"Fundraising intermediary" draws up to 70%?Where should the water droplets come from?

Recently, the "water droplets" such as "water droplets" such as "water droplets" such as public welfare support for public welfare has been pushed up on hot search because of the chaos of fundraising. Earlier, some media reports said that some so -called "fundraising intermediaries" and "career promoters" will be withdrawn by 50%and 70%of the height during the fundraising process of "assistance".

On August 21, the official statement issued by the water drop ration said that the so -called "fundraising intermediary" was operated by some maliciously promoted third -party business organizations to provide the funding of the funding person with inappropriate fundraising services. Practice, and will not charge more than 3.6%(3%of which are platform service fees, 0.6%are payment channel fees) fundraising fees. The fees exceeding this proportion are all illegal acts that are not allowed to be permitted by the platform. In the future, water drops will continue to improve the platform rules and risk control systems, so that "gray production" practitioners will not have loopholes to drill.

Photo source: Water Drop Global Official Website

For the self -defense of water drops, some netizens expressed their acceptance that the platform was also a victim of illegal operations, and some netizens thought that this was "shaking the pot". The intention was to clarify the responsibility and cover up the platform's supervision of fundraising projects. In any case, the incident once again showed that the fundraising project of the Internet was urgently needed to strengthen external supervision.

In recent years, with the formation of a brand of fundraising platforms such as "water drops", it is increasingly known. More and more people participating in fundraising, their composition has become increasingly "down".

On the one hand, those who do have serious illnesses and economic difficulties, and need to raise funds, because the total number of projects becomes more and more difficult to attract enough attention to obtain funds that can relieve their dilemma; on the other hand,, on the other hand,, on the other hand,, on the other hand There is also a crooked idea of ​​using the love of others, trying to make false cases through the fundraising platform to "suck gold" to deceive the donor's money. Both typical situations have created a living space for the "fundraising agencies" that are profitable. The former is suffering from the fundraising, so he can only compromise with the "fundraising intermediary" that can speak to the lion; the latter does not care about the people's residence, as long as you can get a stroke.

In fact, the so-called "intermediary" is nothing more than a funding for fundraising and promotion. The cost of 50%-70%is obviously beyond the reasonable range. If such chaos cannot be effectively supervised, it will only greatly reduce the credibility of the fundraising platform. After all, if those kind donors know the money they take out, most of them cannot enter the patient's medical account, and they may even be divided by scammers, and they will inevitably become more cautious and even "indifferent". This is not only not conducive to the healthy development of a major illness fundraising platform, but also for those who really need help to close the "door to the opportunity" that is not easy to raise funds.

When public opinion points to the ultra -high of the "fundraising intermediary", the platform cannot be placed out of the matter with the light "not we received". Just like other Internet companies with platform attributes, the platform for fundraising is also the first responsible party for fundraising supervision. If the platform cannot take out powerful regulatory methods, crack down on the "black intermediary" that combat illegal charges, so that the fundraising funds can also help the intermediary without need to help the intermediary. In essence

At present, the chaos of but not limited to the "black intermediary" has formed a significant negative impact on many major disease fundraising platforms. To eliminate these chaos, the civil affairs and Internet management departments should also strengthen investigation, try to establish and improve the regulatory system of Internet disease fundraising as soon as possible, provide authoritative guarantees for specific supervision work, and improve relevant legislative work in a timely manner. With such a multi -pronged approach, we can control the fundraising of Internet diseases and better protect the rights and interests of patients and donors.

(People's Daily Comment)

- END -