The man did not repent in prison 3 times, inciting others to "touch porcelain" prison, and as a result ...

Driven by the interests, Li Man released the person in charge (once prisoned for theft, fraud, and obstructing testimonies for three times) for 8 years. I issued a clear written response opinion, but Li still did not stop, and later copied and changed the content of the civil mediation letter to form a "legal document" as evidence materials to encourage the petitioners to accuse multiple complaints. On April 27th, the court sentenced Li to eight years and six months in prison for altering state official documents and fraud, and fined 40,000 yuan. After the sentence, Li did not accept it and appealed. On July 14, the Xiangyang Intermediate Court of Hubei Province ruled the appeal and maintained the original sentence.

Steady the family members of the prison friends want to compensate

In 2015, Li's parents who had stricken the person who died of illness due to illness, and the parents of the prisoner Liang, who were ill, filed a state compensation to the prison. After the prison accepted the case, the "Criminal Decision Decision" was issued by the investigation. Li and Liang's parents were dissatisfied with the results of the response. They submitted a reconsideration application to the Hubei Provincial Prison Administration, the Hubei Provincial Higher Court compensation committee, and the Supreme Law Compensation Committee, and were rejected after review by the relevant authorities. In 2016, Liang's parents also commissioned Li as a litigation agent to sue the funeral home to the court, requiring the payment of spiritual comfort, and was rejected by the court to request the lawsuit. Subsequently, Liang's parents appealed, and the Xiangyang Intermediate Court for mediation to the case and made a civil mediation letter.

In addition to petitioning and appeal to prisons and courts, Li also went to the Procuratorate of the Society of Xiangyang City to petition for the Procuratorate of Xiangyang City. After several receptions, the prosecutor told him that he had not been entrusted by the parties or his family members to petition for Liang. Li turned his head to persuade Liang Father and asked Liang Father and him to accuse the prison police in violation of law enforcement. Father Liang had decided not to investigate, and Li had informed that Father Liang would easily give up at this time not only could not recover justice and not get compensation. Under the instability of Li, Father Liang and Li went to the Procuratorate of the Suburban District of Xiangyang City to report the prison police officer. After the academy was accepted, it was reviewed that the father's report was not true and issued a notice of not making a case.

STD document as "evidence"

Seeing that there was no reason to continue to petition, Li Mou moved his brain on the civil mediation letter. According to Li's confession, it has changed its own "no scientific legal basis, Liang died of illness" and other content in the civil mediation letter. In June 2018, Li mail the official document to the Hubei Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Supervisory Commission, requiring the prison police to account for accountability. In June of the same year, Li also fictional the police of the Prison Letters and Calls Division of the Prison, and applied for national compensation to the prison for the fact that he had disabled the right upper limb.

In the investigation of Li's petitioning incident, the prison compared the civil mediation letter submitted by Li with the original solution from the court, and found that the mediation letter submitted by Li had obvious text content. The prison then reflected this clue to the Procuratorate of the Procuratorate of Xiangyang City. The person in charge of the procuratorial office immediately judged that Li might be suspected of altering the official document of the state organs, and immediately assisted the Prison Police Police Police Police to report to the public security organs.

After the public security organs filed the case, they sent the documents to the Xiangyang Public Security Judicial Appraisal Center for identification. The appraisal results show that the first to the second page of the civil mediation letter submitted by Li is a black and white copy, and the third page is a color copy. The printing text is a colorful laser printing. At the same time, after further inspection, it was found that Li submitted his appraisal of the Xiangyang Justice Judicial Appraisal Institute after the dating of the muscle diagram report and the MR check report of the MR check report for a traffic accident, and deceived the appraisal opinion of "right upper limb injury and disability". The book is used to accuse the disability by the prison police officer violations of the law.

Arrested on the spot, no regrets after returning to the case

On June 4, 2021, Li once again brought Liang Father to the Procuratorate of Xiangyang City. The prosecutor's police officer's visit to the two immediately stabilized the two and called the prison to contact the public security organs to handle the case to arrest Li. After Li returned to the case, the prosecutor used the facts to explain the legal consequences of illegal petitions to Father Liang. After patient interpretation, the old man over the age of seventh was shocked and expressed regret.

After investigation, the public security organs were investigated that after the release of the sentence in 2011, Li took the initiative to find Father Liang, saying that he had served in a prison in the same prison and asked Liang to petition with him. Give him 70 %. Father Liang did not understand the law, so the mediation letter issued by the court was held by Li, and his petitions and mailing materials were also processed by Li, and Father Liang directly signed the fingerprint.

In July of this year, after the court trial, Li Mou framed the facts of the facts to frame the facts and altered the official documents of the state organs, intending to be punished by others. The purpose is fictional facts, concealing the truth, and intending to deceive the huge amount of public and private property. The behavior constitutes a crime of fraud, and the crime should be punished. Li had a criminal department, and after the case was returned, he had no regrets and punished him as appropriate. judgment.

(Source: Procuratorial Daily Author: Dai Xiaowei Chen Chen Zhang Qiang)

- END -