Hua Chunying: The Dream of the Seven Kingdoms Group should wake up

According to the "Office of the Foreign Ministry spokesman's office", at the regular press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on August 4, the CCTV reporter of the heads of the heads asked: On the 3rd, the Foreign Minister of the Seventh Kingdom Group and the EU senior representatives issued a joint statement saying that Feeling concerns may lead to unnecessary upgrades, and there is no reason to use Perosi to visit Taiwan as an excuse for aggressive military operations or coercion. It is normal for legislators to travel internationally, and it is also said that the Chinese policy of the Seventh Kingdoms Group has not changed under application. What is the response of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs?

Hua Chunying: This statement makes people feel indifferent sometimes. The foreign ministers of these countries obviously thought they lived in the era of the Eight -Power Allied Forces more than 120 years ago. Today's world is no longer an imperialist powers that can show the world that can be martial arts and want to do whatever they want. Today, China is not an old China, which is not bullied by people more than 100 years ago and slaughtered by others. Their powers should wake up.

I want to emphasize how many points:

First, China has the right to maintain sovereignty and territorial integrity. The current situation of the Taiwan Strait is tight. The root cause is that the United States regards the strong opposition and serious negotiations of the Chinese side, and condracts the government No. 3 characters to visit Taiwan in Taiwan. Sovereignty and territorial integrity. China has repeatedly explicitly explicitly stated the strict position of resolute opposition, and emphasized that China resolutely oppose the division of "Taiwan independence" and interference in external forces, and will never leave any space for any form of "Taiwan independence" forces. The consequences are all responsible for the United States. The US malicious provocation is first, and the Chinese side is just defense. Facing the malicious provocation of the Chinese sovereignty and the integrity of the territory, the Chinese side adopted countermeasures is justified, and it must be resolute and powerful. In this regard, the world is very clear. Hundreds of countries have made a fair voice as soon as possible, emphasizing that they should adhere to a Chinese principle and support Chinese to maintain their sovereignty and territorial integrity. If these countries sincerely care about the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait, they should discourage the United States early not to adopt a risk and irresponsible provocations to China. Before Pelosi visited Taiwan, they pretended to be deaf and silent, but now they jumped out of accusations of justice in China. Their hypocrisy and ugly face exposed.

Second, a Chinese principle is an important political basis for the establishment of diplomatic relations with China and China. China has always resolutely opposed the official exchanges between the establishment of diplomatic relations with the country and Taiwan. The person in charge of the legislative agency of the seven countries should abide by the government's recognition and commitment of foreign policy. If the national government's actions of its parliamentary violations of their domestic foreign policies have nothing to do and laissez -faire, it can only prove that its political incompetence and governance are invalid, and they will be rejected internationally internationally. On this serious issue, playing with text games, or trying to steal the beams, there is no meaning, and it will not have any effect.

Third, there is only one version and one meaning of a Chinese principle, that is, there is only one China in the world, Taiwan is part of China, and the government of the People's Republic of China is the only legal government representing the whole China. This is clearly stipulated by the 2758 resolution passed by the 26th UN General Assembly in 1971. It is the basic criterion for international relations. No prerequisite suffix, nor allows any crooked song solutions.

Fourth, in terms of history or reality, members of the Seven Domestic Groups led by the United States are spokespersons for the image of "aggression" and "coercion".When it comes to "aggression" or "coercion", this hat is still asked to wear the Seven Kingdoms Group by themselves.Don't forget the seven kingdoms, they can't represent the international community.Their views are only a few.Just as Singapore scholar Ma Kaishuo recently pointed out that "the Seven Kingdoms Group has engaged in autocracy internationally internationally."This is also fully reflected in this statement.

I want to remind these seven foreign ministers again that it is the third decade of the 21st century. If the brain stays more than 100 years ago, there is a problem.

Source: WeChat public account

- END -