The children's publications were used to incite the hate of Hong Kong police and new immigrants, and five were guilty!

For the former "Hong Kong Word Therapist Federation of Trade Unions", five members of the "Yangcun" picture book were released, suspected of publishing, publishing, distributing, displaying or replicating the crime of inciting publications. All the defendants were ruled after interrogation.

The Hong Kong Police Guoan Office showed the children's picture book in the case of the case at a press conference. Source: Wenhui.com

The five defendants include Li Wenling, the chairman of the "Hong Kong Speech Therapist", Yang Yiyi, vice chairman, Wu Qiaoyi, Secretary Wu Qiaoyi, Zu Chen Yuansen, and members Fang Zihao. From 2020 to 2021, the organization published three children's picture books with the theme of "Yangcun", namely "Yangcun Guardian", "Yangcun Twelve Warriors" and "Yangcun Chiang Daofu". "Repair storms" and "12 Hong Kong people cases" and "Hong Kong Medical Strikes" in February 2020. In July 2021, the Police National Security Department took action after conducting investigations and arrested five members of the organization; in October of the same year, the organization was revoked and registered in accordance with the "Regulations on the Employees". According to the Hong Kong "Sing Tao Daily" reported on the 8th, the two parties proposed several disputes during the interrogation on the 7th, including whether the three picture books involved in the case were published. Guo Weijian, a judge of the Guoan Law, said affirmatively that the picture book involved in the case is an incitement publication. The publisher of the picture book obviously refused to accept the constitutional order of Hong Kong after the return of Hong Kong, guiding readers to hate the special, the police, the dissatisfaction with the new immigrants, and deepen the hostility and hatred between residents. Readers believe that the only way of response is to "resist", so the three picture books have incitement diagrams, and this is not only derived from text, but also includes the effects of these texts in children's mind. After the case was detained until Saturday, all the defendants continued to pay off.

As for the defense claims that the picture book has an open problem, it is not to instill any ideas. Judge Guo's direct approval of this statement is hypocritical, because it can be clearly seen from the context and narrative method of the picture book. Children's thinking is guided by a specific way. The "open answer" is just a "guidance answer". The danger of such answers is that children may mistakenly think that their ideas originated from themselves, and they cannot notice that they are actually instilled, which may make it difficult for future thinking models to change. The judge also said that Hong Kong's political and social conditions need to be understood at the time of the incident. Many people have participated in violence. Although the society has been calm since the implementation of the National Security Law, these rioters have only entered the ground. At present, the political situation is "calm. However, the inside is still turbulent. "In order to ensure national security and maintain public order, it is necessary to restrict restrictions.

Senior barrister and executive committee member Tang Jiazhen said that provoking hatred may also affect public safety. Because of the release of institutional picture books, it may affect weathering morality, and children are not allowed by children to poison children through picture books. Some Hong Kong media commented on the 8th that those who participated in the riots in the picture book were beautified as "sheep", and Hong Kong was "Yangcun". The so -called "twelve warriors" refers to fugitives who have tried to cross Taiwan, and many of them involved serious crimes. The child is ignorant and ignorance. The defendant abuses his profession and uses the form of picture books to "brainwash" the child to instill the "hatred" consciousness and incite separationism and the awareness of the rebellion. This is absolutely sinister. The article said that after the "repair storm" calmed down, the Hong Kong police repeatedly detected the guns and ammunition cases, showing that someone thieves did not die, trying to continue to engage in violence, but more through publications, performance activities, etc. incite "fighting" and "opposition". This "soft confrontation" is more concealed and dangerous. But whether it is "hard confrontation" or "soft confrontation", it is a behavior that destroys Hong Kong's social welfare and must be punished in accordance with the law.

Global Times Special Journalist in Hong Kong Ye Lan

- END -