At the age of 52, I waste educational resources at college?Don't question individual netizens as the mainstream ｜ Yangtze River comment

In the opening season of this year, the 52 -year -old Hubei Light Industry Vocational College of Light Industry and Technology, Lu Xinlin, has attracted social attention. Lu Xinlin, who has a college degree, retired in advance due to physical reasons and participated in this year's college entrance examination and was admitted. In the sound of praise, some netizens questioned that Lu Xinlin "occupied educational resources".

As stated that in the Internet era, an accident may cause "public opinion boiling" on the Internet, and a netizen comments may also cause "public opinion carnival". The voice on the Internet cannot be ignored, and it is necessary to distinguish between the right and wrong, but to distinguish the mainstream and tributaries, some netizens question may not be the mainstream.

The inquiries found that the media first reported that Lu Xinlin's information on the university. As of September 17, netizens liked nearly 90,000 times, and more than 2,800 messages were left. "How courageous to go to college at this age" "Live to the old, learn to be old", "It's not easy" "I think it's so good" "Everyone has a dream." The majority of the majority is the mainstream.

Among these comments, there are only a few "occupying educational resources", "waste of national resources", and "waste public resources". It can be said that questioning netizens are just individuals, and questioning has not been recognized by everyone. On the contrary, a number of netizens do not think it is a waste of resources. For example, "this uncle is tested in the exam, how can you waste resources?" Wait.

From the perspective of policy, the state has canceled the age limit of the college entrance examination from the system many years ago. As long as you meet the registration conditions and participate in the college entrance examination and meet the admission criteria, you will be admitted without occupying or wasting educational resources.

On the Internet, the questioning of individual netizens or a small number of netizens as a topic is not a case. This summer, Xie Yongan, a 67 -year -old "conscience grandfather", sold only two dollars and one cup because of the drink. After drinking, he can renew the cup for free to board the hot search. Netizens across the country like him. Some netizens questioned that his drink was not clean, and some netizens said that he was so old that he was so filial. Some media followed the rhythm of the media to say that the uncle was "cyber violence", and this became hot search, and a large number of netizens condemned the behavior of cyber storms. What about the actual situation? Some media reports said: "Most of the comments on the Internet are good, only a small number of people 'nonsense'."

In the network space, ignoring most of the netizens' voices, the topic of hype online topics by amplifying the doubts of individual netizens or a small number of netizens, the reason is probably to collect traffic. This is not conducive to cultivating positive and healthy, upward network culture, nor is it conducive to creating a clear network space. Content producers, communicationers, and Internet communication platform providers should distinguish the mainstream and tributaries, identify the essence and phenomenon, and do not blindly rely on the questioning of individual netizens or a small number of netizens to create topics and harvest traffic.

【Edit: Wang Yujin】

- END -