The tragedy of Longconggou is not accidental, who will control the wild network attractions?

【Source: Nine Pai News】

On the afternoon of August 13th, Longconggou, Longmen Mountain Town, Pengzhou City, Sichuan, broke the mountain flood. The flood disaster has killed at least 7 people and was injured by many people. Longconggou is a local online celebrity punching point. It is recommended as a niche and camping venue on multiple social platforms. … However, Longcougou is an out -of -the -box "wild" river channel, and it also undertakes flood discharge tasks. There is also a "prohibited down river" warning sign on the side of the river.

The lower reaches of the river are clearly sunny, but the upstream of the rainfall broke out. The tragedy of Longconggou seems very accidental, but it is not the case. In the "Longmen Mountain Town Civilization Tourism Initiative" issued by the local government department, it has long been clearly mentioned that "Long Trench belongs to the three levels of geological disasters, which is prone to mudslides and flood disasters. The flood disaster caused by the local media also reminded the hidden crisis last year.

If the matter is likely to deteriorate, no matter how small this possibility is, it will always happen- "Murphy's Law" is the accidental inevitable, and it is vividly performed in the tragedy of Longconggou. After the tragedy, multiple social platforms have removed the travel strategies, play sharing and other content of Longcougou, but more problematic wild net red scenic spots are obviously continued to be recommended. The huge risks behind the Wild Net Red Scenic Area are not a problem.

The unmanned road is going to go, and the unprepared scenic area is going to go. The donkey friends have been rescued. They have frequently headlined, causing a discussion of whether it should be paid by itself. With the rise of self -driving tours, some scenic spots that have not yet been developed have been liked to be more like to "do not take ordinary roads". After writing tourism strategies, they will report to various social platforms. As a result, many wild scenic spots without any tourism facilities have become Internet celebrity punching points overnight, and are sought after by more people.

Obviously wild and unspoken, but because of multiple platforms, it is often crowded. This kind of wild network red scenic spot created by the Internet platform may not be bad for ordinary tourists. At least there are more places to play, and they are basically free. However, there are obvious risks in it. The risks of the environmental damage brought by the sharp increase in tourists are not to mention, because there are no tourism facilities supporting facilities. It is not so much tourism, but when it is recommended, few people will refuel the lens on the wire mesh and warning signs.

The Flood River has become an Internet celebrity scenic spot. On the one hand, there may be too few high -quality scenic spots, especially if there are too few good scenic spots, people want to avoid the summer but nowhere to go; on the other hand, because of the writers who write tourism strategies and the platform of promoting wild scenic spots, they are fundamental. I did not realize that there was risks and lack of corresponding social responsibility awareness.

The local government departments knew that "mudslides and flood disasters were prone to occur", but there were no necessary measures. It is reported that although the wild scenic spot does not charge, the entrance must also scan the health code, as well as police officers to maintain order. This shows that the flood rush has become an online celebrity scenic spot, and the relevant local departments seem to "see it." After all, there is no bad thing after all. This can also be understood. The problem is that more effective measures should be taken to prevent risks.

The supervision of wild net red scenic spots needs to be further clarified. Social platforms cannot ignore risks and recommendation, and local governments can not ignore risks to push the boat. The adventure for professionals, and tourism for ordinary tourists, the two have clearly divided the wild, cannot be confused in the recommendation of the scenic spot in the Internet age, let alone the tragedy can make the reality as expected.

The copyright belongs to the original author and pays tribute to the original

- END -