Social Comment: Bernes Vietnam, the Chinese will not get used to such words and deeds

The US ambassador to China, Burns, has been in office for 6 months in China. The sense of existence has not been very strong, but recently, a wave of "negative" traffic has been brushed through the Perlis. In an interview with CNN last Friday, he accused China of "excessive response", saying "this is a crisis of Beijing". He also said, "The government of Beijing has the responsibility to convince the world elsewhere, and China will act peacefully in the future."

Many American media deliberately aggravated their tone when reporting. The title highlights the US ambassador to China in China that allows China to "must" show that it is not the "unstable factor" of the Taiwan Strait, making Bernus's expression more dazzling and arrogant. As a senior diplomat, the identity is extremely inconsistent.

Since Pelosi, the U.S. government has repeatedly released false information to the outside world, trying to throw the turbulent responsibility of the Taiwan Strait to China. Independent departments; later referring to the situation of the Chinese upgrade, "destroying" the status quo of the Taiwan Strait. Bernus said a lot of things this time, but there was no new idea. The overwhelming and overwhelming was still the set of tactics of Washington's argument in the Perosi incident and the hegemonic logic of hitting one rake.

The Chinese side's position and attitude on the Taiwan issue have been clarified. However, the cause and effect of Perosi to Taiwan is clear. Congress is an important part of the US government stipulated by the US Constitution. Perosi, as the Speaker, represents the United States. Perosi rushed to Taiwan, which seriously violated the promise of no official relationship between the United States and Taiwan, and severely destroyed the current situation of the Taiwan Strait. Washington's provocative behavior is the first, and it continues. In any case, it should be that the United States "must" indicate to the Chinese and other parts of the world that it is not a threat of peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait.

Bernus is generally considered to be a scholar -type diplomat with rich experience. He was vacant for a year and five months before the US Ambassador to China. Those who serve as this position can be said to "be ordered at the time of crisis." However, from his overall performance in the past 6 months, especially in this TV interview, he has not showed a deeper or clever thinking about Sino -US relations and great powers than other politicians in Washington, and he has not promoted Washington to Washington's pair of Washington. Chinese decision -making should play a role.

I have to say that this is very disappointing. In the past six months, Bernus talked about the Chinese internal affairs, far more than his constructive interpretation of Sino -US relations; he participated in various conferences in the United States to talk about Chinese issues. The initiative to take the initiative; he is busy discussing how to deal with China with the allies in China, and he is far more friendly with people in all aspects of China. The situation of Bernus shows that Washington has become a large dye tank, and fewer and fewer people can really "produce sludge". Become the most risk of Bernes and the cheapest choice.

On the same day of Berns' interview, former US Secretary of State Kissinger also accepted an exclusive interview with CNN. The 99 -year -old old man criticized Perosi again to move the stage "unwise", pointing out that the United States and China The tension may evolve into "the biggest challenge facing human beings", which will be far worse than the First World War. Therefore, "discussing the problem that may cause out of control" is the responsibility of the two countries' border. But the problem is that this strategic reason and wisdom has never received enough attention from Washington decision makers, and in the United States, it is still facing a subsequent state. Since the United States is a country with huge destructive power, its state is extremely dangerous to the United States, China, and even the entire world.

In this case, dealing with Sino -US relations should adhere to the bottom line of thinking. I don't know if Bernes have realized that some of their words and deeds have been serious. Do not interfere with the internal affairs is the basic criterion for international relations, and the ambassador abroad must adhere to this bottom line. In addition to the Taiwan issue, Bernus also draws hands on other Chinese politics such as Xinjiang and Hong Kong involved in China several times. The ambassador to China is so "willful". Essence Here we have to say a special saying to Washington that the Chinese will not get used to this kind of cross -border behavior of you, don't say that China's "excessive response" at that time.

Some opinion believes that in the current context, Bernus' space is limited, and the role is embarrassing. This is true to a certain extent, but limited is not equal. In fact, at this important historical juncture today, the actions and special significance of the Ambassador to China should not be underestimated. There are too many bridges in Sino -US relations, and there are too few bridges. If even the ambassador to China comes to dismantle the bridge, the situation will only get worse and worse. In this regard, you may refer to the definition of Chinese ambassador Qin Gang in the United States: it is a bridge and a listener, a helper.