Encourage farmers to buy a house in many places, farmers' daily: must leave the road for farmers

The release of farmers' consumption potential and encouraging farmers to enter the city to buy houses have once again become a major measure to promote the development of the property market in many places in the country.

According to the incomplete statistics of surging news, since this year, at least at least including Jilin Province Yanji, Jilin Province, Jilin Province, Taizhou, Jiangsu Province, Huanggang, Hubei Province, Zunyi, Guizhou Province, Qianshan, Anhui Province, Jiamusi, Heilongjiang Province, Changchun, Jilin Province, and Liangshan, Sichuan Province Liangshan Province Ningnan County, Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Qinglong County, Qiannan, Guizhou Province, and Funing County, Yancheng, Jiangsu Province issued relevant policies to encourage farmers to enter the city to buy houses.

At the same time, we can see that in cities that encouraged farmers to enter the city to buy houses, local governments have given more preferential policies such as house purchase subsidies and tax subsidies.

Farmers Daily:

Encouraging farmers to buy a house must leave the road for farmers

On August 18th, the "Farmers Daily" published a comment "Encourage farmers to buy a house in the city, not to count the post -road accounts", and the comments wrote: If you want to "attract people with a house" and "stay with people", you must fully guarantee The rights and interests of farmers leave the farmers back.

The following is the full text of the comment:

The sales problem in the county property market has frequently caused heated discussion on public opinion. In the past two days, the videos of the county party committee of a county and county party called the leading cadres to buy a house, and the topic of "encouraging farmers into the city to buy a house to buy a house" has also attracted much attention. Jiangsu Funing, Jilin Huadian, Guizhou Qinglong, Sichuan Ningnan and other counties have released preferential buying policies for farmers. In the context of high pressure on the county's real estate market, encouraging farmers to enter the city to buy a house is obviously the hope of "de -inventory" of the property market on farmers.

Should farmers go to the city to buy a house? This problem cannot be generalized. For those farmers who have accumulated a certain economic strength and indeed they need to leave the country, at this time coincide with the policy "Dongfeng", many counties and cities have adopted house purchase subsidies and enjoyed the compulsory education stage of relocated children. Policy such as applying for housing provident funds and reducing tax reduction for farmers who engaged in the urban buying houses in individual operations have reduced the cost of buying a house and increasing the gold content of "buying a house in the city". It may not be a good opportunity.

However, for farmers who have enough desire to enter the city, they do not have enough ability to buy a house for the time being, and there is no stable income to cover the cost of living after entering the city. In particular, in some places, "voluntarily withdrawn from the homestead and enter the city to buy a house and settle" as a condition for farmers to obtain a subsidy for buying a house to buy a house, we must be particularly cautious.

We always say that rural areas are "buffers" and "pools" for maintaining stability of economic and social stability. In the period of economic prosperity, farmers have entered the city as the labor force of "good quality and cheap", creating huge profits for the city. During the economic contraction, rural homesteads, farmhouses, forest land, and farmland are like a huge sponge, re -absorbing people returning home.

Nowadays, the new downward pressure on the economy has increased, and many counties and cities hope to attract farmers to enter the city with various means to enter the city to activate the economy and expand demand. Such an original intention can be understood. However, if you want to "attract people with a house" and "stay with people", we must fully protect the rights and interests of farmers and leave the road to farmers.

The first thing to pay attention to is that if farmers' lives in the city are difficult to sustain, can they return to the countryside? Farmers enjoy triple protection in the countryside- "rural land contracting rights", "right to use the house site", and "collective income distribution right". These rights are the root causes of farmers. They cannot give up because they buy a house in the city. There are old houses to live, land can be planted. Farmers' contracted rights and homesteads are not unable to retreat, but they must respect the wishes of farmers. Through market means, they follow the laws of value, voluntarily, and paid to change from farmers in accordance with the law, voluntary, and paid. Like the policy of "voluntarily withdrawing from the homestead to get 50,000 yuan to buy a house subsidy", is 50,000 yuan enough farmers to buy a house in the city? Can the city's life be guaranteed? Is such subsidies and rural rights equivalent? Retired citizens have never been asked to abandon the city's hukou and houses in the city. The choice of "two choices", urban residents do not need to do it, and farmers should not face it.

Secondly, after the peasants enter the city, what is the prospect of development? Before the farmers enter the city, a bundle of firewood in front of the door, a rails in the courtyard, and a bundle of firewood on the mountain can solve the basic food and drink. After the peasants entered the city, they hollowed out the whole family's wallet to buy a house. During the current period, the county's economic growth is weak, and the downturn in the real estate industry will inevitably affect the income and employment of migrant workers in the construction industry. The expenditure has increased. Well? While calling on farmers to buy a house, do they have enough employment opportunities for them. If they are unemployed, can they enjoy employment support, unemployment insurance and low income protection as urban residents? In the future, they are old. Has the new population and endowment insurance for these cities have made sufficient plans? Since attracting farmers into the city, the local government must come up with a real sincerity.

my country's urbanization is a long -term historical process. In this process, it is necessary to maintain sufficient historical patience and consider more about farmers. To benefit. In a certain historical time, we must not only allow farmers to enjoy the development results in the process of urban and rural integration, but also protect the farmers' various agricultural rights and interests, so what's bad for farmers to benefit both ends? If you always remember the purchasing power of the farmers, and even the idea of ​​the homestead, it is not advisable to cut off the farmer's backbone and retreat, and the short -term returns and development in exchange are difficult to sustain. As a "town of the city", the county seat is a natural carrier connecting the city and serving the countryside. It must formulate policies and introduce measures. There must be a more overall urban -rural integration. , And even "urban illness, rural medicine". Only get rid of the serious dependence on the "land finance" as soon as possible, make great efforts to practice internal skills, continuously improve the industrial supporting and business environment, optimize the economic structure, develop a real pillar industry, so that farmers who enter the city to buy a house can live in peace. More fun is the fundamental way to resolve the county's economic difficulties.

- END -