Use more stable expectations to balance tourism and outbreaks

Yan Yong/Wen Hainan, Tibet, Xinjiang ... The popular tourist destinations have a new crown pneumonia epidemic. Among them, the situation of the Sanya is particularly severe. With thousands of cases, thousands of cases are added within a few days, and they are still operating at a high level. The tourists in the inside reached more than 80,000. At the end of this summer, the "play strategy" on the social platform made it located in the "home strategy". Many people lamented that "going out to play is like opening a blind box", and accidentally on the way.

There are many abuses in stranded tourists in public opinion, thinking that travel during the epidemic is chaotic, and being trapped is a blame. This is of course wrong. Under the scale of national epidemic prevention policies, everyone has the right to choose their own lifestyle, home or tourism, just different ways. Individual choices do not need to be judged or accused. The epidemic will not disappear in the short term is a reality. The so -called "special period" is actually a normal state. It cannot be required to use a special attitude to deal with the normal state. The summer vacation is when the epidemic is relatively stable. If everyone is uniformly "home" without going out for consumption, the recovery of the wine tourism industry may not have hope, they have been supporting it for a long time. In the long run, in the end, everyone pays for the economic downturn and the society is not active. This should become a social consensus.

Public discussions should be even more important that under the normalization of the epidemic, how to minimize the uncertainty of the epidemic to tourism to the greatest extent, there are chapters to follow when encountering emergencies, and their hearts are in their hearts. This is also the internal power that tourist cities must cultivate. For tourists, the more stable policy expectations during the emergency epidemic are another soft power in addition to landscapes, food, and services in these cities.

Tourism, especially across provinces, must be accompanied by the risk of the blind box of the epidemic. Under the current epidemic prevention policy, it is possible to stay, and it may be transferred to isolation, which leads to time and economy loss. Individuals should be aware of these uncertainty before traveling, and they should also bear part of them. As an adult, if you only talk about the freedom of choosing a lifestyle without assuing the corresponding risks after choice, it is a "giant baby".

But it is obviously inappropriate for tourists to bear all risk losses. Three parties of tourists, merchants, and local governments are the beneficiaries of tourism consumption. Visitors gain spiritual pleasure, while merchants and local governments have economic benefits. Merchants should share part of the risks with consumers. As for the proportion, the localities can be handled according to the actual situation. The premise is a real burden. For example, if the hotel is discounted by the discount of home prices for stranded tourists, it must be a real discount, rather than discounts at low prices. As for public opinion, do not entangle in "the rich people who live in the five -star hotel, can afford it", and whether it is really affordable or not, procedural justice itself has a stable expectation. What's more, there are a few who are really not bad. Most of the tourists are still limited by the working budget or middle class. If the risk of the super budget is too high and the scope is too large, it will seriously damage the enthusiasm of public tourism. Consumption is also harmful for merchants.

Local governments shall bear corresponding responsibilities in accordance with laws and regulations. There are no faults for the staying tourists themselves. They cooperate with the epidemic prevention and control and cannot return home freely. They transfer their legal rights that belong to their own, and the local government has the responsibility to take care of them. First of all, when the government disposes an epidemic, it must release the greatest goodwill to the tourist group and truly be people -oriented. Do subtraction scientifically instead of blindly adding additions. This table should be scientifically carried out scientifically, and as soon as possible, the trapped passengers should be on the way home, rather than the risk level, and isolate on the spot. Let low -risk tourists go home as soon as possible, not only letting tourists feel at ease, but also reduce the government's own financial load and service guarantee load. The government should also introduce a standardized plan to leave the area, so that tourists can know what channels are passed and what conditions need to be met to go home. The government must help tourists to unblock channels and meet conditions.

Secondly, those tourists who have to stay may be divided into two situations. One is that the risk is indeed high, and the other is to be separated on the spot. For the former, free centralized isolation should be given to the same treatment as the local residents; for the latter, whether you can consider giving tourists to select the right to select, free centralized isolation or continue to stay in the hotel, local governments with discounts like Sanya this time, local governments, local governments, local governments, local governments, local governments. It can give a certain subsidy for hotels that accept the staying tourists. Of course, the most fundamental thing is to promote these tourists home as soon as possible.

Since the three years of the epidemic, there have been many emergencies in tourist destinations in China. From last year's Ejina, Zhangjiajie, to Beihai, Sanya, Xinjiang, and Tibet this year, this situation will happen in the future. This is normal. The local governments and tourism industries are time to establish a normal response mechanism. Even if it is consensus or consensus, it will help to form more stable expectations, make the public weigh the risks more fully before traveling, make choices, and responsibility. In the long run, this is also of great significance for the sustainable development of the tourism market in the era of epidemic. In order to maintain consumption, we can keep the market entity and keep the economy and the future.

- END -