Xinhua Time Review: The United States wants to collide with the international order after the war -a Chinese principle cannot be distorted and provocative ①

Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, August 18th: The United States wants to collide with the international order after the war -a Chinese principle cannot be distorted and provocative ①

Xinhua News Agency reporter

Perlis, the president of the United States Congress, maliciously visited Taiwan in China to violate China's sovereignty and interfere with China's internal affairs. Instead, the United States not only did not admit mistakes and corrected errors, but instead hit a rake, slandering China's "destroying international order" with the so -called "excessive reaction". The old saying of the United States is really the old saying that the thief shouted. A Chinese principle constitutes a part of the post -war international order, challenging a Chinese principle is to destroy the post -war international order.

There is only one China in the world, and Taiwan is an indispensable part of China's territory. The "Cairo Declaration" and "Potsdam Announcement" clearly demanded that "stealing Japan in China, such as Manchuria (Northeast China), Taiwan, Penghu Islands, etc." returned China, which is confirmed to Taiwan's international law. The "Potsdam Announcement" and "Cairo Declaration" and other documents with international law effects are important legal cornerstones that jointly build a post -war international order, and have played an important positive role in consolidating the results of the victory of the World Anti -Fascist War and maintaining world peace. The United States abandoning a Chinese principle is to challenge the legal effect of "Cairo Declaration" and "Potsdam Announcement", trample on historical facts, axioms and justice, the damage to the basic criteria of the post -war international order and international law, and the victory of the World Anti -Fascist War. Daleism.

The international order after the war will bring serious consequences. The international system with the United Nations as the core and the international order with international law as the standard has long maintained the overall stability of international relations. A Chinese principle is a very critical international consensus confirmed by the United Nations. It has international law effect and is an important prerequisite and foundation for maintaining the stability of the current great power. The United States provoked the rules of internationalism, which will destroy the functions and status of the United Nations in the international system and damage the interests of most countries in the international community. If the important international rules supporting international order and the spirit of international law will be damaged, then many major global issues will not be resolved. As a result, all human beings are harmed and the United States cannot protect themselves.

A China Principles was confirmed by the resolution of the 2758 of the United University and became an integral part of the post -war international order. The resolution completely solved the political, legal, and procedures of the issues of the United Nations, including Taiwan, including Taiwan, and clarified that there is only one seat in China in the United Nations. The problem. The government representative of the People's Republic of China is China's only legal representative in the United Nations. China ’s 181 China Bank of Construction diplomatic relations clearly acknowledged a China principle and promised to cut off official exchanges with the Taiwan authorities, which also constitutes a political basis for establishing and developing diplomatic relations between China and countries. Challenge the principle of one middle school is to challenge the universal consensus of the international community.

Challenging the principle of China is essentially harming China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, interfered with Chinese internal affairs and even support "division", and violates the basic criteria of international law such as sovereignty and territorial integrity and non -interference in the internal affairs established by the "UN Charter". Challenging a Chinese principle is to challenge the basic criteria of international law and the basic criteria for international relations. The United States provoked a Chinese principle and exposed its unwillingness to the International Order of the United Nations and international law. The United States is the biggest destroyer of the international order and the biggest trouble of regional stability.

A Chinese principle is the political basis of Sino -US relations. On the surface, the United States claims to support a Chinese principle, but in private, it is "cut off the sausage" to eat, blur, and empty the Chinese principle. The United States uses the so -called "relationship with Taiwan" and "six guarantees to Taiwan", and uses it as a prerequisite suffix of a Chinese policy on the three joint communiqués of China and the United States. The so -called "relations with Taiwan" and "six guarantees to Taiwan" are only unilateral behaviors in the United States. Observing the principle of China is not only a political commitment made by the United States to China, but also its commitment to the international community. As we all know, a country uses domestic regulations to avoid its international obligations, and even deny and modify the international commitments it has made. It has seriously violated the principles of prohibitions on international law. It has no legal effect.

Taiwan is part of the historical facts and law directors of China. It is inevitable that Taiwan has never been a country but a part of China. Any harsh behavior that distorted and provoked a Chinese principle was to move against the trend of history, and it was destined to end with failure.

- END -