He was ridiculed by the hairdresser for "outdated" because of his hair clipping and refusing to live broadcast: whether the live broadcast is the main business or the haircut or the main business?| Jiupai Time Review

【Source: Nine Pai News】

Happy to chec

The anger rushed out of the door without cutting his hair.

Not the hairstyle is cut,

It was because the haircut was "outdated."

Recently, when Ms. Zhou cut her haircut near her own hairdressing shop, she found that a hairdresser had a process of cutting her hair on her hairpiece without her permission. Ms. Zhou felt uncomfortable and asked the hairdresser to stop the live broadcast. Instead of the other party, the other party did not immediately move away from the camera, but also said, "The live broadcast has no loss to customers'," Other customers are happy to show their faces in the live broadcast "," Not a star, ordinary people, ordinary people What are you afraid of? "Ms. Zhou left the barber shop without cutting her hair.

The live broadcast room of the hairdresser involved (Source: Live Software Screenshot)

"He took a picture of me with 4 mobile phones, I disagree, he said I was 'outdated'!"

"He did not agree with me to shoot me, and it became my fault?"

It is not a customer who is wrong. The wrong thing is to treat the live customers as a granted hairdresser.

First of all, does the live broadcast have no loss to customers? In fact, the live broadcast in the country has the risk of being maliciously edited and damaging the personal image. More importantly, without the consent of the parties, the live broadcast and exposure of others themselves were suspected of illegal. Professor Liu Zhengquan of Wuhan University Law School said that the hairdresser's behavior of the haircut process of the haircut with the customer violated the customer's privacy and portrait rights. Customers have the right to ask the infringer to stop shooting and apologize. If the other party refuses to cooperate, customers can retain live video content and consumer records, and go to the Consumer Association to complain or prosecute the court. According to the specific infringement, the infringer shall bear civil liability such as eliminating the impact, restoration of reputation, and apology, or be fined and detention.

Secondly, many people agree to show their faces, which does not mean that everyone agrees. Faced with the "live broadcast", ordinary people have the right to say "no". They do not want to cut their hair and have been sent to the Internet to say the right of three and four. This is the legitimate demand of customers and a self -protection. As a hairdresser, he did not respect the wishes of customers, and also mocked customers. Even the most basic respect can not be done. Who is the thought and quality of their thoughts and quality?

Barber shops have been promoted and drained through live or short video platforms. However, it should not be inverted "live broadcast" and "haircut". It is the king who is honest and honest. Blindly emphasizing live broadcasts, emphasizing video recording, and care of the number of people and traffic in the live broadcast room will inevitably be distracted during the haircut. At that time, the hairstyle will not be cut well. Who is responsible for this dumb loss?

The era of live broadcasts is coming, which does not mean that there is no boundaries between live broadcast and privacy. When you shoot, you must ask as the foundation and the embodiment of respecting customer rights. Customers spend money to cut their heads, so they do not show their faces in the live broadcast. Otherwise, it will violate the customer's wishes and pull the customer's live broadcast. The customer tells everyone in the live broadcast room, don't come, the cut is too bad, then the bamboo basket is water, and nothing can be caught.

Jiupai comments submitted mailbox: [email protected]

The copyright belongs to the original author and pays tribute to the original

- END -