After being "bombarded" by Simba, Liu Genghong apologized and praised: When did the selling fake become a glory?

As a fan of Liu Genghong.

This article is a bit sharp and may offend a group of people, but I still have to write.

On August 30, the former "Fast Brother" anchor Simba published a long article, and the news of "reporting" net red Liu Genghong and others sold fake bird's nests and burst into hot search.

Subsequently, Liu Genghong's company and MCN Hangzhou Wheat Air Corporation, who were in charge of live broadcasting, all responded.

Liu Genghong himself also recognized the facts through Weibo and apologized.

From the news of the news, you can see:

The Liu Genghong couple introduced in the live broadcast that this bird's nest "zero adds, no preservatives, can eat healthy and natural."

Below the live broadcast room, the bird's nest is 398 yuan.

One anchor with a goods, reporting another Internet celebrity, this matter is really amazing and complicated.

But I did not expect that a more amazing scene appeared in the comment area of ​​online reports.

Some netizens praised Liu Genghong's apology: serious and responsible, responsible!

Some netizens shouted to Liu Genghong: Coach Liu, don't be affected by this incident, we will always believe you.

Some people think that Simba is playing a small report.

Some people scolded Simba as a villain: it was raining by themselves, so it was necessary to ride others' umbrellas.

Some people simply said: This is jealous.

Looking at these messages, I was stunned.

Yes, Liu Genghong is a well -known Internet celebrity. With one person's power, he has driven the wave of mass fitness.

But is it true that he sells fake bird's nest?

After selling fakes, and then apologizing, they were praised as responsible and responsible;

After selling fake goods, it was comforted "It's someone else's eyes, you must not be affected because of this";

The principles of selling fakes are committed, and some people say that they should support to the end.

How is this going?

Is there a problem with my three views, or is there something inadvertently?

This world should not be like this.

Today, let's talk about this matter.

Can Simba report Liu Genghong?

In the case of Liu Genghong's couple selling fakes, many netizens talked about Simba:

"Also broke the news, look at yourself first."

"Typical death, you have to pull the back, let's go crazy."

In a word, they felt that Simba had a stain selling fake goods.

Therefore, Zimba not only reports the mean means, but also the motivation for reporting is also doubtful.

Two years ago, the "Bird's Nest Incident" caught Simba into the vortex of public opinion, and eventually ended with a cumulative compensation of 61.89 million yuan and a letter of apology from Simba.

The negative impact of the "Bird's Nest Incident" has always been accompanied by the "Simba family" and continues to this day.

However, don't forget that even if it is an imperfect reporter, there is the right to break the news.

Don't forget, this time Simba is a real -name report.

Real -name reports means that he has to bear more pressure, and it means that he has to face all kinds of unknown risks.

This time Simba reported was celebrities and net celebrities. Behind them have the power that cannot be seen.

What's more, the products he reports is what you and I may buy on the online platform.

Therefore, no matter what Simba has done in the past, no matter what the motivation he has now.

As far as things are discussed, I don't oppose him in this matter.

After all, for most people, we are not a member of the rice circle, but the most common consumers in real life.

I like you, watch your live broadcast, buy your product, and increase your popularity.

You sell fake things for me.

It must not work.

reader

Does Liu Genghong have "exemption"?

I noticed that some netizens had two reasons for Liu Genghong's defense. There were two main reasons.

One is that this incident has been two years, and Liu Genghong has also been dealt with; the other is at least he helped us get health, telling us that fitness can change life.

So don't care too much.

However, even if it happened two years ago, even if it was dealt with, it did not mean that this matter did not exist.

There are many fields in the society, and there is a life -long accountability system.

Why did you even be erased in the field of live broadcast?

In addition, teaching fitness and selling fakes is not the reason for the latter.

Liu Genghong is a public figure.

This means that he is more stricter and stronger than ordinary people. If you make a mistake, you will be punished by morality and system.

You can't tolerate the faults he can see because of whose fans, let alone justify him and find various reasons for him.

Liu Genghong does not have a special exemption.

Each netizen's consumption is support for Liu Genghong, and he trusts him; it is not worthy of praise for the corresponding responsibility and the punishment he should have to sell fakes.

One of the words we hate most is called "dual standard".

We can't accept it. The same thing has two results in different people.

Because this represents inequality, and you may be the next victim.

We hate the dual standards, and we have done what they do, but they have become the one who is unconscious.

It's not normal.

Need Internet celebrity justice

Still need facts and justice

It is certain that Liu Genghong's fake sales incident is not the first in the live broadcast, nor can it be the last together.

Because, the live broadcast is really a gold mine.

Some netizens once listed the Internet celebrity income of the "May Day Congress" last year.

In just one day, the income of net reds was hundreds of thousands, or even millions. An ordinary person can work for a few years to catch up with the single -day income of the Internet celebrities.

This world is really magical.

Of course, we do not oppose the wind and trend of the times, and get high income.

It is also a ability to stay in place.

However, we require that some bottom lines should not be easily broken.

For example, the quality of the products sold should be too good;

For example, the people set up by the Internet celebrities should be true, not packaging and fiction, and not to tell stories; for example, if idols make mistakes, netizens should be angry, and do not forgive him because they are fans. everything.

After all, in the final analysis, Internet celebrities or anchors are just a kind of identity, not to refer to others.

It doesn't mean that everything he does is justice.

We don't need "Internet celebrity justice."

We need to see the factual justice.

Finally, let me use two words as the end.

At any time, don't hang up at your own high;

Never report a serious online leave report as an attack on idols, and see as a lace news;

Never be the person who is too silent.

Source: panoramic vision

The other paragraph is like this:

Being able to express his views independently, but not arrogant; seeing the weak knows sympathy, sees the facts without deliberately distorting, and seeing evil can know anger. In this way, he can be regarded as a real citizen.

The goodness of society is inseparable from the distinction between right and wrong, transparent and firmness of ordinary people, and compassion with compassion.

I hope Liu Genghong can listen to the "different voices" on the Internet this time.

Take remedial measures, cherish your feathers, and don't let the trust of fans anymore.

And each of us must be the transparent and bright person.

Author: Hi everyone, I am crispy, a new dad, a startup executive. I have been to many cities and have also practiced stalls on the side of the road. Now I just want to tell you the most true words, continue to grow, and continue to improve. Source: Mr. Crispy (ID: CPXS2009).

- END -