Discuss "Jia Qianlian", the fact is clear.

Following the "Explanation on the Development of Member Development in 2022" on September 2nd, the study decided not to include Jia Qianlian in the 2022 new membership list, and related public opinion continued to ferment on the Internet. On September 3, a protest letter signed "Jia Qianlian" "Give me a reason, why can't I join the Chinese Writing Association" spread widely on social media, making many netizens think that this is from Jia Qianqian's " Counterattack. However, some media reported on September 4 that this article was not written by Jia Qianqian himself. On the same day, Jia Qianqian also rumored that the three poems that had been rumored for more than a year were not his work.

In just a few days, the complicated and reversal of related information made netizens overwhelmed. Since the list of members to be developed by the Association of Writers last month, Jia Qianlian and his poetry have always been a hot spot for netizens. However, in the loud discussion, some individuals or platforms also appeared to use the attention of netizens to "heat up" to carry out the operation of Zhang Guanli and fabricated out of thin air. We believe that although the literature and art are subjective, the public opinion field requirements are true, and it cannot allow the "smoke bomb" to diffuse. All views and discussions in the public opinion field should be based on the facts. The facts and truths are constructed by all parties. This is also the deserved meaning of clear network space.

Jia Qianqian's rumors about the online poetry also reminded netizens to mixed the online information of online information. If the rumor is true, then the motivation of the three poems that belong to Jia Qianqian at first is doubtful. However, some netizens have suggested that Jia Qianqian responded too late. As a party, the writer was used to speak by his work. If it was his own work, he should accept criticism if he did not write well; but if not, he hadn't written it before, and he couldn't set it on Jia Qianqian.

For netizens, it is a good thing to increase the degree of vigilance of network information, but the ability to verify the information for personal verification of information is limited. The platform and relevant departments have both the ability to verify and the responsibility of the relevant departments. For relevant departments, whether these three poems were written by Jia Qianlian, it is not difficult to verify. For the online platform that published a false protest letter, the source of the articles and the authenticity of the signature is a "flaw". The person in charge of the website said, "Proper (not important), the key is that the fact is important. I think this article is well -founded and stands up, and I reposted." This statement obviously couldn't stand. As a key place for output information and viewpoints, literary platforms should also strengthen the identification and facts of objective information. This is not a complicated truth. Since "facts are important", it is more necessary to approve the facts.

Over the years, many public events in the Internet environment have often experienced repeated "breaking news" and "rumors". It should be said that this has something to do with the instant sharing and communication of fission -type fission in the mobile internet era. However, we believe that as long as we work together in all aspects, we can clear the public opinion cognitive environment of the public in the scope of power, and more rational discussions and less false information. The mainstream media is the main force leading public opinion, but we also need the parties, units involved, and self -media platforms in public events to strengthen their sense of responsibility.

For literary and artistic creation, we not only encourage hundreds of flowers, but also welcome hundreds of schools. This is a compulsory course for outstanding works and filters to eliminate inferior works. In recent years, many "working poets, children's poets, and farmers' poets have emerged in the literary circles. We believe that good works will endure the test of time, and those dross will definitely die with the wind.

This article is the "Global Times" commentary, the original title: discuss "Jia Qianlian", the fact is clear and critical

- END -