"A step forward" 60 years of Dianzilou welcomed the "old house new life".

Building 36 in Yongle Community in Shijingshan District was built in 1958. The building is a traditional Tshuzi Tower structure. Each house does not have an independent kitchen and toilet, and it does not access gas. The living environment of residents is very simple. Satisfy. Over the years, residents have eager to improve the existing environment. This year, Building 36 has the original plan of the original construction. However, after the original demolition plan was announced, the residents had different opinions.

Today, the national livelihood program "Ahead", which is the first citizen of Beijing Satellite TV, will go to Building 36 of Yongle Community in the social livelihood program of the first citizen citizens and the public domain to discuss the reconstruction plan with the residents, the planning department, and the housing and construction department. Together to create a good living environment for residents.

The old -fashioned tube tower is "standard" aging, and there are many hidden dangers of residents' lives

There are 143 residents in Building 36, with an average of more than 30 residents on each floor. For decades, residents have shared public kitchen and public toilets. There are many inconveniences. Some residents wanted to make a fried cake at noon, and they ran back and forth three times in the water room. This is just a microcosm of each resident's daily life. For many years, what are the reasons that residents have been eagerly looking forward to improving their living conditions, and what causes their expectations will never be realized?

The schedule of the dangerous building is on the agenda, and the reconstruction plan is more controversial

In 2021, Building 36 was included in the pilot of the reconstruction of the dangerous buildings in Shijingshan District, and planned to start the original demolition. In 2022, the reconstruction plan was announced to the residents. However, after the announcement of the original plan for two years, some residents inside the building could not wait to reconstruction, but some residents asked for demands on the reconstruction plan and resettlement costs. Some residents believe that the design of the residential area in the reconstruction plan is extremely unreasonable, and the residents have questioned the reconstructed room type.

In fact, the expansion in the demolition and construction plan meets the reconstruction standards. The staff of the municipal planning department and the housing construction department also explained in detail about relevant regulations. However, questions about the details of the scheme have repeatedly appeared, and the controversy is endless. How should this reconstruction plan make residents generally satisfied?

The adjacent dealer is "the target of the criticism", and the voices of the mediation scene

Residents' questions about the size of the building have just received professional answers, but the shops around the building have become the focus of the residents. Residents questioned the scene: Is the bottom merchant shop illegal? Is there a behavior that uses this reconstruction as its own benefit? In addition, there are residents 'statements: we can accept the dealers' melody, but we cannot suffer ...

Can a tube building that urgently needs to be converted, can the reconstruction plan be recognized by all residents? Can the reconstruction project finally landed smoothly? Build a communication platform for "One Step". Can 143 residents agree to the reconstruction and one step forward? For more content, please lock in today's 21:05 Beijing Satellite TV "A step forward"!

- END -