[Zi Niu Toutiao] denied the killing!The first day of the trial of the second trial of the Lao Rongzhi case was over

Lao Rongzhi, who had been in a life of 7 people and fled for more than 20 years, was sentenced to death for the first trial of intentional homicide, kidnapping, and robbery. At 9:30 am on August 18th, the second trial of the case was tried in the Jiangxi Provincial Higher People's Court. Lao Rongzhi suspected of the crime of intentional homicide, robbery, and kidnapping crime. After a short break at noon, the trial continued until 6:30 pm. At 9 am on the 19th, the case will continue. At the beginning of the second institution, Lao Rongzhi recognized the robbery and theft in some cases, but denied the prosecutor's allegations of his "intentional homicide". The prosecutor believes that Lao Rongzhi conflicts conflicts before and after, and there is no coercion. It is a division of work with Fa Ying during the crime and constitutes a co -crime.

【Case Review】

The first instance of the defendant Lao Rongzhi was crime and the penalty decision was executed

The Yangtze Evening News Zi Niu News reported on the case on December 21, 2021. On the morning of September 9, 2021, the Nanchang Intermediate People's Court of Jiangxi Province made a public judgment on the first instance to the defendant Lao Rongzhi deliberately killing, robbery, and abduction cases. The defendant Lao Rongzhi committed the crime of intentional homicide, robbery, abduction, and punishment. He decided to execute the death penalty, deprived of political rights for life, and confiscated all personal property.

It was found out that the defendant Lao Rongzhi and Fa Ying (have already judged another case) were the relationship between couples. From 1996 to 1999, the two conspired and divided together. Lao Rongzhi was engaged in serving services in an entertainment venue. The object of the case was used to implement violence by Fa Ying. The robbery, abduction, and intentional homicide of Hefei City, Anhui Province. After the incident, Lao Rongzhi absconded with a pseudonym such as "Shirley" and was arrested and brought to justice by public security personnel on November 28, 2019.

The court held that the defendant Lao Rongzhi deliberately illegally deprived the victim's lives with others, and his behavior had constituted the crime of intentional homicide; for the purpose of illegal possession, violent and threatened means to rob the victim's property. For the purpose of abduction of the victims, its behavior has constituted a crime of kidnapping. Lao Rongzhi played a main role in the common crime. The main criminals should be punished in accordance with all the crimes he participated. After Lao Rongzhi returned to the case, he confessed the fact that he was kidnapped in Changzhou. Lao Rongzhi deliberately killed five people to die; the robbery caused one person to die, the amount of robbery was huge, and had a robbery plot; the abduction caused one person to die, the ransom ransom was more than 70,000 yuan. Deep, the personal danger and social hazard are extremely high, and the consequences and crimes are extremely serious, and it should be punished in accordance with the law. Although there are frank plots, it is not enough to punish it lightly. Lao Rongzhi's crime of committing several crimes shall be punished and punished according to law. After the first instance was pronounced, the defendant Lao Rongzhi appealed in court.

It is said that the Dharma is the devil and learned that it was very happy when he was killed

During the first instance, Lao Rongzhi had argued that he was charged with the charges of the public prosecution agency, but he also acknowledged that he was guilty. Lao Rongzhi claimed that he did not conspire with the Fa at the time. It was not his own intention to kill, kidnap, and robbery. Lao Rongzhi has repeatedly expressed his extremely disgusting Fa Ying. She was deceived and threatened by Fa Ying. She was only 19 years old when she followed the French heroes and could not choose. However, there is a conflict between Lao Rongzhi in the court.

Lao Rongzhi said that he was disdainful to follow the Fa Ying to do those crickets, and did not want those dirty money, but was often beaten by Fa. "Fa Ying is a very dangerous person and a devil." Lao Rongzhi once said in court that he had miscarriage twice from 1996 to 1998. On the night of the abortion, Faye Ying also violated her. state. Lao Rongzhi said that when she learned that Faye was shot from the news during the escape, she was very happy and felt that she was harmed for the people.

Liu Jingjie, an agent lawyer of the victim's "Little Carpenter" family member, said in an interview with reporters that when the trial method was in English, he was arrested on the 23rd, but he explained Lao Rongzhi on the 29th, covering his escape, hearing Lao Lao, hearing Lao Lao The news of Rong Zhi was not arrested, and Faye Ying smiled comfortably.

【Direct strike in court trial】

Lao Rongzhi claimed that he was considered a co -prosecution, not the main criminals at 9:30 on August 18th. The second instance of the case was tried in the High People's Court of Jiangxi Province. The trial lasted from 9:30 am to 6:30 in the afternoon, and the court was briefly closed at noon. It can be seen from the second trial scene released by the Jiangxi Provincial Higher People's Court that Lao Rongzhi wore a protective suit, a mask and goggles to enter the court under the escort of the three bailiffs. She looked calm. After the trial began, Lao Rongzhi sat in the defendant's seat and calmly opened the case dose of the case. Subsequently, Lao Rongzhi and his defenders disagree with the jurisdiction of the case, but were rejected by the court according to law.

Lao Rongzhi entered the court under the escort of three bailiffs

Lao Rongzhi said that in 1995, she met Faying Ying by a friend. At that time, she did not know about her experience. After that, she was raped by Fa Ziye. She was worried that her reputation was not good and could not marry themselves, so they did not choose to report the case. Later, Lao Rongzhi said that she also thought about leaving Faying, but was threatened by him, so she had to cooperate with him.

On the day of the trial, the two parties mainly provided a certificate of evidence on the "Nanchang Destroyer Case" and "Wenzhou Rental House Murder Case".

On July 29, 1996, a murderer and robbery occurred in Donghu District, Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province. The criminals killed Xiong Qiyi's family of three, broken corpses, moved corpses, and snatched valuables and cash. In August of that year, the Nanchang City Public Security Bureau issued a wanted order to show that the investigation was investigated. The case was done by Lao Rongzhi and Fazi, and it was attached to the two of them.

In the "Nanchang Destroyer Case", during the trial, Lao Rongzhi acknowledged his robbery and theft, and denied that he had premeditated kidnapping and killing. Lao Rongzhi said that at the time, she pseudo "Chen Jia" and met Xiong Qiyi when sitting on the bar. At the time of the case, Lao Rongzhi said that it was not premeditated beforehand, but that Xiong Qiyi took the initiative to go to the rental house to find her to send air conditioners. Then he was discovered by Fa Ying and then happened. In addition, Lao Rongzhi acknowledged that he had found a property at Xiong Qiyi's house and obtained 2,000 yuan in cash, watches and necklaces. However, she did not recognize the kidnapping or killing behavior. She argued that when she left, she saw that Xiong Qiyi was tied. It was not until 2019 that she knew from the police mouth to know that Xiong Qiyi died.

In the "Wenzhou rental house killing case", two women were killed. Regarding the case, Lao Rongzhi still denied that she was involved in the killing. She argued that she was only responsible for discussing rental with the victims, and Fa Ziying temporarily robbed it. Binding and killing were all the British. Lao Rongzhi's defender believes that the objective evidence of this case is insufficient, and the case can not be finalized by confession. In addition, Lao Rongzhi has no initiative in the control of property and is in a dominant position.

In the trial of the day, Lao Rongzhi's statement had a lot of contradiction with the previous confession of the police. She explained that it was caused by fatigue trials before, and she always thought that she was in a threatening position in the case. However, the prosecutor believes that the confession of French and Lao Rongzhi and witness testimony can prove that Lao Rongzhi is a "Nanchang Destroyer Case" and "Wenzhou Rental House Murder Case". Lord and the prisoner, Lao Rongzhi did not have been coerced.

Acting lawyer of the victim believes

The first trial is very comprehensive, it is unlikely to change the judgment

Zi Niu journalists have repeatedly contacted the second brother and second sister of Lao Rongzhi. They also went to the trial site yesterday. It is understood that Lao Rongzhi has two brothers and two sisters. She ranks the least at home. According to his second brother Lao Shengqiao, he recently saw Lao Rongzhi in mid -July 1996.

Lao Shengqiao and Lao Rongzhi are in a well -known enterprise in Jiujiang. Lao Rongzhi is a teacher at the company's children's children. Lao Shengqiao said that when Lao Rongzhi and Faye Ying interacted, he didn't know much about Faying. At that time, he wanted to do business. His sister said that Ziying had a wide social relationship with Ziying's family. "Later, I learned that they went out to commit such a big case. I don't believe that my sister dares to kill. What is her murderous motivation? I can't figure it out!" Lao Shengqiao said, he suspected that Lao Rongzhi was coerced to dry those things. Essence

The reporter contacted Liu Jingjie, an agent lawyer of the victim "Little Carpenter" Lu Moumou's family. She said that in the second instance case, the victim's family was not the appellant, so they did not go to the trial. However, she believes that the summary of the first instance judgment is already very comprehensive. Lao Rongzhi participates in the cruel means of the crime and the circumstances are serious. The three crimes and punishment should be sentenced to death. But these arguments are pale and weak.

Zi Niu Journalist ｜ Ren Guoyong Chen Yong

Edit ｜ Zhang Bingjing

Editing ｜ Wan Huijuan

Editor ｜ Chen Dichen

Video Picture Source: Provided by the respondent

Edit: Jing Jie

- END -