"One step forward" 18 years of walls into the "Heart Wall" 18 residents can renew the "good fate" again

The No. 5 Courtyard No. 5 of Yongshun Town, Tongzhou District, Beijing, is divided into the first phase of Tianci Liangyuan and the Western Third Phase III of Tianci Liangyuan, which is separated by a fence. Today, the two parks residents stood on the opposite side because of the wall, and one side asked for demolition, and one party resolutely guarded. Why did the wall that had been 18 years suddenly became the focus of controversy? What are the demands and how to satisfy the back of the wall?

This Sunday (September 18), the first national livelihood program "Ahead", which was broadcast on the first citizen of Beijing Satellite TV, came to Tianci Liangyuan Community, Xifuheyuan No. 5 Courtyard to invite residents' representatives. Grass -roots cadres, relevant departments, and experts in various fields jointly solve the dilemma of the "demolition of the wall" and explore the innovation of the pain points of the old district with "small surgery".

Each reason: Should the 18 -year wall be dismantled?

The first phase of the Liangliang Garden and the Western Phase III residents expressed their opinions at the first stage. The third -phase residents of the Western Phase III believed that the wall was illegal and took out the building and planning diagrams to prove it. There is a fence in the community convention approved by the bureau, and the wall is legal. Which party's evidence is more convincing, which nature is the wall? What are the reasons and purposes of the Western third phase of residents who want to remove the wall?

Focus on disputes: Is there a community in the first and Western phases?

The fence problem has not been resolved, and the relationship between the two parks in the first phase and the Western Phase III has once again triggered fierce debate. The residents of the Western Phase III believe that the two parks are in a large courtyard with an address, connected to the building, and belong to the same community. The first phase of the residents emphasized that the first phase of the first phase of the convention, the four to the area, and the area of ​​the park are independent communities. A first phase of residents explicitly stated that the third phase of Western residents came to the first phase, we welcome, but the two sides are neighbors, not relatives. Why did the third -stage residents of the Western Phase first obsessed with the wall after disassembling the wall? Who can give an authoritative conclusion in the relationship between the two parks?

Adhere to your own opinions: Will "New Bud" grow or wither?

In the voices of the debate, the residents of the Western third phase of the Western Phase III said their own distress. The area of ​​the park was small, the terrain was narrow, and the supporting facilities were small. The pain points of the old community surfaced, and the problems of community governance were in front of them. Local town leaders expressed their reasonable demands for supporting the residents of the Western Third Phase III, and the responsible planner put forward solutions on the spot to implement the "new bud project" by micro -update. I did not expect to be strongly opposed by the residents again. What are the reasons for this time? Can the livable demand of residents in the Western third phase of the Western third phase be realized?

The reason for the two -phase residents of Liangliang Garden is a yearning for a better life. Whether the local government can transform and improve quality tests the wisdom of grassroots governance. The dispute between the fence needs to be calmed down, and the "heart wall" crux needs to be eliminated. Can the residents of the two sides move forward together and let the "Tianci good fate" last for a long time? Can the local grass -roots government make a group force to make this people's livelihood project into a popular project? For more content, please lock in this Sunday (September 18) at 21:05 Beijing Satellite TV "Ahead"!

- END -