Hot Comment 丨 Live Broadcasting era, don’t forget you, I have the right to say "no" to the camera

Zhejiang News Client commentator Liu Xiaoqing

Recently,#近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近 近. According to media reports, Ms. Zhou Zhou complained that the hairdressers had a live hair cutting process without her permission. After Ms. Zhou refused, the other party also said that it was not a star, and ordinary people were not terrible. The incident caused heated discussion among netizens. Many people said that "no common sense, uncomfortable", "behavior that hates to take pictures" ...

Rufa said that he opened the live broadcast to attract more potential customers of the "cloud", but this kind of cross -border behavior that did not be permitted was angry, but he took the real customer in front of him. After spreading, it also has the reputation of the dear diviner. The lens can indeed enlarge the advantage of a person, but it will also make the shortcomings nowhere to be hugged. This sale is actually not cost -effective.

Nowadays, we have entered the era of pan -broadcast of "everything can be broadcast live". Everything in the world and big things in the world may become the "guests" in the live broadcast room. Tracking typhoons, recording infrastructure, onlooing rescue ... Live broadcast gives us the opportunity to "experience" the first scene. Eating, sleeping, studying, shopping, traveling ... live broadcast also gives everyone a channel to share life. It is not new to use amateur as the protagonist. Someone teased: In the era of pan -live broadcast, everyone may appear in the lens of others.

But the normalization of live broadcast does not mean that it can be random and disorderly. Some time ago, the "chat -type live broadcast" also caused a lot of people's disgust: too late to react, the camera came to the front; when he didn't know each other, he asked Dong to ask. The reason why this live broadcast becomes a "traffic password" for social media platforms is because it satisfies the "spy desire" of some netizens. There are no scripts, unpredictable reactions, and the jerkyness of passers -by facing the camera ... These are key attractive factor, and they are also full of metaphors of gaze and peeping. After the camera, these netizens have reached the vent of personal desire.

"It is common" does not mean that it is right. The close blending of live broadcast and real life cannot be a "reasonable excuse" that violates the privacy of others. In the face of the camera, "no" is the legitimate right of each of us. Just as the hairdresser said, "others can accept being broadcast live", this is actually a saying that "moral abduction" means. Obviously, the live broadcasts violated the privacy of ordinary people. In the end, it seemed to be unhappy because ordinary people were "unable to let go and too true", and the wrong prescription was quietly transferred. You know, even if the live broadcast is common, the premise is to obtain the consent of the parties, otherwise it will violate the other party's privacy and portrait rights. This gate cannot be opened because of "accustomed to".

Extreme incidents have also reflected the weakness of many anchors' legal awareness. In the live broadcast room, they are the "technical experts" that shuttle on different platforms, but they are also "legal fools" who are not known about infringement. Some people say that the live broadcast is like air, and it is omnipotent, but respect for the legitimate rights and interests of others should be like air and indispensable.

To break this situation of "people in the mirror", more people need to be as brave as Ms. Zhou. The fermentation of this incident is also a good law education. It allows more anchors to understand that it is not "all things can be broadcast live", and it must be legal and orderly; let more ordinary people understand Rights must learn to use the law to defend their rights bravely.

- END -