Extremely review | Women's hair cutting refuses to live "is not a star", ordinary people have the right to be photographed

Ji Mu News commentator Qu Jing

"He took the 4 mobile phones to take a picture of me, I disagree, he said I was outdated!" Recently, Ms. Zhou, who lives in Xinwan Road, Jianghan District, reported through the message board of Wuhan City. It was found that the hairdresser actually used 4 mobile phone to broadcast hair cutting. She asked the hairdresser to stop the live broadcast. The other party did not immediately move away from the camera. She also said that she was "outdated". "It's not a star. What are the ordinary people afraid of?" (According to the Yangtze River Daily on September 1)

The live broadcast room of the hairdresser involved (Source: Live Software Screenshot)

When Ms. Zhou proposed that she did not want to be broadcast live, the hairdresser's attitude was surprising. He believed that the live broadcast had no loss to customers, and also said that "other customers are very happy to show their faces in the live broadcast." He used the portrait of the customer without authorization to disclose the personal life of the customer, or the honor of the customer. This inexplicable pride is really unclear.

Although it is known that the live broadcast is hot and wild "anchors" are everywhere, but cutting a hair should be broadcast live by four machine positions at the same time. This feeling is really uncomfortable. Those who like to interact with the Internet may not be disgusted, but they feel novel and interesting, but the barbershop should never pedal their noses on their faces and take live customers as taken for granted. Because, like Ms. Zhou, like Ms. Zhou, I just want to cut my hair freely and not want to be watched by strange vision from the Internet. This is a very legitimate demand and should be respected.

The hairdresser also said that the barber industry is now promoting through live broadcasts and short videos, which means that there is no need to fury. But he seemed to ignore that promotion is the needs of merchants, but not the obligation of customers. Customers spent money to cut their hair. The hairdresser has made craftsmanship, and then broadcasts it as a material, and makes a traffic money. This abacus is really fine! Customers are unwilling to be onlookers on the Internet, and they are also said to be outdated. The ridicule is not a stars, but they are also poor. This consumption experience is really sour.

Moreover, he said nothing. Because the stars are public figures, part of the income comes from public attention, and due to the high popularity, the stars' words and deeds will have a certain demonstration effect. The part of them is about public interests, and it is also related to the public's right to know. For example, is there any? Is the tax evasion and tax evasion, whether it violates public order, good customs, etc., so the reasonable transfer of some privacy rights to the public is a respect for the public's right to know the public, and it is also a manifestation of the supervision of the masses.

Instead, ordinary people have no responsibility. As long as they do not do illegal and illegal, they do not violate public interests. Of course, ordinary people have the right to refuse to be subject to the camera and be harassed by live broadcast. Without the permission of the parties, any merchant and individual, whether it is profitable or non -profit, is suspected of infringing the right to portrait of others, and in some cases, they are suspected of infringing on the privacy of others. It is precisely because it is an ordinary person and lacks the experience of responding to public opinion. For this kind of live broadcast in the name of "fun", shooting needs to be more vigilant and cautious, but also pay attention to self -protection. Ms. Zhou's awareness of rights protection is very strong, and it is worthy of praise to actively protect her rights and interests with legal means.

Some merchants may have any misunderstandings about "live broadcast normalization". You like to live broadcast, live your own store, and live your own technology. Even if you are dazed in the live broadcast of 24 hours, it is also personal freedom, but as long as it involves others, you must Consider the wishes and rights of others. Even regular media do news programs, passers -by want to face mosaic or use back treatment. Where can the barber shop be confident, and use 4 lenses to face the unknown customers with 4 shots? Ms. Zhou was so angry that she was very polite. It was really more real customers. I am afraid that the court would see it.

Earlier, some online celebrities' live broadcasts of diners have caused huge controversy; there are also outdoor live broadcasts, and unrelated passers -by are shot into the camera, leading to disputes. The more popular the communication forms such as live broadcast and short video, the more importantly, the more attention to the protection of ordinary people. In particular, various types of operators should not be lost in the vortex of traffic on the Internet. "Must ask every shot" is the basic legal consciousness and the minimum respect for consumers.

After the reporter involved, after the reporter's law, I said that "the customer did not agree in the future, and I moved the camera away." This was actually not in place. When the customer entered the door, I didn't know that there was a camera waiting. The correct approach should be that the camera should not be aimed at the customer at the beginning. If the customer agrees to shoot, move it over again, don't turn the order.

- END -