Niu Eyes | In the age of the whole people, please respect the right to "not be broadcast"

According to media reports, recently, a citizen of Wuhan, Hubei reported that when he was cutting his hair, the hairdresser actually lived with 4 mobile phones at the same time. She asked to stop being called "outdated." Barber also said that the live broadcast is normal, and it is not a star. What are the common people? According to reporters, the hairdresser promised to ask the customer's opinion before the live broadcast. The incident caused heated discussions.

The corners of this time caused by the live broadcast seem to have been solved, but many netizens who follow this news believe that they will feel the same: in the age of the whole people, the situation of "live broadcast" unexpectedly encountered it. Can ordinary people reject "live broadcast" rationally?

The barber will be pulled into the live broadcast room, the dining of the Internet celebrity restaurant will be photographed, walking on the street may enter the perspective of outdoor live broadcast ... If the prevalence of the Internet gives netizens more opportunities to speak, "everyone has a microphone", In the age of entering the live broadcast, the pervasive live shooting brought "everyone has a camera", which also led to more and more unexpected "live broadcast" incidents caused discussions.

As a marketing method and innovative services, the live broadcast and cargo have improved the consumer experience, better adapting to the interaction needs of netizens, and also stimulated consumer vitality. But how can you be treated as "being broadcast" as an individual who does not want to participate? First of all, ordinary people have their own right to portrait and privacy. In public places, if some anchors are "live broadcast" if they are not allowed, they have the right to ask the other party to stop shooting. As a live broadcast, others have lived. First of all, the permission of the subject is permitted, otherwise it is suspected of infringement, which is a bottom line.

Secondly, everyone can be an anchors, but some live broadcasts are for public purposes such as public welfare. Some live broadcasts are purely out of personal hobbies. The purpose of the goal is also different. Personal live broadcasts are fulfilled in the case of legal compliance and no hindrance to others. What about the object of the camera for free transfer? For example, if the word "no loss to customers" has been brought, it actually covers the fact that the customer's legitimate rights and interests are involved.

The empowerment of mobile Internet technology makes "everyone can be famous for 15 minutes" is getting closer to the status quo of social media. In fact, many of the live broadcasts we usually see are indeed participants. There are no shortage of participants. Many people who have been broadcast live will not be angry or accountable. However, live broadcast is a means of serving human beings. Some people like to present their own work and life, and some people are not keen to disclose their daily life. How can it be consistent if necessary? Some people do not want to be "broadcast live" without my recognition. On the contrary, it is a reasonable demand. For ordinary people, they can refuse loudly in the face of such "live broadcasts" that are not allowed, because this is to protect their legitimate rights and interests. If the merchant refuses to be broadcast live is "outdated", there is no basis. Customers and netizens should be alert to similar "pseudo -fashion PUA".

Since the rise of the Internet, there are many reflection on the real world and the virtual world boundary. Seeing the above news, I can't help but make people "think carefully" and think of "The World of Chumen". When we enjoy the various dividends brought about by the development of the Internet, we do not mean that everyone has no privacy. Whether it can be "live broadcast" seems to be a normal problem, but it is related to the "red line" principle of the boundary between the live and privacy, and it is also related to the online media literacy participating in the live broadcast.

The network live broadcast is in full swing. We are happy to embrace the advancement of technology and enjoy the convenience and fun it brings to work and life. But at the same time, the right to "not be broadcast" should also be respected.

Commentator Xue Bei

Edit: Qin Xiaoyi

- END -