Military people who cannot be resettled!

Why did the "Regulations on the Research of Retired Military" soliciting the comments draft only stipulated the scope of the work that could not be arranged, but did the officers be arranged, but did the officers? Is this a kind of negligence and unfair work?

This is a message from a comrade -in -arms, which also makes Xiaobian feel interest. Quickly checked the relevant information, this is really the case--

01

The fifth chapter of the "Regulations" is the transfer of business, and Chapter 6 is to arrange work. Chapter 5 When the officer is transferred, the content is relatively simple. But it is more detailed for the arrangement of retired soldiers. In particular, it is clear that who can arrange work and clarify who cannot arrange work at a glance.

Is it really negligence? In fact, it is because the officer could not arrange a job for a long time ago, and it has been arranged long ago.

The "Interim Measures for the Resettlement of Army Cadres" clearly clarify military cadres under the positions of the regiment level. If one of the following circumstances, it is not included in the military cadre transfer resettlement plan:

(1) Those who are over 50 years old;

(2) Disability above Grade A or above;

(3) If you have severe diseases, you cannot stick to normal work after diagnosis and confirmation of hospitals at or above the hospital hospital;

(4) The review has not yet concluded or the party's inspection is not full;

(5) Those who have been punished by intentional crimes;

(6) Those who have been expelled from the party or are qualified for cadres;

(7) Other reasons should not be resettled by the transfer

Because the "Interim Measures for the Resettlement of the Army" is a policy and regulations that retain the continued use, the relevant content is not carefully expressed, and it is necessary to implement it in accordance with the previous regulations.

The regulations involving retired soldiers 'resettlement "Regulations for Retired Soldiers' resettlement" are abolished with the implementation of the "Regulations on the Research Military Resettlement", and will not be separated from the regulations on retired soldiers. emphasize.

So it doesn't matter, but different ways are taken in different situations.

02

However, I do n’t know if everyone finds no. In the “Regulations on the Reception of Retired Military”, it is not included in the scope of scope of work resettlement, and it is not available in the previous “Regulations on the resettlement of retired soldiers”. In the "Regulations on the Research Soldier", there is only regulations for who can be resettled, but there is no content for who cannot be resettled.

The editor believes that this is by no means "negligence", but the decision made based on the situation and judgment at the time. When the regulations may be formulated, the situation and number of people involved are relatively small, and everyone does not pay attention, and it is rarely involved in the work, so it is not necessary to specifically be specifically clarified.

Now that there is no value for right or wrong, but from the previous saying that "who can", now it is both or not, but it is a clear change and progress. From this we can understand a lot.

On the one hand, this is a summary of experience and lessons. The editor believes that such a change is by no means a temporary motion, but a summary of the problems and experience in the previous resettlement work, in order to avoid many problems.

If you only say that you can do it, let some comrades mistakenly think that as long as the conditions are met, you should be placed. Whether you violate the law or not, it brings a lot of trouble to work. Therefore, adding this content is to avoid problems from happening again.

On the other hand, it is also a distinctive orientation and guidance. If you can let everyone know how to do and what to do, then "not" is to let everyone know what they can't do, and what kind of results will be obtained once they do. Then guide everyone to obey the law, otherwise I have worked hard for more than ten years. In the end, I can't get the qualifications because of their words and deeds.

Finally, such a change is also the inevitable result of the standardization, institutionalization, and regularization of retired soldiers resettlement of retired soldiers. With the establishment of the retired military affairs department, the resettlement of retired soldiers has gradually standardized, institutionalized, and regularized. Many institutional documents are introduced and many old systems are abolished. The editor believes that increasing the clauses that retired soldiers must not be resettled are the supplementary improvement of resettlement work, so that this work is more standardized and orderly, and it is operable. The improvement of these systems will inevitably drive the development of the rule of law overall work and enhance everyone's sense of resettlement and happiness.

03

Some people ask, why does the regulations say "no", or improve the sense of gain and happiness? Isn't it better? If we read related regulations carefully, you can find that these regulations look cold, in fact, warm, including concern and love, in this special way to care for everyone.

This kind of care is not only "Regulations on the Reception of Retired Military", but also the relevant provisions in the relevant provisions of the "Interim Measures for Receiving Retired Gold Metal Monthly" and "Interim Measures for the Resetting of Army".

Here we need to pay attention to the type that cannot be resettled. The types of several regulations are similar, mainly they:

The older, whether it is resettlement or monthly, is not very good for their personal development and life, so it is not included to allow them to retire in the barracks. This is a kind of care.

There is a problem with physical health. Because there is a problem with physical health and cannot be employed as smooth as others, they do not include them, so that they do not have to retire before going to run, with peace of mind.

Illegal and violations of laws and regulations. This is a good understanding that because of violations of laws and disciplines, it is punished, and it is also inevitable to cancel the relevant qualifications. Some people say that this is a bit cruel? I think if it is not punished, it is unfair, and it will be placed on the same month as violations of discipline and law. What do you want those comrades who follow the rules and disciplines. At the same time, although such rules are ruthless, they are aimed at a few people, special circumstances. If you are good, in fact, such regulations are more reminders and urging, but also another form of love.

Other situations. There are more, such as job reasons, reasons for confidentiality, etc., are not allowed to be resettled or monthly.

Therefore, although "no" is uncomfortable, it does make some comrades unable to place it or monthly, but we need to see that all soldiers who are not included in the scope have such why. Is it illegal or illegal. The combing and clarity of these situations contains respect, care, support, reminder, guidance, etc., and is the basis for ensuring the orderly development of this work.

Among them, you need to experience it yourself.

In fact, for those comrades who could not be resettled, Seng lost his horse and knew that he was not blessed. Perhaps this retirement method cannot be achieved, but it has opened another window to success and happiness. There are not no such examples, so if we cannot be resettled smoothly for various reasons, we don't have to complain and uncomfortable. The retirement retirement and the reciprocity of the reciprocity employment independently employment.

As long as we work hard enough in the future, as long as we are strong enough, everywhere we are all good, all are the same.

Tired, you can lie down for a while, but you dare not lie flat all the time!

Point sharing

Point collection

Nap

Click to see

- END -