Multi -linkage interpretation of administrative disputes, Chengdu four places jointly held important meetings

Cover reporter Zhong Xiaolu intern Peng Chunhua

In order to promote the construction of a diversified solution mechanism for administrative disputes and the resolution of contradictions and disputes, it will promote the modernization of grassroots governance systems and governance capabilities. On August 26, the four places of Wenjiang District, Lugu District, Dujiangyan City, and Chongzhou City of Chengdu jointly held a joint meeting of the Parade of Administrative Disputes.

At the scene, Guo Yan, the party secretary of the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court, and Xiong Ying, a member of the Party Group and Deputy Director of the Chengdu Judiciary Bureau, unveiled the first "Administrative Dispute Diverse Interlinter Center" in Chengdu. Exchange Center Implementation Plan. Xu Erzhen, the party secretary and dean of the Chongzhou Court, released the four places in the Four Places Court of Four Places in 2021 administrative trial White Paper.

Xiong Ying pointed out that under the new situation, we must give full play to the advantages of the courtyard, actively promote the substantial resolution of administrative disputes, improve the administrative level in accordance with the law, and continuously meet the diverse judicial needs of the people. It is necessary to strengthen confidence and determination, promote the reform of the administrative reconsideration system at a high quality, give full play to the functions of administrative reconsideration, rights protection, and supervision, and to build a "three same mechanisms" with the cooperation of judicial and law enforcement with Chengdu Central Court. It is necessary to use the work method of "discovering controversy -resolution evaluation -multiple resolution" to substantially resolve administrative disputes.

Deputy Dean Xie Lixin reported the implementation of the administrative trial and trial extension of the city's court in 2021, and filed three opinions on the management of administrative disputes and diversified resolution work: "Strengthen judicial functions and further release administrative trials to resolve administrative disputes. Potential. Strengthen the administration according to law, further stimulate the kinetic energy of law enforcement and reconsideration of the front -end resolution. Strengthen co -construction and governance, and further enhance the effectiveness of the coordinated administrative disputes in the government. "

How to do a good job in front -end prevention, diversified regulation, and substantial resolution of administrative disputes? Guo Yan put forward three requirements: First, adhere to prevention -oriented, mediation priority, and promote the "full cycle governance" of administrative disputes. We must always adhere to the mechanism of settlement of non -litigation disputes. By deepening the governance of the source of administrative disputes and the in -depth application of judicial interpretation centers, make full use of the judicial confirmation procedures, so that administrative disputes are more resolved in the source of the case and build a harmonious place. "Officials and people's relationships".

Guo Yan pointed out that we must adhere to the cooperation of up and down and multi -party cooperation to achieve "comprehensive collaboration" of administrative justice. The construction of the rule of law city is a systematic project jointly participated in the entire society. Administration in accordance with the law is an important part of social governance. It has effectively combined the government's administration in accordance with the law and the court in accordance with the law, safeguarding government authority, and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the relative people. "Construction, to build a national first -class rule of law cities to gather multi -party forces.

He emphasized that it is necessary to adhere to highlighting effectiveness and grasping the key points to ensure that administrative disputes are "solved in the field." It is necessary to pay attention to system concepts, rule of law thinking, and strong base orientation, resolve disputes in accordance with the law in the current legal system, and vigorously resolve cases involving the basic survival rights and major property rights involved in the parties, and strive to achieve the political effects, legal effects, and social effects of disputes. Unity.

- END -