"Western Journalists Corps" just want to find the stubble of China

Hong Kong's "South China Morning Post" August 24th article, the original title: whether it is "wolf war" or "cute rabbit", Chinese diplomats are "unable to win" sub -questions: in the West, now related to reports between China and commented on China The boundaries have been completely blurred. Just like some actors, Chinese diplomats have been shaped by them (Western media)

Some people say that China's "wolf war" diplomats do not serve their country, but they are counterproductive. In fact, regardless of Chinese diplomats, like "hell rabbits" or "good rabbits", (for some people), there is almost no difference. Most of the "mainstream" reporters in the West, especially those from the so -called Anglo circle, have decided that they have to find (China) and provoking their incidents anyway. The various intentions of China -of course, they are not good or unreasonable to them. Most of them are holding prejudice or adopting a series of primary narrative methods.

No matter what the information is or how to pass it, as early as the Chinese diplomats speak, those (Western) media have set up templates for related news reports and social editorials. A hostile (Western) reporter's Corps only repeatedly depicts a hostile China.

For a long time, this impression has been in my mind. But after watching a video of Chinese diplomats in Australia on Australia on August 10th, I remembered this reality again. The Chinese Ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, answered the tone of the response to sound gentle and calm, and even full of humor. He put forward some ideas on how China Australia restarts bilateral relations. However, the Australian political editor of the British "Guardian" describes the scene in this way: "The fierce speech of the ambassador is that China (to Australia) comes out the sound of conditions."

Well, of course, Australia can reject these conditions, and Ambassador Xiao Qian can't talk at least -instead of commands -these conditions? The only fierce voice came from those audiences -almost every problem of the participants to open the game by showing their positions and views or even a straightforward criticism. It doesn't matter, most of my time in my life is a journalist. Yes, we really want people to say what we want to say, not what they want to say.

In view of this, Western reports to China and Chinese diplomacy often need to follow different rules and even participate in different games. When conflicts between them, such as the Australian National News Club, there will be many noise and anger, at least in the reporter's seat, but there is nothing other than that.

Chinese diplomats can be mild or not. My suggestion is: Doing things that suits your personal temperament, because this (Western media) reports or comment on your way, there will be almost no impact. Today, the boundaries between China and commenting in China have become completely blurred. Like some actors, as a Chinese meant diplomat, it has been shaped by (Western media). ▲

Author Lu Gang, Cui Xiaodong translation

- END -