The "expiration 1 minute" is true, helping to raise the awareness of the rules ｜ Yangtze River Comment

On August 31, a case disclosed by the media attracted much attention online. Customer Xiao Li bought a bottle of yogurt at the supermarket and found that it expired for 1 minute at the checkout. Xiao Li claimed 1,000 yuan to the supermarket for this and sued to the court. In the end, the two parties reached a settlement. The supermarket compensated Xiao Li 400 yuan.

In order to district a bottle of yogurt, many people will not do that. When we encounter such a thing, we usually return the goods directly.

Compared with most people, Xiao Li's value is highlighted. First of all, he stood up to the house. In this matter, the business operation was obviously incorrect. He did not deal with the timely food in time, and did not remind consumers in a prominent position. Secondly, he has the same basis that according to the Food Safety Law, consumers can be damaged because of food safety standards that do not meet food safety standards, they can ask operators to request compensation for losses. Then he is willing to pay time and energy to pay more time for this "one minute". The expiration of 1 minute or 1 second is overdue. Xiao Li has the right and willingness to put forward his own claims. The mediation result also sitting on the legitimacy and rationality of this claim.

Xiao Li is more true, and the refraction is actually a regular consciousness. Everything is about the rules, and the rules are the common law of each of us. Dare to be true in the face of the rules, and not to let those "1 minute" slip away, Xiao Li's approach is commendable. It is the existence of the little Li that can force the merchant to make the goods better and make more people benefit from this small game game. It is to enhance the general rules of our society in this small thing.

【Edit: Zhao Ke】

- END -