"Follow" the relationship between style, learning style and integrity

In the past two years, the work style, learning style and integrity of scientific research institutions have attracted much attention and have been mentioned. In actual work, there are not a few cases of laughed because of the lack of relationships with the three. Because the author sorted out a manuscript and read the information about work style, style and integrity, he deeply felt that the three were not a completely equal relationship in scientific research institutions, and now briefly discussed.

Since the "107 papers withdrawn" incident in 2017, Research Integrity has gradually become academic studies, and academic research requires integrity, promoting scientific and technological achievements, writing papers require integrity, declaration of honor, and honoring honor. The reward requires integrity, evaluating the pre -appointed title promotion requires integrity. For a while, integrity review became a popular work content, and integrity governance became the focus of the governance work.

Scientific research integrity work is rapidly evolving into an omnipotent basket, and some other appearances are close to the style and style of learning. Especially since 2019, the three have been confused. This mixed can not help some departments in work.

According to the author's foolish opinion, the work of these three has their own focus and cooperation with each other, as well as their own competent authorities, which must be confused.

Among them, the focus of scientific research integrity is "building foundation", and its core is responsible research. Integrity is the basis of scientific and technological activities. Without the result of integrity science, it will deviate from objective facts, become mirror flowers and water, and eventually harm society. Integrity is also the responsible research of international colleagues. If you cannot do the responsibility, objective, authentic, and repeated research, you will become a metaphysics that will be guess, meditation, and inaccessible.

In the past two years, the system of academic surveys has gradually tightened, and the means of curbing academic dislocation behaviors has gradually enriched. It is a strong public opinion or case of exposed scientific research integrity. The idea of ​​doing real investigations, some integrity cases have been seriously handled, a number of academic incompetence has been disclosed by joint punishment, some typical cases have been disclosed, and the typical warning effects of the negative side have begun to appear. All these are showing the trend of the foundation of integrity.

The focus of learning style construction is "cultivation", and its core is professionalism. The good study of scientific research institutions does not exist naturally, but it needs long -term guidance, carefully poured, and cultivated. The so -called watering is water, flowers are flowing; or they eat grass and squeeze milk. According to the "Opinions on Further Promoting the spirit of scientists and strengthening style and learning style, the content of academic style includes" positive leadership, scientific spirit, fair evaluation, allocation of resources, honor incentives "and other aspects.

Possessing leading to the establishment of positive typicals such as science people, and a role model for the establishment of them to form a role of forming. The scientific spirit refers to the spirit of professionalism that respects science among all researchers. Fair evaluation refers to maintaining fairness and justice in institutional assessment, projects and talent evaluations, and scientific evaluation, abandon humanity reviews, avoid conflicts of interest, and break the portal. The allocation resources refer to the rational allocation of scientific and technological resources in accordance with the laws of scientific research and actual needs to ensure maximizing the effectiveness of scientific and technological resources. Honor incentive refers to the appropriate honor and appropriate material incentives to researchers, so that it is renamed and avoids the hat. These tasks are scattered in different management departments and institutions at all levels, so they need to work together and cooperate for a long time.

The focus of work style construction is "cultivation", and its core is solid and low -key. The content of the cultivation of style includes "patriotic dedication, overcoming difficulties, loneliness, and rewarding after school". Style is a position and attitude that needs to be cultivated vigorously. For example, science has no borders and scientists have the motherland, and they are talking about cultivating the patriotic feelings of scientists. To overcome difficulties and solve the "card neck" problem is to cultivate the scientific research team's courage to be the first and who he is the first and who he is. For decades, such as focusing on scientific issues, sitting on cold benches, and not blindly chasing research hotspots, it is to cultivate scientific researchers to be lonely and climbing the peak work style. After the rewards, the tutors are to cultivate the teacher's style of preaching and teaching confusion and bringing a good research echelon.

What is the relationship between the three?

According to the author's see, integrity must be part of the style of learning. In addition to integrity, the study style is also reflected in many tasks such as resources, honor, incentives and evaluations, and the style is another work system. In scientific research units, the style of style and the style of study is especially in the scholarship and the post -learning part of the scholarship. In college, the study style is more extensive, and the style of the academic style contains most of the content of the style. In government units, the style is often an indicator that reflects its policy, rigor, and efficiency. Therefore, the style of style is sometimes good at integrity -the authenticity of statistical data and the scientificity of policies, etc. -related associations.

The relationship between integrity, learning style, and style is very helpful for us to hold our original intentions and improve the governance of various tasks.

(Hou Xingyu author unit: Supervision and Audit Bureau of the Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Source: Chinese Journal of Sciences, "Learning Power" learning platform

Edit: Qinghai Detoxification Government Fusion Media

- END -