"Oh! It feels like heart" "Really?"

You and TA are about cooperating with the group in the cafe.

You ordered a cup of coffee.

The process is smooth, and you cooperate well.

When the discussion is over, you get up and prepare to leave.

At this time you feel a little wrong.

The heart of the heart in the chest and drums shake the firecrackers, setting off a silent stormy wave.

You explored the pulse with sweating.

"."

"."

You look around the empty and read a small ticket for the order of the coffee.

It's over. you think.

"I may fall in love with TA"

Everyone will think so.

In addition to the cup of concentrated coffee containing double caffeine on the table.

This story has a more widely circulated version and a more widely circulated term--

Sling effect.

01

Why do we think we are moving?

Psychologists use the two-factor theory of Shaht Singh's emotions to explain the passion or strong sex of one person to another.

The emotional theory of Shaht Singh believes that the emergence of emotions stems from three factors-

surroundings;

The individual itself is different from the previous state or response, such as accelerated heartbeat and sweating palms;

Individual explanations of their own state changes.

Shaht proposed that when a person had obvious physiological reactions but could not find an obvious explanation, he would automatically find a suitable explanation to break this state. In other words, people's interpretations of their own physiological reactions determine the ultimate emotions of people themselves.

And this explanation is not absolutely correct, and it is likely that "error attribution" is likely to give an error explanation to some kind of physiological state.

The suspension bridge effect is the classic error attribution.

Psychologist Stengberg believes that love consists of intimacy, passion and commitment. Once a person attributes his excitement to passion, he will think that such a passion will disrupt his inner "ancient well without waves", which will cause "love".

Let's go back to the beginning of the story--

You mistake the double caffeine's physiological influence on your physical influence as an attraction of the other party in appearance, behavior, etc., and believes that the culprit of your heartbeat, shortness of breath, and sweating of palms are love. In the current social environment, the most prominent object -TA.

02

Is the suspension bridge experiment really successful?

Back to that classic suspension bridge experiment.

There are two bridges across the river.

A suspension bridge swaying with the wind a few hundred feet away from the water, and the bridge deck is only three feet wide. You must hold the railing to ensure your safety; while the wooden bridge is strong and spacious, you don't have to worry The bridge rolls into the water.

When the passers -by who walked through the two bridges was an experimental assistant -a traditional beauty required to write a story, the story written by the people who walk the suspension bridge is more exciting and interesting; It will be more inclined to call the beauty assistant to stay.

Do you think the truth is obvious?

In fact, the so -called "suspension bridge experiment" that the public is familiar with cannot even be called an experiment because it does not guarantee an important prerequisite for the experiment -random grouping. Without random distribution research objects, what you get is only individual differences, that's all.

Please, that is the bridge that may fall into the water when walking!

Is there a possibility that there will be a spacious wooden bridge. Instead, people who take the suspension bridge in danger of life may have written a stimulating interesting story, or decide to call the beauty who meets the first meeting? (Impossible, absolutely impossible)

But when we pulled this experiment into the laboratory.

For some tables participating in the experiments, the questions in the table include "How charm do you think people who do experiments you experimented?"

When some of them obtained the instructions that "electric shock experiments that will be slightly painful will be performed in a while", they admit that the charm of people who perform experiments is greater.

When the main test requires the control group to fill in the form normally, and the experimental team is required to go to the running machine for ten minutes before filling the form, even if it is "running" that will obviously cause heartbeat to accelerate, the experimental team will still accelerate the heartbeat with the master. The charm of the test is combined.

EMM… suspension bridge effect seems to be able to be established. (Shaht ecstatic)

The next step is the carnival of various psychologists.

The most extensive application of Shaht's theory is to relieve anxiety and fear through errors.

If I know the reason why I have such emotions is not me, but because of external factors -such as drugs, then the emotions I feel subjectively will weaken. From this perspective, theoretically people can control their emotions by changing physical conditions.

In a study, psychologists take a pill that claims to have the same physiological reactions as being shocking, but in fact, it is completely useless at all, and the participants have experienced a series of more and more painful but can be used. The electric shock at any time.

They found that when participants attributed their physiological abnormalities to pills instead of electric shocks, they would endure stronger electric shocks than other participants.

Another study found that when inducing participants attributed emotional restlessness to noise, the participants reduced their fear of the upcoming electric shock.

However, the plot that is too smooth is always unrealistic--

In another experiment, psychologists made participants who were afraid of public speeches to speak while listening to white noise. According to the above, participants should throw the pot that is afraid of the public speech to the white noise and relieve their fear. But the end is that the participants will become more afraid when they hear the white noise that makes people emotionally excited. It looks like psychologists are almost fighting (take out the seeds of melon seeds, soda.jpg)

So why is this?

03

there is only one truth!

First of all, Shaht's theory emphasizes error attribution almost under any circumstances. But in most cases, we are too familiar with our emotional response, and it is difficult to be affected by experimental operations.

Therefore, the error attribution only in a new situation.

Therefore, the little story about coffee is too ideal, because the scene of cafes + cooperation is too familiar to us, so it is difficult for us to link our own physiological reactions to the existence of the other party.

The scene of speeches + white noise is also applicable, that is, for those who are highly afraid of public performance, the fear of focusing on eyes and public eyes has been deeply engraved into the DNA, which is familiar with overwhelming. Therefore, the information provided by error is not so effective.

Secondly, the evidence here is not decisive, and there are too many other explanations that can replace Shaht's theory. In other words, there seems to be few or without direct data that the subject actually changed the emotion that they believed to cause a physiological reaction.

In other words, Shaht's theory can effectively predict emotional reactions, but it cannot successfully explain the process of emotional generation, but just a guess of a post -horse cannon.

This is the cleverness of emotions, and it is also deliberate to wipe my shoulders and no longer meet.

I can guess that this is the back door that genes continues self -retained, and I can throw the pot to fate irresponsible.

But in the final analysis, no matter how dark the box is operating, this is just an opportunity. When the answer is spread on the table, you only need to make a choice.

Whether to solve the puzzle, then accept and enjoy the mystery.

A rush.

A Glance.

A touch.

A dance.

You just accidentally broke into my eyes, shining like a star.

(So ​​heartbeat is running out)

(nod)

Top down and decline to view reference:

[1] WALSTER, E (1971). Passionate love. In b. I. MURSTEIN, theories of Attraction and love. New York: Springer.

[2] Berscheid, E., WALSTER, E (1974). A little bit miss love. In t. Huston, foundations of interpersonal attraction. New York: Academic Press.

[3] Schachter, S., Singer, J (1962). Cognitive, Social, and PHYSIOLOGical Determinants of Emotional. Psychology review (69). 379-399.

[4] Jeffrey Rutstein. (1981). Passionate Love and the Misattribution of Artal. The American psychology association (01), 56-62.

[5] Sternberg, r.j. (1986) .atriangularlyOflove.PsychologyReview, 93,119 ± 135.

[6] John L Cotton. (1981) .a Review of Research on Schrcmsr ’s Theory of Emotion and the Misattribution of Arousal*.european Journal Psychology (11), 365-397.397.

[7] Public Class of Yale University: Introduction to Psychology

[8] Nisbett, R. E. And Schachter, S. (1966).

288. [10] Singerman, K. J., BORKOVEC, T. D., and Baron, R. S. (1976). 'Failure of a "Misattribution therapy" manipulation with a clinically releven.

221.

Author: Wu Wei

Source: Jingshi Psychological University Hall (ID: bnupsychology)

- END -