Extraordinary Review | The exam of the public institutions is now a cliff -like difference, and the vulnerability of cheating should be blocked!

Polar News commentator Wu Shuangjian

Recently, in Huangping County, Guizhou Province in 2022, in the public recruitment staff in the public institutions, a cliff -type difference in multiple positions caused questions from candidates. On August 26, the web of the Huangping County People's Government of Guizhou Province released a re -examination list of public institutions. Among them, 11 candidates in the exam were cheating, and their results were considered invalid. (According to Beijing Youth Daily on August 27)

According to the previously announced written test scores, most of the first place is more than 90 points, the second is more than 60 points, and the difference is about 30 points.

Candidates have a cliff -type difference (screenshot of the network)

The results of the test results should be uniform. If the first place in a post and the second place is 30 points, it is understandable that this is the case for multiple positions. Do you have to doubt your life: Is the first place that is not good?

Candidates have a cliff -type difference (screenshot of the network)

Some netizens said that more than 90 points for the exam exams for public institutions are not easy, because the content involved crosses multiple disciplines; some netizens said that the problem is not difficult, but it is not enough to finish all ... The content and test papers are different. Netizens have said so much, that is, this test is difficult. Some people point out that these cheating people seem to do not understand "control points", and they can't wait to do a full score to feel practical.

Candidates have a cliff -type difference (screenshot of the network)

True tests need to be true, and the recruitment of public institutions should also be cleared.

The examination of the public institution was called the "iron rice bowl". Many people think that taking a preparation in hand, the "996" of the big factory is much more comfortable. As a result, the current "test fever" and "testing the heat" continued to retreat, and many people scratched their heads and drilled inside. So, does this indicate that there are still vulnerabilities in anti -cheating, should it be made up?

There are no details in the local area, but we should still reflect on it.

Because cheating success is often not fighting alone. You know, there are also many links that can be cheated. From the trial questions before the test, to the candidates in the exam, it is possible to cheat with tools and the monitoring teacher to release water. Even, it is not possible to eliminate cheating appear in the scroll session.

A county's public institution recruited examinations, 11 people participated in cheating, which was not a small number. So do they cheat through unified channels, methods, or cheating differently? Is it leaked before the test, or is it to release the water in the exam? All kinds of questions should be given to a local.

Cheating in the exam, one is these referencers, suspected of illegal or even suspected crimes, and they are not qualified to enter public institutions at all. The local call for cheaters are "invalid", which is only the first step. The second is that such a suspected illegal or even suspected crime, Huangping County, Guizhou Province cannot stop the cheating person's "performance is not effective". The public security department should also be involved in the investigation. Essence This is also an important aspect of leakage.

In addition, it is even more worthwhile to wake up. If these cheating people have the ability to "control points" and do not pursue more than 90 points of high scores, wouldn't it be "abnormal"? If these illegal people enter the public institutions, it is terrible to think about it.

In other words, there must be no empty person to drill. Preventing the problem before engaging in the test, to prevent various high -tech cheating tools in the exam, prevent the proctor from the water from various human interests, etc., and finally need to shine the sword to make the person who violates the discipline.

Otherwise, cheating behaviors rely on various "abnormal" stuffing, leaving only more questions to the public.

- END -