Liu Heping: U.S. proposal advocates incorporating Taiwan into "NATO+", the purpose is very clear

Direct news: The so -called "Taiwan Policy Law" motion launched by the US Congress Senate Cross -Party Division is claimed to be the most comprehensive adjustment of Taiwan's policy in Taiwan since passing the "Relations Law with Taiwan" in 1979. How do you interpret this?

Special commentator Liu Heping: I noticed that the content of the so -called "Taiwan Policy Law" proposal is all -encompassing, which involves almost all aspects of the United States' Taiwan policy, and many of them are quite "explosive", including the United States to re -examine the United Nations. Regarding Taiwan's status in the resolution No. 2758, instructing the Secretary of State to negotiate to rename the so -called "Taiwan's Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the United States" to "Taiwan's Representative Office", formulate policies to assist Taiwan to participate in international organizations, sell offensive weapons to Taiwan, or even sell offensive weapons and even even sell offensive weapons or even sell them. It is to give Taiwan military assistance directly, as well as signing the "US -Taiwan Free Trade Agreement" and allowing Taiwan to join the "Indo -Pacific Economic Framework" and so on.

All in all, this proposal not only fully subverts the three joint communiqués of the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the United States, but even in the "One China" principle in the "relations with the Taiwan". The distinctive characteristics, that is, these terms are listed in these terms, all over the past year, the "Tingtai" eagle forces in the US Congress have been demanding or even forcing the Bayeng government to do it, and the Bayeng government again I have been facing something that I can't do. It is in this case that the American Senator listed all of them in the way of packaging, and was preparing to put pressure on the Biden government again. The timing of this proposal was just to re -examine the preparation of the policies of China in the Bayeng government, especially when the issue of Taiwan began to retreat.

Therefore, I think that this so -called "Taiwan Policy Law" proposal is not so targeted at China. In particular, the Taiwan issue can only be moved forward. In other words, the proposal of this bill is actually the result of the "Tingtai" eagle and pigeons and the courtyard in the United States.

It is worth noting that according to the statement of the proposal in the statement, they proposed that the proposal was due to the Chinese Defense Director Wei Feng and a recent dialogue in Shangri -La, "If someone dares to split Taiwan, China will definitely do not hesitate The ruthless words of war at the expense, and a spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs to put forward the saying that "the Taiwan Strait does not belong to the international waters", so they have to counter them. In my opinion, this is just what the crime is to be added. In fact, there is only one real political background of this bill, that is, the mid -term elections in the United States are coming soon, so they want to fight for the attention of voters on the Taiwan issue. Therefore, we have seen that in recent times, it is not only these two parliamentarians who have proposed similar proposals on Taiwan. Rubio has launched a motion called "Promoting Taiwan Peace Law with strength", which is part of the midterm elections.

In this regard, my suggestion is that we do not need to take these bills too much, because it is not strange to be blamed for their self -defeat. Even if these bills are finally passed, it is unlikely to be executed by the Bayeng government. We don't need to excessively stimulate them, because in the context of Russia and Ukraine's conflict and the mid -term elections are approaching, the situation in the Taiwan Strait in the near future has been in a state of dry firewood.

Direct news: In your opinion, in this so -called "Taiwan Policy Law" bill, can it be implemented in the event that gives Taiwan's "important non -NATO ally" status?

Special commentator Liu Heping: In fact, in the so -called "Taiwan Policy Law" motion, the statement to give Taiwan "important non -NATO ally" status, as early as a year ago, the Republican Republican member Perry had proposed a special bill to ask the White House to bring Taiwan to Taiwan. It is considered a "NATO+" member. Therefore, this "Taiwan Policy Law" proposal is just re -mentioned in cold rice.

Of course, we still have to be highly vigilant for this matter. Everyone knows that joining "NATO+" or "important non -NATO ally", including Japan, Australia, South Korea, Israel, and New Zealand, are all countries with independent sovereignty, and Taiwan is just part of China. No qualifications have become members of "NATO+".

Therefore, the US Congress proposal to make Taiwan a member of NATO+, the real intention behind it is to support "Taiwan independence", and let all NATO member states endorse for this matter. Secondly, I believe that letting Taiwan a member of "NATO+" is just the first step in the "Topai" forces in the United States. After this goal is achieved, they will further operate in the future to make Taiwan a formal member. In this way, Taiwan was included in the collective military protection of NATO. In other words, on the surface, members of the United States Congress only make Taiwan a "NATO+" member, but its real purpose is to make Taiwan a military protection object of NATO. In other words, letting Taiwan a member of NATO is only a shot. The real purpose is actually to pull the NATO to the water and pull it into the muddy water of the future Taiwan Strait. Therefore, this proposal is actually echoing the previous NATO Secretary -General Stoltenberg proposed that NATO should treat China as the object of prevention, and the British Foreign Minister Tras of NATO should be military in the Taiwan Strait. However, this does not mean that Taiwan can really become a member of NATO+. The reason behind this is very simple and straightforward, because once Taiwan really becomes a member of the "NATO+", it means that it has stipulated in the "Anti -split State Law". The occurrence will lead to a major incident that Taiwan is split from China. "In mainland China, it will definitely adopt a non -peaceful way before that to solve the Taiwan issue. In this case, I believe that other NATO member states cannot follow these brainless US Congress members, and they will definitely treat this proposal as a waste paper. Because although the United States is the leading party of NATO, NATO is not a US country. In Turkey's opposition, let alone Taiwan.

In addition, for the Bayeng government, in order to avoid stimulating mainland China, the basic strategy of recently dealing with the Taiwan issue is to only say that it is "unknown and real", that is, on the Taiwan issue, it will not openly break through the existing "one of one" one. The "principle framework, but what to do will do it in private. According to this way of "old conspiracy", I think that the Bayeng government will definitely not let Taiwan a "NATO+" member, but it will definitely work to let NATO's strategic focus move eastward and intervene in the situation in the Taiwan Strait.

Author 丨 Liu Heping, Shenzhen Satellite TV "Live Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan" special commentator

Editor 丨 Li Yi, editor -in -chief of Shenzhen Satellite TV Direct News

Capture 丨 Qiu Hui

- END -