Extraordinary comment | Walking dog men forced the inbagers to apologize to the dog, it's really bullying too much

Xu Hanxiong, a polar news commentator

"Ping An Beijing Chaoyang" WeChat public account on September 16 news, in response to the situation of a dog -walking dog forced takeaway apology, Beijing Chaoyang police have seized Liu Moumou (male, 30 years old), Liu Moumou Expressing his own behavior, apologizing to the takeaway in person and obtaining understanding. At present, Liu Moumou has been punished by the police in accordance with the law. (According to the interface news on September 16)

Relevant situation report (Source: Ping An Chaoyang)

According to media reports, on September 14, in a community in Beijing, a takeaway worker hurriedly delivered meals, and hurriedly didn't pay attention. He hit a puppy without a rope. The dog owner immediately accused him of apologizing to the dog Intersection Because he was in a hurry, he was afraid of delaying time. The takeaway brother quickly explained that he was not intentional. He also said sorry, and apologized for the puppy who was hit. Unexpectedly, the dog owner was still unwilling, and his attitude was tough and did not let the takeaway go.

Related video screenshots (Source: Interface News)

The scene in the video made netizens feel fire, thinking that the dog walking man was too much and seemed overbearing. The police notified that it was praised by netizens, and believed that the "evil is bad" made people feel healed and maintained fairness and justice.

Netizens are not clear about this, and show that the behavior of the dog walking man is unpopular. Similar "human dogs" contradictions occur from time to time, and the dog owner's overbearing overbearing has repeatedly caused public anger, that is, the dog owner only protects the interests of the dog one side, but ignores the rights of people and overlook the interests of the dog. The empathy and empathy of people, so they are unpopular.

Last year, a woman in Bengbu, Anhui had a speech and physical conflict with others while walking the dog in the community, saying that she had opened a few restaurants and lost tens of millions. She also threatened: "My dog ​​is valuable than people. If you dare to get my dog, I will kill your child." The result caused a stir, because the woman was too arrogant and arrogant. The interests are in the eyes, although they are talking about qi, they also blatantly despise the lives of others, and they are arrogant. Afterwards, the Bengbu police violated the woman's human safety against the woman's human safety in accordance with the law, and punished the seven days of administrative detention. The woman's husband also apologized for this to calm the incident.

The dog raising people have feelings for dogs. This is understandable. The dog's animal welfare should be guaranteed. The dog cannot be hurt for no reason. This is also no doubt. However, raising dogs must also abide by relevant regulations to protect the interests of people from infringing. For example, walking dogs should hold ropes, wear collars, and carry items and appliances that remove dog manure with you to effectively stop dogs and other behaviors. Raising dogs in accordance with regulations is to avoid disturbing the people, avoid dogs harmed people, and protect the interests of people.

People cannot hurt dogs, and dog owners must not let go, drive dogs to intimidate or hurt others. This is not only a moral issue, but also a legal issue. The "Civil Code" stipulates that if the breeding of animals cause damage to others, if the animal feeder or manager shall be damaged by no persons to cause safety measures to cause other people, the animal breeder or manager shall bear the liability for infringement. Therefore, walking dogs without ropes, and no safety measures for animals must bear legal consequences. Only by achieving civilized dogs and properly handling the contradiction between "human dogs" can we avoid some disputes.

Some people say that the essence of human and dog contradictions and the nature of dogs are contradictions between people. If raising dogs does not comply with regulations, walking dogs without ropes, dogs offend people, or people accidentally offend the dogs. As a result of the contradiction between "people".

The dog owner maintains the interests of the dog, and at the same time, we must respect the interests of people. If you walk the dog without holding the rope and do not reflect on your own problems, when a person's contradiction occurs, the attitude is arrogant and bullied. Appendent apology for the dog is to bully people too much and trample on the dignity of people must cause public anger.

Since raising dogs is a movement of love, treating small animals is good and caring, and it should be more respectful to people's lives.

- END -