Cities and towns should provide farmers with public services instead of eliminating the right to deprive farmers in rural areas

Against the background of the county's real estate market inventory pressure, it is encouraged to enter the city to buy a house to cause public opinion. "Jiangsu Funing, Jilin Huadian, Guizhou Qinglong, Sichuan Ningnan and other counties have released preferential buying policies for farmers, such as Changchun Housing Security and Housing Management Bureau to give 200 yuan/square meter purchase subsidy. Under the new downward pressure of the economy, in order to expand the domestic demand "to attract people with houses" and "stay by house", farmers abandon the homestead as the exchange conditions for settlement or receiving house purchase subsidies. How can farmers protect their rights and interests on farmers?

In this regard, Lu Huilin, a professor and doctoral instructor of the Department of Sociology and Doctoral of Peking University, said: In the past 20 years, farmers have never stopped from the process of entering the city from the countryside. Some migrant workers have a good income in the city. At the same time, they also have a need for entering the city, such as children going to school, or they want to live in urban life. They become part of the city by buying a house, which is a natural historical process. In fact, the newly -added resident population and the purchase of commercial housing in the county seat are already migrant workers, or farmers. Whether to buy a house in the county and when to buy a house is a complex family decision for every farmer. He needs to be carefully decided according to his own needs and practical conditions.

So today, under the downturn of the housing market, some local governments regarding farmers as a purchase main body such as regional commercial housing destocking and introducing some promotional measures can be understood! But there is danger behind it. For local governments, the destocking of commercial housing is an imminent economic task that needs to be dealt with. When a large number of farmers enter the city, whether it can stay stable for a long time is also a social task that needs to be considered. Otherwise, under the measures of promotion or marketing, some farmers who did not have the conditions did not have the conditions to enter the city to buy a house, which played a certain role in the de -inventory of local commercial housing in the short term, but in the long run, if they will live in the county in the future Then they will be a difficult difficult group that our local government is very difficult to deal with.

Whether the farmers entering the city can stay for a long time, mainly facing two challenges. The first is whether there are a lot of stable non -agricultural employment opportunities, depending on the development level of the local industrial service industry. Another challenge is whether the local area can provide a complete, mature social security, which makes them still have a livelihood guarantee when he is old. Therefore, compared with the urgent commercial housing that sells inventory, the local government should also do to create such a basic condition for farmers who enter the city.

Some local governments use farmers to abandon their homestead as the exchange conditions for settlement, which is a more dangerous approach. I think in any case, we don't have to stare at the small house site of the farmers tightly. This homestead is very important for farmers entering the city. In terms of economic perspective, this homestead is the last guarantee that the farmers entering the city when they encounter difficulties, so that farmers who fail to enter the city have a room for rotation; for the entire Chinese society, it is also the entire Chinese society. When facing some big crises, the society can maintain its toughness and elasticity, so that we can pass the crisis steadily without causing a large shock; as far as the social level, farmers entering the city have to keep in their hometown to protect their hometown. A house site is a very important mechanism that he can maintain an emotional and social level in his hometown.

Many farmers are now entering the city. He does not say that a single is a citizen and a single city -centric. He may have a lot of time to work, live, and train their children in the city. However, he still participates in the social life of his hometown. Then this also allows us to maintain some characteristics of our own society in the process of urbanization and modernization. The small house site, the government retracted it, may have increased some of our land use indicators, but in fact, it is difficult for this homestead to make more economic articles on it, and it is difficult for it to be recovered. The cost of reclamation, or the cost of reclamation is particularly large. But if we take it back from farmers, the consequences are very serious if we take it back from farmers. So I think that under the case, we sell commercial housing so that farmers should not settle in cities in cities. We should not give up the homestead as a exchange condition. This is a bottom line that we should adhere to.

Chinese farmers have contracted land and homestead. He is a collective part of the collective. This is our unique system of Chinese characteristics. On the basis of this system, China's urbanization may get out of a "rooted urbanizationization. "The road, many farmers may enter the city, whether he buys a house or not buy a house, this proportion will continue to increase. Today, our entire urbanization ratio has reached about 65%. As more farmers enter the city, this proportion will increase. Our town, especially the county, should actually play a function of providing public services to the surrounding farmers, rather than saying that the right to eliminate the countryside and deprive farmers. Therefore, today, even if we urgently need to sell commercial housing, we must pay special attention to protecting the rights of farmers, the right to collective members of farmers, his right to contract land and his rights of his homestead. Only in this case, the relationship between cities and villages is a benign mutual structure. The development of the city can allow the farmers who enter the city to enjoy the various conveniences that he cannot enjoy in the countryside. Serve. The construction of rural areas has still a root life that allows farmers who live in modern life. It maintains such an organic connection with its roots, so that we can form a beautiful urban and rural society between us urban and rural areas. (Text: Professor and PhD instructor of the Department of Sociology of Peking University Lu Huilin)

- END -