Extremely review | Rescuers treat tourists differently, so "appearance discrimination" is lacking and dangerous

Ji Mu News commentator Qu Jing

On August 4, the video of a water park water slide project caused heated discussions on the Internet. The "Glasses Brother" lifeguard in the video suspected to treat tourists differently: Miao Ling Girl slid down and he caught it or hugged his hands. The older tourist slipped down, either let him fall into the bottom, or drag it with one hand. The reporter used the water park as a visit to the video as a tourist. The customer service said that the "glasses brother" lifeguard treats tourists differently. "He has not been punished and is still working normally."

The water slide project is a popular project of the water park. Visitors should slide into the swimming pool at the exit from a very high place. In order to avoid rushing into too fast, it is dangerous. Cushion. In the video, "Brother Glasses" does this work, and from his performance, he can be said to be very negligent, very irresponsible to tourists, and caused a number of legal risks and safety hazards.

From the video point of view, the lifeguard's actions treating young female tourists are too close, and they often contact sensitive parts such as waist and chest. The expressions are also very serious. Many of them have surpassed the scope of work and are suspected of sexual harassment. Even though some women may not be too sensitive and have not discovered it, this kind of oil is cheap and self -procurement, which is really lacking.

For other male tourists and tourists who are not beautiful, his dodging and perfunctory attitude is even more serious. Many tourists did not hold or hold in time, and suddenly rushed to the bottom of the pool and were stunned, and their expression was very embarrassed. The man's face indifferently pulled them out of the picture, even more popular. What, the face value has not been seen by you, even the personal safety is not protected by the basic place?

Because the difference between the lifeguard is too obvious, many netizens teased that he was "the real world" and "the face value appraiser", and also said that the man and the good look good, don't go to this water park to play. Isn't this a naked "appearance discrimination"? Tourists spend money to play equally. Why should they be picked up like this and treat them differently?

According to the law, the main body of safety guarantee obligations such as stadiums, entertainment venues and other operating places, operators, managers, or organizers of public places, or organizers such as organizers, or organizers such as organizers, and other security guarantee obligations. obligation. If a tourist is injured or dangerous because of the difference between a life -saving treatment, then he and the water park will definitely not escape the legal responsibility.

Even if no one happens for the time being, who wants to play such a water park? If you look beautiful, you may "eat tofu" by a life -saving water. If you look ordinary or male, you may have no protective measures. Buying tickets happily to play, but also selectively served by staff. Not only can they not gain relaxation and joy, but also may suffer the loss of rights and interests. Can't find it?

Searching on the Internet, the life -saving "changing face" seems to be a popular paragraph. This short video shows the selfishness and vanity of human nature by revealing and ridicule some "looking at the face", thereby poking the hearts of people. Obtain traffic. This may explain why the attitude of the water park is so puzzling about the heat of related videos. The meaning of the customer service is: things are already known, there is no big deal, and no lifeguard will be punished. Does this indicate that the manager of the water park agrees with this difference to treat customers, and even thinks that this can be marketing as a selling point to attract attention?

If this is the case, I am afraid that the local tourism department needs to get involved. If this kind of lack of virtue and dangerous bad atmosphere becomes a gimmick, I am afraid not only will it cause controversy, disrupt public opinion, but also buried hidden safety hazards. Those selective protection hands, those with selective protection hands. It may eventually become a "promoter" of a security accident.

- END -