Leaves the space for elastic treatment for "one -minute" food

Elephant News commentator Chen Si

If the food bought by the consumer is not a "one minute" and "one day", then the behavior of claims will inevitably get one -sided support. It is the harshness of this "one minute" that leaves a space for discussion.

It was too short for a minute. In this case, whether the buyer is for consumption or for profit, I am afraid it is difficult to say clearly.

If the expiration of "one minute" is compensated, what about one second?

Too rigid penalties will allow merchants to be in a dilemma when dealing with related periods. Obviously is still in the shelf life, but can only be removed in advance. Otherwise, there are customers who take a few laps, and then go to claim, ordinary merchants can't stand it. China ’s booming“ Lishu Food ”supermarket will face the development of“ Tianyu ”.

Furthermore, there are more and more "fresh food" products that are only three or two days in Shangchaoli. If the food is normal for one minute to expire, the fresh food of the shelf life can only be put in two days. If the shelf life is two days, it can only be set for one day.

This is not consistent with the spirit of "quality assurance", and it is also contrary to the concept of non -waste food.

"One -minute" food requires elastic treatment space.

- END -