, the other party is suspected of violations in advance. It is easy to be countered by the other party.

The lawsuit in the trial is best not to ask questions. Every case depends on the specific situation. The judge of the trial must know the case better than other judges who only listened to the unilateral opinion.

(Changjiang Daily reporter Chen Yong correspondent Chen Yali Zhuangkai)

【Edit: Wang Rongfei】

For more exciting content, please download the "Da Wuhan" client in the major application markets.

- END -